Session 4 — Project resume question after restart
08-18-2026 → 08-18-2026 · kimi-k3 · 3 messages · 22.2k tokens · $0.0795
Summary
Focus: resume question after a restart.
What happened:
- Brief Q&A: whether the project could resume without
/resumeand whether prior context was visible.
Outcome: question answered; no project work performed.
Can i resume the project from here without doing /resume? Are you able to see what we did to continue?
thinking (126 chars)
The user asks if they can resume without /resume. I should check STATE.md and MEMORY per protocol. Let me read STATE.md first.
Yes — the project archive (not the conversation) is the source of truth, per §8.4. Let me read the resume point.
tool: Read
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\STATE.md"
}
thinking (243 chars)
The user asks: can they resume without /resume — yes. I have STATE.md. I could also skim the latest journal entry. Keep it brief. Maybe read the latest journal entry quickly per protocol §8.3 step 2. Let me check the journal directory quickly.
Yes — no `/resume` needed. The research archive is the single source of truth (NGUYEN.md §8), and I can read it directly. From `STATE.md` and the recent git history, here's where we stand:
**Where we are (end of Session 002):**
- Phase 0 ✅ (paper reproduced, sandbox calibrated) and Phase 1 ✅ (ceiling mastered; Track A → monitoring mode, 6-wall map in D-013)
- Phase 3 (Track C) underway: 3.1 landscape (D-014), positivity horizon quantified (D-015 + E-006, resolution-limited at 1e-10), Q-3.4a closed (D-016), E-007/E-008 done (Li coefficients to n≤116 certified)
- Q-3.4c **scoped** in D-018: Suzuki operators — Thm 1.5 (real spectra) proved, Cor 1.6 identified as the RH bridge
**Next action (explicit in STATE.md):**
1. **E-009a** — implement Suzuki's screw function g(t) in mpmath, validate vs eq. 2.2
2. **E-009b** — Galerkin discretization of A_a; compare bottom spectrum vs first zero ordinates
3. **D-019** — analysis: can our second-moment technology touch Cor 1.6's convergence?
4. Forks queued after (per §8.4a): 3.2 continuation (prime-side Li), 3.3 (de Bruijn–Newman), T4 (ξ′)
No blockers, clean stop. Shall I start E-009a? (If you want, I can also skim `research/journal/session-002.md` for full narrative detail first.)