Current task: —

← Session 17 — Lean tier (i): elementary proofs (after crash)

#637 assistant 2026-08-20 04:25:50.498 UTC · 2093→929 tok open ⤢
thinking (1796 chars)
Concern in the summability proof: the comparison family — `bern_term_upper` gives ≤ (n:ℝ)*(n−1)/(2*↑m^2). I rewrite that to C*(1/↑m^2) — but the `le_trans ... (by ...)` second argument needs type `(n*(n−1))/(2*↑m^2) ≤ C*(1/↑(m.1)^2)` — I proved an EQUALITY then `rw [e]` — goal after rw becomes C*(1/..) ≤ C*(1/..) — not closed! rw leaves `X ≤ X`. Need `le_of_eq e` or end with `exact le_of_eq e`. Fix: replace the `by have e ...; rw [e]` with `by rw [show ... from by ring]` — same issue. Should be: `(le_of_eq (by ring : (n:ℝ)*((n:ℝ)−1)/(2*(m:ℝ)^2) = ((n:ℝ)*((n:ℝ)−1)/2)*(1/((m.1:ℝ)^2))))`. Wait — actually `rw [e]` turns the goal into `C*(1/..) ≤ C*(1/..)`, which is not automatically closed — rw tries rfl afterwards! rw does attempt `rfl` (with reducible transparency) after rewriting. `X ≤ X` is not rfl (le is not eq). `le_refl` isn't rfl-matched... `LE.le X X` — rfl would need `Eq` — no. So it fails. Also ring might not prove that equality if (m:ℝ) vs (m.1:ℝ) mismatch — I wrote (m : ℝ) in e's LHS but m : subtype; (m : ℝ) coerces via ℕ — and RHS (m.1 : ℝ). These are defeq but `ring` works up to defeq atoms? ring normalizes syntactically after atom collection — atoms (m:ℝ) vs (↑m.1:ℝ) — ring treats them as DIFFERENT atoms unless syntactically equal after elaboration. Both elaborate to the same term? (m : ℝ) with m : subtype → coe via Nat.cast (m.1) — elaborates to `Nat.cast ℝ m.1`? Actually the coercion instance: Subtype → ℕ is `Subtype.val`, then ℕ→ℝ Nat.cast. `(m : ℝ)` unifies via coercion insertion: likely `Nat.cast m.1` — identical to `(m.1 : ℝ)` ✓ same term. OK. Fix the le_of_eq issue with an edit. Also check `one_add_mul_le_pow h2 n` in their bern lemmas used `apply one_add_mul_le_pow` — fine, theirs compiled presumably (committed). Let me fix my piece then build.
One fix needed in my summability piece — the `rw [e]` leaves an unclosed `X ≤ X` goal.
tool: Edit
input
{
  "file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiSkeleton.lean",
  "old_string": "    (fun m => le_trans (bern_term_upper n m.1 (Nat.le_trans (by norm_num) m.2.2)) (by\n      have e : (n : \u211d) * ((n : \u211d) - 1) / (2 * (m : \u211d) ^ 2) =\n          ((n : \u211d) * ((n : \u211d) - 1) / 2) * (1 / ((m.1 : \u211d) ^ 2)) := by ring\n      rw [e]))",
  "new_string": "    (fun m => le_trans (bern_term_upper n m.1 (Nat.le_trans (by norm_num) m.2.2))\n      (le_of_eq (by ring : (n : \u211d) * ((n : \u211d) - 1) / (2 * (m : \u211d) ^ 2) =\n          ((n : \u211d) * ((n : \u211d) - 1) / 2) * (1 / ((m.1 : \u211d) ^ 2)))))"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Concern in the summability proof: the comparison family — `bern_term_upper` gives ≤ (n:ℝ)*(n−1)/(2*↑m^2). I rewrite that to C*(1/↑m^2) — but the `le_trans ... (by ...)` second argument needs type `(n*(n−1))/(2*↑m^2) ≤ C*(1/↑(m.1)^2)` — I proved an EQUALITY then `rw [e]` — goal after rw becomes C*(1/..) ≤ C*(1/..) — not closed! rw leaves `X ≤ X`. Need `le_of_eq e` or end with `exact le_of_eq e`. Fix: replace the `by have e ...; rw [e]` with `by rw [show ... from by ring]` — same issue. Should be: `(le_of_eq (by ring : (n:ℝ)*((n:ℝ)−1)/(2*(m:ℝ)^2) = ((n:ℝ)*((n:ℝ)−1)/2)*(1/((m.1:ℝ)^2))))`.\n\nWait — actually `rw [e]` turns the goal into `C*(1/..) ≤ C*(1/..)`, which is not automatically closed — rw tries rfl afterwards! rw does attempt `rfl` (with reducible transparency) after rewriting. `X ≤ X` is not rfl (le is not eq). `le_refl` isn't rfl-matched... `LE.le X X` — rfl would need `Eq` — no. So it fails. Also ring might not prove that equality if (m:ℝ) vs (m.1:ℝ) mismatch — I wrote (m : ℝ) in e's LHS but m : subtype; (m : ℝ) coerces via ℕ — and RHS (m.1 : ℝ). These are defeq but `ring` works up to defeq atoms? ring normalizes syntactically after atom collection — atoms (m:ℝ) vs (↑m.1:ℝ) — ring treats them as DIFFERENT atoms unless syntactically equal after elaboration. Both elaborate to the same term? (m : ℝ) with m : subtype → coe via Nat.cast (m.1) — elaborates to `Nat.cast ℝ m.1`? Actually the coercion instance: Subtype → ℕ is `Subtype.val`, then ℕ→ℝ Nat.cast. `(m : ℝ)` unifies via coercion insertion: likely `Nat.cast m.1` — identical to `(m.1 : ℝ)` ✓ same term. OK.\n\nFix the le_of_eq issue with an edit. Also check `one_add_mul_le_pow h2 n` in their bern lemmas used `apply one_add_mul_le_pow` — fine, theirs compiled presumably (committed). Let me fix my piece then build.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"One fix needed in my summability piece — the `rw [e]` leaves an unclosed `X ≤ X` goal."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_47","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiSkeleton.lean","old_string":"    (fun m => le_trans (bern_term_upper n m.1 (Nat.le_trans (by norm_num) m.2.2)) (by\n      have e : (n : ℝ) * ((n : ℝ) - 1) / (2 * (m : ℝ) ^ 2) =\n          ((n : ℝ) * ((n : ℝ) - 1) / 2) * (1 / ((m.1 : ℝ) ^ 2)) := by ring\n      rw [e]))","new_string":"    (fun m => le_trans (bern_term_upper n m.1 (Nat.le_trans (by norm_num) m.2.2))\n      (le_of_eq (by ring : (n : ℝ) * ((n : ℝ) - 1) / (2 * (m : ℝ) ^ 2) =\n          ((n : ℝ) * ((n : ℝ) - 1) / 2) * (1 / ((m.1 : ℝ) ^ 2)))))"},"extra_content":null}]