[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Done. Summarize concisely:\n\n1. Agreed with the user — reverted everything.\n2. Facts: site was always displaying content correctly; my changes were presentation-only; now fully reverted.\n3. Commit 50f96fa restores the exact pre-pass state; verified live (D-004 passage verbatim, zero formula blocks).\n4. Recorded the standing rule in RH-WEBSITE.md + memory so no future session re-attempts it.\n5. Refresh browser to see the original state.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"Agreed, and done — everything is reverted. Final state:\n\n- **Commit `50f96fa`** restores `research_data.py` and `style.css` to exactly what they were before I touched anything. The typography pass is gone (history keeps the record in `bf7af04`/`d0e0c41`, but the code is back).\n- **Verified live**: all 20 routes OK; D-004 renders that passage verbatim again (`b := (1/L)∫ϕ⁴ (0 < b ≤ a ≤ 1); Φ := ϕ²̂; …` as plain text); zero formula-block transforms anywhere.\n- **Recorded the rule** so no future session re-attempts it: RH-WEBSITE.md §7 now states the website renders the archive **verbatim** — no conversions, no formula-detection heuristics, no restyling of archive math.\n\nTo be clear on the facts: the site was never displaying anything *incorrectly* — your files' text was always shown character-for-character as written. What you saw as \"not formatted\" was simply the archive's Unicode notation itself, which is the intended, correct rendering. **Ctrl+F5** in the browser and it'll look exactly as it did before my changes."}]