← Session 22 — ii′-1: liCoeff pairing fix + residue machinery
thinking (4013 chars)
Line 155: `hG.comp 0 haffine` — ContinuousAt.comp (hf : ContinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) — hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1+0)/2) — the point ((1+0)/2) — the unifier against (g 0) with g := the affine from haffine — (fun s => (1+s)/2) 0 — beta → (1+0)/2 — hG's point — hmm — the error says haffine expected to have type ContinuousAt (HDiv.hDiv (1+0)) 2 — the SAME mis-unification (hG's point (1+0)/2 = HDiv.hDiv (1+0) 2 read as application of HDiv.hDiv (1+0) to 2!). Fix with comp_of_eq-style — but for ContinuousAt is there `ContinuousAt.comp_of_eq`? — there might not be. Alternative: hG's point as the application form: hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1+s)/2) 0):
```lean
have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by
convert Complex.continuousAt_Gamma ((1 : ℂ) / 2) ?_ using 2 -- hmm
```
Hmm — let me think about the cleanest way to get hG at the point `((fun s => (1+s)/2) 0)`: I need ContinuousAt Gamma at that point. The point (fun s => (1+s)/2) 0 = (1+0)/2 — and I want the hypothesis with the UNREDUCED application. Build via:
```lean
have hG0 : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1 : ℂ) / 2) := by
apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma
[the pole-free at 1/2]
have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by
have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by
show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2
ring
rw [e] -- NO — this rewrites the GOAL's point from the application to 1/2 — wrong direction for what I want
exact hG0
```
hmm — the rw [e] on the goal turns the goal's point into 1/2 — then exact hG0 ✓ — but then hG's STATED type has the application form ✓ — because the have's TYPE is fixed as written (the application) regardless of the proof's internal rewrites ✓✓. So:
```lean
have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by
have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by
show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2
ring
rw [e]
[the pole-free proof at 1/2]
```
Wait — rw [e] on the goal `ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s => (1+s)/2) 0)` — e's LHS pattern is the application — rewrites it → ContinuousAt Gamma (1/2) ✓ then prove by Complex.continuousAt_Gamma with the pole-free at 1/2 ✓. The hG's stated type keeps the application form ✓ then `hG.comp 0 haffine` — the comp's (g 0) with g := haffine's function (fun s => (1+s)/2) — hG's point IS (fun s => (1+s)/2) 0 ✓ syntactic match ✓✓.
Similarly for the h1 in hcd0 — use the same convert-with-application-form trick:
```lean
have h1 : AnalyticAt ℂ Complex.digamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by
have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by
show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2
ring
rw [e]
exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half
```
The application form preserved ✓ then AnalyticAt.comp h1 h2 unifies f := (fun s => (1+s)/2) ✓.
And line 239's `rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]` — pattern iteratedDeriv j digamma (1/2) — the goal has iteratedDeriv j digamma ((1+0)/2) — the point (1+0)/2 vs 1/2 — mismatch — normalize the goal's point first: the iteratedDeriv_one_add_div_two's conclusion has point ((1+s)/2) with s := 0 — (1+0)/2 — so the goal has digamma ((1+0)/2) — and the lemma's point is 1/2 — add a normalization: `rw [show ((1 : ℂ) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring]`? — wait — the goal's form is `digamma ((1 + 0) / 2)` — rewrite ((1+0)/2) → (1/2) via `rw [show ((1:ℂ) + 0)/2 = 1/2 from by ring]`?? — the pattern (1+0)/2 — hmm the goal's is digamma ((1 + 0) / 2) — the subterm (1+0)/2 — wait actually from the error at 239: the goal after iteratedDeriv_one_add_div_two shows `iteratedDeriv j digamma ((1 + 0) / 2)` — so the point is ((1+0)/2) — rewrite it: rw [show ((1 : ℂ) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring] — matches the subterm ✓ then the goal has digamma (1/2) ✓ then rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj] matches ✓.
Let me apply all three fixes.
Applying the application-form preservation fixes and the point normalization.
tool: Edit ok
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean",
"old_string": " have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) := by\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n intro hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith",
"new_string": " have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith"
}
result 2026-08-22 11:21:03Z → 2026-08-22 11:21:03Z
{
"filePath": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean",
"oldString": " have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) := by\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n intro hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith",
"newString": " have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith",
"originalFile": "/-\nNguyenRH1/LiArchimedean.lean \u2014 tier ii\u2032 sub-stage ii\u2032-3a, piece (A)\n(D-066 \u00a74): the archimedean coefficients of the (4.10) split.\n\nTarget (D-066): the Taylor coefficients of s \u21a6 logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) at 0:\n\n (1/j!)\u00b7iteratedDeriv j (fun s => logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s)) 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1} a_{j+1},\n\ni.e. `iteratedDeriv j ... 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1}\u00b7j!\u00b7lagariasA (j+1)`.\n\nPart 1 (this file, complete): the Gamma\u211d logDeriv split\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) = \u2212(log \u03c0)/2 + (1/2)\u00b7digamma((1+s)/2)\n(`logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add`) and the j = 0 evaluation\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d 1 = \u2212(log 4\u03c0 + \u03b3)/2 = \u2212lagariasA1\n(`logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one`) \u2014 via Mathlib's `Complex.digamma_one_half`.\n\nPart 2 (next): the digamma series from BohrMollerup's logGammaSeq and the\nj \u2265 1 polygamma values at 1/2, then the odd-m reindexing to lagariasA.\n\nArchive references: D-066 (route \u03b24, piece A), journal-019/020.\n-/\nimport Mathlib\nimport NguyenRH1.LiDigamma\n\nopen Zeta23 Complex Filter Topology\nopen scoped Nat\n\nnoncomputable section\n\nnamespace NguyenRH1\n\n/-! ## 1. The Gamma\u211d logDeriv split -/\n\n/-- The cpow factor as an exponential: \u03c0^(\u2212w/2) = exp(\u2212(log \u03c0)/2\u00b7w). -/\nlemma pi_cpow_neg_half_eq_exp (w : \u2102) :\n (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) ^ (-w / 2) = Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) := by\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero (by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero)]\n congr 1\n rw [\u2190 Complex.ofReal_log Real.pi_nonneg]\n ring_nf\n\n/-- The Gamma\u211d logDeriv split: for (1+s)/2 off the poles of \u0393,\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) = \u2212(log \u03c0)/2 + (1/2)\u00b7\u03c8((1+s)/2). -/\nlemma logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add {s : \u2102}\n (hs : Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0)\n (hs2 : \u2200 m : \u2115, ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 -m) :\n logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s) =\n -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 + (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := by\n have hfun : Complex.Gamma\u211d = fun w : \u2102 =>\n Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) * Complex.Gamma (w / 2) := by\n funext w\n show Complex.Gamma\u211d w = _\n rw [Complex.Gamma\u211d_def]\n congr 1\n exact pi_cpow_neg_half_eq_exp w\n rw [hfun]\n have hdif1 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w))\n (1 + s) := by\n have h1 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) (1 + s) :=\n differentiableAt_id.const_mul _\n exact Complex.differentiableAt_exp.comp (1 + s) h1\n have hdif2 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) := by\n have h2 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) (1 + s) :=\n differentiableAt_id.div_const 2\n exact (Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma _ hs2).comp (1 + s) h2\n rw [logDeriv_mul (f := fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w))\n (g := fun w => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) (Complex.exp_ne_zero _) hs hdif1 hdif2]\n have h1 : logDeriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)) (1 + s) =\n -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 := by\n rw [logDeriv_apply]\n have hd : deriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)) (1 + s) =\n Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s)) * (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) := by\n have hh1 : HasDerivAt (fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)\n (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) (1 + s) := by\n simpa using (hasDerivAt_id (1 + s)).const_mul (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2)\n have hh2 := (Complex.hasDerivAt_exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s))).comp (1 + s) hh1\n have heq : (Complex.exp \u2218 fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) =\n fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hh2\n exact hh2.deriv\n rw [hd]\n field_simp [Complex.exp_ne_zero (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s))]\n have h2 : logDeriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) =\n (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := by\n rw [logDeriv_apply]\n have hd : deriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) =\n deriv Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) * (1 / 2) := by\n have hh1 : HasDerivAt (fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) (1 / 2) (1 + s) := by\n simpa using (hasDerivAt_id (1 + s)).div_const (2 : \u2102)\n have hh2 := ((Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma _ hs2).hasDerivAt).comp (1 + s) hh1\n have heq : (Complex.Gamma \u2218 fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) = fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hh2\n exact hh2.deriv\n rw [hd, Complex.digamma_def, logDeriv_apply]\n field_simp [hs]\n rw [h1, h2]\n\n/-! ## 2. The j = 0 evaluation: \u03c4\u2080 = \u2212a\u2081 -/\n\n/-- log(4\u03c0) = 2\u00b7log 2 + log \u03c0. -/\nlemma log_four_pi : Real.log (4 * Real.pi) = 2 * Real.log 2 + Real.log Real.pi := by\n rw [Real.log_mul (by norm_num) (by positivity)]\n congr 1\n rw [show (4 : \u211d) = 2 ^ 2 from by norm_num, Real.log_pow]\n ring\n\n/-- **\u03c4\u2080** (D-066 \u00a74, j = 0): logDeriv Gamma\u211d 1 = \u2212(log 4\u03c0 + \u03b3)/2 = \u2212a\u2081. -/\ntheorem logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one :\n logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d 1 = -(lagariasA1 : \u2102) := by\n have hs : Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e, Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq]\n have hpi : (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) \u2260 0 := by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero hpi]\n exact Complex.exp_ne_zero _\n have hs2 : \u2200 m : \u2115, ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 -m := by\n intro m hm\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e] at hm\n have hre : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hm]\n simp at hre\n have hm0 : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n have h := logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add (s := 0) hs hs2\n rw [add_zero] at h\n rw [h]\n rw [Complex.digamma_one_half]\n rw [show Complex.log (2 : \u2102) = (Real.log 2 : \u2102) by\n rw [show (2 : \u2102) = ((2 : \u211d) : \u2102) by simp]\n exact (Complex.ofReal_log (by norm_num : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 2)).symm]\n rw [lagariasA1, log_four_pi]\n push_cast\n ring\n\n/-! ## 3. The full archimedean coefficient evaluation (all j) -/\n\n/-- The split's hypotheses hold on a neighbourhood of 0. -/\nlemma eventually_Gamma_ne_zero_and_pole_free :\n (\u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0) \u2227\n (\u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), \u2200 m : \u2115, (1 + s) / 2 \u2260 -(m : \u2102)) := by\n have hcont1 : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 := by\n have haffine : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 := by\n have h := (continuousAt_const.add continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => 1 + s) 0)\n simpa using h.div_const (2 : \u2102)\n have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) := by\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n intro hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n have hcomp := hG.comp 0 haffine\n have heq : (Complex.Gamma \u2218 fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) =\n fun s => Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hcomp\n exact hcomp\n have h1 : \u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have hG1 : Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e, Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq]\n have hpi : (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) \u2260 0 := by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero hpi]\n exact Complex.exp_ne_zero _\n exact hcont1.tendsto.eventually_ne hG1\n have h2 : \u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), \u2200 m : \u2115, (1 + s) / 2 \u2260 -(m : \u2102) := by\n have hopen : IsOpen {s : \u2102 | 0 < (((1 + s) / 2).re)} := by\n have hcont : Continuous (fun s : \u2102 => (((1 + s) / 2).re)) := by\n have h1 : Continuous (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) :=\n (continuous_const.add continuous_id).div_const (2 : \u2102)\n exact Complex.continuous_re.comp h1\n exact isOpen_Ioi.preimage hcont\n have hmem : (0 : \u2102) \u2208 {s : \u2102 | 0 < (((1 + s) / 2).re)} := by\n show 0 < (((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2).re)\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n simp\n filter_upwards [hopen.mem_nhds hmem] with s hs\n intro m hmeq\n rw [hmeq] at hs\n simp at hs\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n exact \u27e8h1, h2\u27e9\n\n/-- **Piece (A), the archimedean Taylor coefficients (D-066 \u00a74)**: for all j,\n iteratedDeriv j (fun s => logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s)) 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1}\u00b7j!\u00b7\u2191lagariasA(j+1). -/\ntheorem iteratedDeriv_logDeriv_Gamma\u211d (j : \u2115) :\n iteratedDeriv j (fun s : \u2102 => logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s)) 0 =\n ((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d) := by\n rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos j with hj0 | hj0\n \u00b7 subst hj0\n rw [iteratedDeriv_zero]\n rw [lagariasA, if_pos rfl]\n simp [logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one]\n \u00b7 have hj : 1 \u2264 j := hj0\n obtain \u27e8hG, hpole\u27e9 := eventually_Gamma_ne_zero_and_pole_free\n have hev : (fun s : \u2102 => logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s)) =\u1da0[\ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102)]\n (fun s => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 + (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) := by\n filter_upwards [hG, hpole] with s h1 h2\n exact logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add h1 h2\n rw [iteratedDeriv_congr_of_eventuallyEq hev]\n -- the constant dies for j \u2265 1\n have hsplit2 : (fun s : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 +\n (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) =\n (fun _ : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) +\n (fun s => (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) := rfl\n rw [hsplit2]\n have hcd0 : ContDiffAt \u2102 j (fun s => Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 := by\n have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n convert digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half\n simp\n have h2 : AnalyticAt \u2102 (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 :=\n (analyticAt_const.add analyticAt_id).div analyticAt_const (by norm_num)\n have h3 := AnalyticAt.comp h1 h2\n have heq : (Complex.digamma \u2218 (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2)) =\n fun s => Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at h3\n exact h3.contDiffAt\n have hcd : ContDiffAt \u2102 j (fun s => (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 :=\n (contDiff_const (\ud835\udd5c := \u2102) (c := (1 / 2 : \u2102))).contDiffAt.mul hcd0\n rw [iteratedDeriv_add contDiff_const.contDiffAt hcd]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_const, if_neg (by omega : j \u2260 0), zero_add]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_const_mul (1 / 2 : \u2102) hcd0]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_one_add_div_two Complex.digamma j (by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half) (by\n have hcont : Tendsto (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) (\ud835\udcdd 0) (\ud835\udcdd ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2)) := by\n have hc : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 := by\n have h := (continuousAt_const.add continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => 1 + s) 0)\n simpa using h.div_const (2 : \u2102)\n exact hc.tendsto\n have h1 : ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [h1] at hcont\n exact hcont.eventually ((digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half).eventually_analyticAt))]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by\n rw [show ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j = ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ (j + 1) from by\n rw [pow_succ]; ring]\n rw [\u2190 mul_pow]\n simp\n have hkey : (1 / 2 : \u2102) * ((1 / 2 : \u2102) ^ j *\n (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * ((2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)))) =\n ((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d) := by\n rw [show (1 / 2 : \u2102) * ((1 / 2 : \u2102) ^ j * (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) *\n ((2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)))) =\n (((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1)) *\n (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)) by ring]\n rw [h2pow]\n ring\n exact hkey\n",
"structuredPatch": [
{
"oldStart": 142,
"oldLines": 12,
"newStart": 142,
"newLines": 13,
"lines": [
" have haffine : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 := by",
" have h := (continuousAt_const.add continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => 1 + s) 0)",
" simpa using h.div_const (2 : \u2102)",
"- have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) := by",
"+ have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by",
"+ have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by",
"+ show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2",
"+ ring",
"+ rw [e]",
" apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma",
"- intro m",
"- have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring",
"- rw [e]",
"- intro hcontra",
"+ intro m hcontra",
" have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]",
" simp at h2",
" have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m"
]
}
],
"userModified": false,
"replaceAll": false
}
tool: Edit ok
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean",
"old_string": " have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n convert digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half\n simp",
"new_string": " have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half"
}
result 2026-08-22 11:21:03Z → 2026-08-22 11:21:03Z
{
"filePath": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean",
"oldString": " have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n convert digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half\n simp",
"newString": " have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half",
"originalFile": "/-\nNguyenRH1/LiArchimedean.lean \u2014 tier ii\u2032 sub-stage ii\u2032-3a, piece (A)\n(D-066 \u00a74): the archimedean coefficients of the (4.10) split.\n\nTarget (D-066): the Taylor coefficients of s \u21a6 logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) at 0:\n\n (1/j!)\u00b7iteratedDeriv j (fun s => logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s)) 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1} a_{j+1},\n\ni.e. `iteratedDeriv j ... 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1}\u00b7j!\u00b7lagariasA (j+1)`.\n\nPart 1 (this file, complete): the Gamma\u211d logDeriv split\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) = \u2212(log \u03c0)/2 + (1/2)\u00b7digamma((1+s)/2)\n(`logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add`) and the j = 0 evaluation\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d 1 = \u2212(log 4\u03c0 + \u03b3)/2 = \u2212lagariasA1\n(`logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one`) \u2014 via Mathlib's `Complex.digamma_one_half`.\n\nPart 2 (next): the digamma series from BohrMollerup's logGammaSeq and the\nj \u2265 1 polygamma values at 1/2, then the odd-m reindexing to lagariasA.\n\nArchive references: D-066 (route \u03b24, piece A), journal-019/020.\n-/\nimport Mathlib\nimport NguyenRH1.LiDigamma\n\nopen Zeta23 Complex Filter Topology\nopen scoped Nat\n\nnoncomputable section\n\nnamespace NguyenRH1\n\n/-! ## 1. The Gamma\u211d logDeriv split -/\n\n/-- The cpow factor as an exponential: \u03c0^(\u2212w/2) = exp(\u2212(log \u03c0)/2\u00b7w). -/\nlemma pi_cpow_neg_half_eq_exp (w : \u2102) :\n (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) ^ (-w / 2) = Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) := by\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero (by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero)]\n congr 1\n rw [\u2190 Complex.ofReal_log Real.pi_nonneg]\n ring_nf\n\n/-- The Gamma\u211d logDeriv split: for (1+s)/2 off the poles of \u0393,\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) = \u2212(log \u03c0)/2 + (1/2)\u00b7\u03c8((1+s)/2). -/\nlemma logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add {s : \u2102}\n (hs : Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0)\n (hs2 : \u2200 m : \u2115, ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 -m) :\n logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s) =\n -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 + (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := by\n have hfun : Complex.Gamma\u211d = fun w : \u2102 =>\n Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) * Complex.Gamma (w / 2) := by\n funext w\n show Complex.Gamma\u211d w = _\n rw [Complex.Gamma\u211d_def]\n congr 1\n exact pi_cpow_neg_half_eq_exp w\n rw [hfun]\n have hdif1 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w))\n (1 + s) := by\n have h1 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) (1 + s) :=\n differentiableAt_id.const_mul _\n exact Complex.differentiableAt_exp.comp (1 + s) h1\n have hdif2 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) := by\n have h2 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) (1 + s) :=\n differentiableAt_id.div_const 2\n exact (Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma _ hs2).comp (1 + s) h2\n rw [logDeriv_mul (f := fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w))\n (g := fun w => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) (Complex.exp_ne_zero _) hs hdif1 hdif2]\n have h1 : logDeriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)) (1 + s) =\n -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 := by\n rw [logDeriv_apply]\n have hd : deriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)) (1 + s) =\n Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s)) * (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) := by\n have hh1 : HasDerivAt (fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)\n (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) (1 + s) := by\n simpa using (hasDerivAt_id (1 + s)).const_mul (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2)\n have hh2 := (Complex.hasDerivAt_exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s))).comp (1 + s) hh1\n have heq : (Complex.exp \u2218 fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) =\n fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hh2\n exact hh2.deriv\n rw [hd]\n field_simp [Complex.exp_ne_zero (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s))]\n have h2 : logDeriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) =\n (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := by\n rw [logDeriv_apply]\n have hd : deriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) =\n deriv Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) * (1 / 2) := by\n have hh1 : HasDerivAt (fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) (1 / 2) (1 + s) := by\n simpa using (hasDerivAt_id (1 + s)).div_const (2 : \u2102)\n have hh2 := ((Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma _ hs2).hasDerivAt).comp (1 + s) hh1\n have heq : (Complex.Gamma \u2218 fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) = fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hh2\n exact hh2.deriv\n rw [hd, Complex.digamma_def, logDeriv_apply]\n field_simp [hs]\n rw [h1, h2]\n\n/-! ## 2. The j = 0 evaluation: \u03c4\u2080 = \u2212a\u2081 -/\n\n/-- log(4\u03c0) = 2\u00b7log 2 + log \u03c0. -/\nlemma log_four_pi : Real.log (4 * Real.pi) = 2 * Real.log 2 + Real.log Real.pi := by\n rw [Real.log_mul (by norm_num) (by positivity)]\n congr 1\n rw [show (4 : \u211d) = 2 ^ 2 from by norm_num, Real.log_pow]\n ring\n\n/-- **\u03c4\u2080** (D-066 \u00a74, j = 0): logDeriv Gamma\u211d 1 = \u2212(log 4\u03c0 + \u03b3)/2 = \u2212a\u2081. -/\ntheorem logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one :\n logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d 1 = -(lagariasA1 : \u2102) := by\n have hs : Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e, Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq]\n have hpi : (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) \u2260 0 := by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero hpi]\n exact Complex.exp_ne_zero _\n have hs2 : \u2200 m : \u2115, ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 -m := by\n intro m hm\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e] at hm\n have hre : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hm]\n simp at hre\n have hm0 : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n have h := logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add (s := 0) hs hs2\n rw [add_zero] at h\n rw [h]\n rw [Complex.digamma_one_half]\n rw [show Complex.log (2 : \u2102) = (Real.log 2 : \u2102) by\n rw [show (2 : \u2102) = ((2 : \u211d) : \u2102) by simp]\n exact (Complex.ofReal_log (by norm_num : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 2)).symm]\n rw [lagariasA1, log_four_pi]\n push_cast\n ring\n\n/-! ## 3. The full archimedean coefficient evaluation (all j) -/\n\n/-- The split's hypotheses hold on a neighbourhood of 0. -/\nlemma eventually_Gamma_ne_zero_and_pole_free :\n (\u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0) \u2227\n (\u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), \u2200 m : \u2115, (1 + s) / 2 \u2260 -(m : \u2102)) := by\n have hcont1 : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 := by\n have haffine : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 := by\n have h := (continuousAt_const.add continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => 1 + s) 0)\n simpa using h.div_const (2 : \u2102)\n have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n have hcomp := hG.comp 0 haffine\n have heq : (Complex.Gamma \u2218 fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) =\n fun s => Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hcomp\n exact hcomp\n have h1 : \u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have hG1 : Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e, Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq]\n have hpi : (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) \u2260 0 := by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero hpi]\n exact Complex.exp_ne_zero _\n exact hcont1.tendsto.eventually_ne hG1\n have h2 : \u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), \u2200 m : \u2115, (1 + s) / 2 \u2260 -(m : \u2102) := by\n have hopen : IsOpen {s : \u2102 | 0 < (((1 + s) / 2).re)} := by\n have hcont : Continuous (fun s : \u2102 => (((1 + s) / 2).re)) := by\n have h1 : Continuous (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) :=\n (continuous_const.add continuous_id).div_const (2 : \u2102)\n exact Complex.continuous_re.comp h1\n exact isOpen_Ioi.preimage hcont\n have hmem : (0 : \u2102) \u2208 {s : \u2102 | 0 < (((1 + s) / 2).re)} := by\n show 0 < (((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2).re)\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n simp\n filter_upwards [hopen.mem_nhds hmem] with s hs\n intro m hmeq\n rw [hmeq] at hs\n simp at hs\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n exact \u27e8h1, h2\u27e9\n\n/-- **Piece (A), the archimedean Taylor coefficients (D-066 \u00a74)**: for all j,\n iteratedDeriv j (fun s => logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s)) 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1}\u00b7j!\u00b7\u2191lagariasA(j+1). -/\ntheorem iteratedDeriv_logDeriv_Gamma\u211d (j : \u2115) :\n iteratedDeriv j (fun s : \u2102 => logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s)) 0 =\n ((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d) := by\n rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos j with hj0 | hj0\n \u00b7 subst hj0\n rw [iteratedDeriv_zero]\n rw [lagariasA, if_pos rfl]\n simp [logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one]\n \u00b7 have hj : 1 \u2264 j := hj0\n obtain \u27e8hG, hpole\u27e9 := eventually_Gamma_ne_zero_and_pole_free\n have hev : (fun s : \u2102 => logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s)) =\u1da0[\ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102)]\n (fun s => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 + (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) := by\n filter_upwards [hG, hpole] with s h1 h2\n exact logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add h1 h2\n rw [iteratedDeriv_congr_of_eventuallyEq hev]\n -- the constant dies for j \u2265 1\n have hsplit2 : (fun s : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 +\n (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) =\n (fun _ : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) +\n (fun s => (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) := rfl\n rw [hsplit2]\n have hcd0 : ContDiffAt \u2102 j (fun s => Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 := by\n have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n convert digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half\n simp\n have h2 : AnalyticAt \u2102 (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 :=\n (analyticAt_const.add analyticAt_id).div analyticAt_const (by norm_num)\n have h3 := AnalyticAt.comp h1 h2\n have heq : (Complex.digamma \u2218 (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2)) =\n fun s => Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at h3\n exact h3.contDiffAt\n have hcd : ContDiffAt \u2102 j (fun s => (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 :=\n (contDiff_const (\ud835\udd5c := \u2102) (c := (1 / 2 : \u2102))).contDiffAt.mul hcd0\n rw [iteratedDeriv_add contDiff_const.contDiffAt hcd]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_const, if_neg (by omega : j \u2260 0), zero_add]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_const_mul (1 / 2 : \u2102) hcd0]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_one_add_div_two Complex.digamma j (by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half) (by\n have hcont : Tendsto (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) (\ud835\udcdd 0) (\ud835\udcdd ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2)) := by\n have hc : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 := by\n have h := (continuousAt_const.add continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => 1 + s) 0)\n simpa using h.div_const (2 : \u2102)\n exact hc.tendsto\n have h1 : ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [h1] at hcont\n exact hcont.eventually ((digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half).eventually_analyticAt))]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by\n rw [show ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j = ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ (j + 1) from by\n rw [pow_succ]; ring]\n rw [\u2190 mul_pow]\n simp\n have hkey : (1 / 2 : \u2102) * ((1 / 2 : \u2102) ^ j *\n (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * ((2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)))) =\n ((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d) := by\n rw [show (1 / 2 : \u2102) * ((1 / 2 : \u2102) ^ j * (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) *\n ((2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)))) =\n (((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1)) *\n (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)) by ring]\n rw [h2pow]\n ring\n exact hkey\n",
"structuredPatch": [
{
"oldStart": 211,
"oldLines": 8,
"newStart": 211,
"newLines": 11,
"lines": [
" rw [hsplit2]",
" have hcd0 : ContDiffAt \u2102 j (fun s => Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 := by",
" have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by",
"- convert digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half",
"- simp",
"+ have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by",
"+ show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2",
"+ ring",
"+ rw [e]",
"+ exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half",
" have h2 : AnalyticAt \u2102 (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 :=",
" (analyticAt_const.add analyticAt_id).div analyticAt_const (by norm_num)",
" have h3 := AnalyticAt.comp h1 h2"
]
}
],
"userModified": false,
"replaceAll": false
}
tool: Edit ok
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean",
"old_string": " rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by",
"new_string": " rw [show ((1 : \u2102) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by"
}
result 2026-08-22 11:21:03Z → 2026-08-22 11:21:03Z
{
"filePath": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean",
"oldString": " rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by",
"newString": " rw [show ((1 : \u2102) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by",
"originalFile": "/-\nNguyenRH1/LiArchimedean.lean \u2014 tier ii\u2032 sub-stage ii\u2032-3a, piece (A)\n(D-066 \u00a74): the archimedean coefficients of the (4.10) split.\n\nTarget (D-066): the Taylor coefficients of s \u21a6 logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) at 0:\n\n (1/j!)\u00b7iteratedDeriv j (fun s => logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s)) 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1} a_{j+1},\n\ni.e. `iteratedDeriv j ... 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1}\u00b7j!\u00b7lagariasA (j+1)`.\n\nPart 1 (this file, complete): the Gamma\u211d logDeriv split\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) = \u2212(log \u03c0)/2 + (1/2)\u00b7digamma((1+s)/2)\n(`logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add`) and the j = 0 evaluation\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d 1 = \u2212(log 4\u03c0 + \u03b3)/2 = \u2212lagariasA1\n(`logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one`) \u2014 via Mathlib's `Complex.digamma_one_half`.\n\nPart 2 (next): the digamma series from BohrMollerup's logGammaSeq and the\nj \u2265 1 polygamma values at 1/2, then the odd-m reindexing to lagariasA.\n\nArchive references: D-066 (route \u03b24, piece A), journal-019/020.\n-/\nimport Mathlib\nimport NguyenRH1.LiDigamma\n\nopen Zeta23 Complex Filter Topology\nopen scoped Nat\n\nnoncomputable section\n\nnamespace NguyenRH1\n\n/-! ## 1. The Gamma\u211d logDeriv split -/\n\n/-- The cpow factor as an exponential: \u03c0^(\u2212w/2) = exp(\u2212(log \u03c0)/2\u00b7w). -/\nlemma pi_cpow_neg_half_eq_exp (w : \u2102) :\n (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) ^ (-w / 2) = Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) := by\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero (by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero)]\n congr 1\n rw [\u2190 Complex.ofReal_log Real.pi_nonneg]\n ring_nf\n\n/-- The Gamma\u211d logDeriv split: for (1+s)/2 off the poles of \u0393,\n logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s) = \u2212(log \u03c0)/2 + (1/2)\u00b7\u03c8((1+s)/2). -/\nlemma logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add {s : \u2102}\n (hs : Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0)\n (hs2 : \u2200 m : \u2115, ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 -m) :\n logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s) =\n -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 + (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := by\n have hfun : Complex.Gamma\u211d = fun w : \u2102 =>\n Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) * Complex.Gamma (w / 2) := by\n funext w\n show Complex.Gamma\u211d w = _\n rw [Complex.Gamma\u211d_def]\n congr 1\n exact pi_cpow_neg_half_eq_exp w\n rw [hfun]\n have hdif1 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w))\n (1 + s) := by\n have h1 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) (1 + s) :=\n differentiableAt_id.const_mul _\n exact Complex.differentiableAt_exp.comp (1 + s) h1\n have hdif2 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) := by\n have h2 : DifferentiableAt \u2102 (fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) (1 + s) :=\n differentiableAt_id.div_const 2\n exact (Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma _ hs2).comp (1 + s) h2\n rw [logDeriv_mul (f := fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w))\n (g := fun w => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) (Complex.exp_ne_zero _) hs hdif1 hdif2]\n have h1 : logDeriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)) (1 + s) =\n -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 := by\n rw [logDeriv_apply]\n have hd : deriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)) (1 + s) =\n Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s)) * (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) := by\n have hh1 : HasDerivAt (fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w)\n (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) (1 + s) := by\n simpa using (hasDerivAt_id (1 + s)).const_mul (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2)\n have hh2 := (Complex.hasDerivAt_exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s))).comp (1 + s) hh1\n have heq : (Complex.exp \u2218 fun w : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) =\n fun w : \u2102 => Complex.exp (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * w) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hh2\n exact hh2.deriv\n rw [hd]\n field_simp [Complex.exp_ne_zero (-(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 * (1 + s))]\n have h2 : logDeriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) =\n (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := by\n rw [logDeriv_apply]\n have hd : deriv (fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2)) (1 + s) =\n deriv Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) * (1 / 2) := by\n have hh1 : HasDerivAt (fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) (1 / 2) (1 + s) := by\n simpa using (hasDerivAt_id (1 + s)).div_const (2 : \u2102)\n have hh2 := ((Complex.differentiableAt_Gamma _ hs2).hasDerivAt).comp (1 + s) hh1\n have heq : (Complex.Gamma \u2218 fun w : \u2102 => w / 2) = fun w : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma (w / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hh2\n exact hh2.deriv\n rw [hd, Complex.digamma_def, logDeriv_apply]\n field_simp [hs]\n rw [h1, h2]\n\n/-! ## 2. The j = 0 evaluation: \u03c4\u2080 = \u2212a\u2081 -/\n\n/-- log(4\u03c0) = 2\u00b7log 2 + log \u03c0. -/\nlemma log_four_pi : Real.log (4 * Real.pi) = 2 * Real.log 2 + Real.log Real.pi := by\n rw [Real.log_mul (by norm_num) (by positivity)]\n congr 1\n rw [show (4 : \u211d) = 2 ^ 2 from by norm_num, Real.log_pow]\n ring\n\n/-- **\u03c4\u2080** (D-066 \u00a74, j = 0): logDeriv Gamma\u211d 1 = \u2212(log 4\u03c0 + \u03b3)/2 = \u2212a\u2081. -/\ntheorem logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one :\n logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d 1 = -(lagariasA1 : \u2102) := by\n have hs : Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e, Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq]\n have hpi : (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) \u2260 0 := by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero hpi]\n exact Complex.exp_ne_zero _\n have hs2 : \u2200 m : \u2115, ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 -m := by\n intro m hm\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e] at hm\n have hre : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hm]\n simp at hre\n have hm0 : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n have h := logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add (s := 0) hs hs2\n rw [add_zero] at h\n rw [h]\n rw [Complex.digamma_one_half]\n rw [show Complex.log (2 : \u2102) = (Real.log 2 : \u2102) by\n rw [show (2 : \u2102) = ((2 : \u211d) : \u2102) by simp]\n exact (Complex.ofReal_log (by norm_num : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 2)).symm]\n rw [lagariasA1, log_four_pi]\n push_cast\n ring\n\n/-! ## 3. The full archimedean coefficient evaluation (all j) -/\n\n/-- The split's hypotheses hold on a neighbourhood of 0. -/\nlemma eventually_Gamma_ne_zero_and_pole_free :\n (\u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0) \u2227\n (\u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), \u2200 m : \u2115, (1 + s) / 2 \u2260 -(m : \u2102)) := by\n have hcont1 : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 := by\n have haffine : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 := by\n have h := (continuousAt_const.add continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => 1 + s) 0)\n simpa using h.div_const (2 : \u2102)\n have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : \u2102) / 2).re = (-(m : \u2102)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n have hcomp := hG.comp 0 haffine\n have heq : (Complex.Gamma \u2218 fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) =\n fun s => Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at hcomp\n exact hcomp\n have h1 : \u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), Complex.Gamma ((1 + s) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have hG1 : Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) \u2260 0 := by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e, Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq]\n have hpi : (\u2191Real.pi : \u2102) \u2260 0 := by exact_mod_cast Real.pi_ne_zero\n rw [Complex.cpow_def_of_ne_zero hpi]\n exact Complex.exp_ne_zero _\n exact hcont1.tendsto.eventually_ne hG1\n have h2 : \u2200\u1da0 s in \ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102), \u2200 m : \u2115, (1 + s) / 2 \u2260 -(m : \u2102) := by\n have hopen : IsOpen {s : \u2102 | 0 < (((1 + s) / 2).re)} := by\n have hcont : Continuous (fun s : \u2102 => (((1 + s) / 2).re)) := by\n have h1 : Continuous (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) :=\n (continuous_const.add continuous_id).div_const (2 : \u2102)\n exact Complex.continuous_re.comp h1\n exact isOpen_Ioi.preimage hcont\n have hmem : (0 : \u2102) \u2208 {s : \u2102 | 0 < (((1 + s) / 2).re)} := by\n show 0 < (((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2).re)\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n simp\n filter_upwards [hopen.mem_nhds hmem] with s hs\n intro m hmeq\n rw [hmeq] at hs\n simp at hs\n have hm : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (m : \u211d) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith\n exact \u27e8h1, h2\u27e9\n\n/-- **Piece (A), the archimedean Taylor coefficients (D-066 \u00a74)**: for all j,\n iteratedDeriv j (fun s => logDeriv Gamma\u211d (1+s)) 0 = (\u22121)^{j+1}\u00b7j!\u00b7\u2191lagariasA(j+1). -/\ntheorem iteratedDeriv_logDeriv_Gamma\u211d (j : \u2115) :\n iteratedDeriv j (fun s : \u2102 => logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s)) 0 =\n ((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d) := by\n rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos j with hj0 | hj0\n \u00b7 subst hj0\n rw [iteratedDeriv_zero]\n rw [lagariasA, if_pos rfl]\n simp [logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one]\n \u00b7 have hj : 1 \u2264 j := hj0\n obtain \u27e8hG, hpole\u27e9 := eventually_Gamma_ne_zero_and_pole_free\n have hev : (fun s : \u2102 => logDeriv Complex.Gamma\u211d (1 + s)) =\u1da0[\ud835\udcdd (0 : \u2102)]\n (fun s => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 + (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) := by\n filter_upwards [hG, hpole] with s h1 h2\n exact logDeriv_Gamma\u211d_one_add h1 h2\n rw [iteratedDeriv_congr_of_eventuallyEq hev]\n -- the constant dies for j \u2265 1\n have hsplit2 : (fun s : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2 +\n (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) =\n (fun _ : \u2102 => -(Real.log Real.pi : \u2102) / 2) +\n (fun s => (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) := rfl\n rw [hsplit2]\n have hcd0 : ContDiffAt \u2102 j (fun s => Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 := by\n have h1 : AnalyticAt \u2102 Complex.digamma ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : \u2102) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half\n have h2 : AnalyticAt \u2102 (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 :=\n (analyticAt_const.add analyticAt_id).div analyticAt_const (by norm_num)\n have h3 := AnalyticAt.comp h1 h2\n have heq : (Complex.digamma \u2218 (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2)) =\n fun s => Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2) := rfl\n rw [heq] at h3\n exact h3.contDiffAt\n have hcd : ContDiffAt \u2102 j (fun s => (1 / 2) * Complex.digamma ((1 + s) / 2)) 0 :=\n (contDiff_const (\ud835\udd5c := \u2102) (c := (1 / 2 : \u2102))).contDiffAt.mul hcd0\n rw [iteratedDeriv_add contDiff_const.contDiffAt hcd]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_const, if_neg (by omega : j \u2260 0), zero_add]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_const_mul (1 / 2 : \u2102) hcd0]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_one_add_div_two Complex.digamma j (by\n have e : (1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half) (by\n have hcont : Tendsto (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) (\ud835\udcdd 0) (\ud835\udcdd ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2)) := by\n have hc : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => (1 + s) / 2) 0 := by\n have h := (continuousAt_const.add continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt (fun s : \u2102 => 1 + s) 0)\n simpa using h.div_const (2 : \u2102)\n exact hc.tendsto\n have h1 : ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [h1] at hcont\n exact hcont.eventually ((digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half).eventually_analyticAt))]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by\n rw [show ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j = ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ (j + 1) from by\n rw [pow_succ]; ring]\n rw [\u2190 mul_pow]\n simp\n have hkey : (1 / 2 : \u2102) * ((1 / 2 : \u2102) ^ j *\n (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * ((2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)))) =\n ((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d) := by\n rw [show (1 / 2 : \u2102) * ((1 / 2 : \u2102) ^ j * (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) *\n ((2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)))) =\n (((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1)) *\n (((-1 : \u2102)) ^ (j + 1) * (j ! : \u2102) * (lagariasA (j + 1) : \u211d)) by ring]\n rw [h2pow]\n ring\n exact hkey\n",
"structuredPatch": [
{
"oldStart": 240,
"oldLines": 6,
"newStart": 240,
"newLines": 7,
"lines": [
" have h1 : ((1 + (0 : \u2102)) / 2) = 1 / 2 := by ring",
" rw [h1] at hcont",
" exact hcont.eventually ((digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half).eventually_analyticAt))]",
"+ rw [show ((1 : \u2102) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring]",
" rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]",
" have h2pow : ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j * (2 : \u2102) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by",
" rw [show ((1 : \u2102) / 2) * ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ j = ((1 : \u2102) / 2) ^ (j + 1) from by"
]
}
],
"userModified": false,
"replaceAll": false
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Line 155: `hG.comp 0 haffine` — ContinuousAt.comp (hf : ContinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) — hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1+0)/2) — the point ((1+0)/2) — the unifier against (g 0) with g := the affine from haffine — (fun s => (1+s)/2) 0 — beta → (1+0)/2 — hG's point — hmm — the error says haffine expected to have type ContinuousAt (HDiv.hDiv (1+0)) 2 — the SAME mis-unification (hG's point (1+0)/2 = HDiv.hDiv (1+0) 2 read as application of HDiv.hDiv (1+0) to 2!). Fix with comp_of_eq-style — but for ContinuousAt is there `ContinuousAt.comp_of_eq`? — there might not be. Alternative: hG's point as the application form: hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1+s)/2) 0):\n```lean\n have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n convert Complex.continuousAt_Gamma ((1 : ℂ) / 2) ?_ using 2 -- hmm\n```\nHmm — let me think about the cleanest way to get hG at the point `((fun s => (1+s)/2) 0)`: I need ContinuousAt Gamma at that point. The point (fun s => (1+s)/2) 0 = (1+0)/2 — and I want the hypothesis with the UNREDUCED application. Build via:\n```lean\n have hG0 : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1 : ℂ) / 2) := by\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n [the pole-free at 1/2]\n have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e] -- NO — this rewrites the GOAL's point from the application to 1/2 — wrong direction for what I want\n exact hG0\n```\nhmm — the rw [e] on the goal turns the goal's point into 1/2 — then exact hG0 ✓ — but then hG's STATED type has the application form ✓ — because the have's TYPE is fixed as written (the application) regardless of the proof's internal rewrites ✓✓. So:\n```lean\n have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n [the pole-free proof at 1/2]\n```\nWait — rw [e] on the goal `ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s => (1+s)/2) 0)` — e's LHS pattern is the application — rewrites it → ContinuousAt Gamma (1/2) ✓ then prove by Complex.continuousAt_Gamma with the pole-free at 1/2 ✓. The hG's stated type keeps the application form ✓ then `hG.comp 0 haffine` — the comp's (g 0) with g := haffine's function (fun s => (1+s)/2) — hG's point IS (fun s => (1+s)/2) 0 ✓ syntactic match ✓✓.\n\nSimilarly for the h1 in hcd0 — use the same convert-with-application-form trick:\n```lean\n have h1 : AnalyticAt ℂ Complex.digamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half\n```\nThe application form preserved ✓ then AnalyticAt.comp h1 h2 unifies f := (fun s => (1+s)/2) ✓.\n\nAnd line 239's `rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]` — pattern iteratedDeriv j digamma (1/2) — the goal has iteratedDeriv j digamma ((1+0)/2) — the point (1+0)/2 vs 1/2 — mismatch — normalize the goal's point first: the iteratedDeriv_one_add_div_two's conclusion has point ((1+s)/2) with s := 0 — (1+0)/2 — so the goal has digamma ((1+0)/2) — and the lemma's point is 1/2 — add a normalization: `rw [show ((1 : ℂ) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring]`? — wait — the goal's form is `digamma ((1 + 0) / 2)` — rewrite ((1+0)/2) → (1/2) via `rw [show ((1:ℂ) + 0)/2 = 1/2 from by ring]`?? — the pattern (1+0)/2 — hmm the goal's is digamma ((1 + 0) / 2) — the subterm (1+0)/2 — wait actually from the error at 239: the goal after iteratedDeriv_one_add_div_two shows `iteratedDeriv j digamma ((1 + 0) / 2)` — so the point is ((1+0)/2) — rewrite it: rw [show ((1 : ℂ) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring] — matches the subterm ✓ then the goal has digamma (1/2) ✓ then rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj] matches ✓.\n\nLet me apply all three fixes.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"Applying the application-form preservation fixes and the point normalization."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_576","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean","old_string":" have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2) := by\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m\n have e : (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2 := by ring\n rw [e]\n intro hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : ℂ) / 2).re = (-(m : ℂ)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (m : ℝ) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith","new_string":" have hG : ContinuousAt Complex.Gamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n apply Complex.continuousAt_Gamma\n intro m hcontra\n have h2 : ((1 : ℂ) / 2).re = (-(m : ℂ)).re := by rw [hcontra]\n simp at h2\n have hm : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (m : ℝ) := Nat.cast_nonneg m\n linarith"},"extra_content":null},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_577","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean","old_string":" have h1 : AnalyticAt ℂ Complex.digamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n convert digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half\n simp","new_string":" have h1 : AnalyticAt ℂ Complex.digamma ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) := by\n have e : ((fun s : ℂ => (1 + s) / 2) 0) = (1 : ℂ) / 2 := by\n show (1 + (0 : ℂ)) / 2 = 1 / 2\n ring\n rw [e]\n exact digamma_analyticOn _ dpsiDomain_half"},"extra_content":null},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_578","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiArchimedean.lean","old_string":" rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : ℂ) / 2) * ((1 : ℂ) / 2) ^ j * (2 : ℂ) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by","new_string":" rw [show ((1 : ℂ) + 0) / 2 = 1 / 2 from by ring]\n rw [iteratedDeriv_digamma_half_value j hj]\n have h2pow : ((1 : ℂ) / 2) * ((1 : ℂ) / 2) ^ j * (2 : ℂ) ^ (j + 1) = 1 := by"},"extra_content":null}]