Current task: —

← Session 24 — ii′-2…4: swaps, (4.10) design, contour + website roadmap fixes

#1219 assistant 2026-08-22 16:27:41.494 UTC · 483→526 tok open ⤢
thinking (1152 chars)
Session 022: ii′-5 — the R-bound. Per STATE.md NEXT ACTION: > Session 022: **ii′-5 — the R-bound** (D-064 R3, D-056: A = 10.5, B₀ = 48; the long pole, 2–3 sessions est.). Local route per D-064 §4 R3: Borel–Carathéodory (Mathlib has it) + Jensen (Mathlib) + Blaschke (Zeta23 StrongPNTPrefix); FE polynomial strip bound via riemannZeta_one_sub + Stirling; digamma Lemma D (D-039's true bound; D-056's reference-point proof). Target statement shape (D-036 §1): |ζ′/ζ(s) − Σ_{|γ−t|<1} 1/(s−ρ)| ≤ A·log(|t|+2) + B₀ on −3 ≤ σ ≤ 4, |t| ≥ 10. Design doc to consult first: D-064 §4 R3 + D-056 §0–2. This is the long pole (2–3 sessions estimated). This is a big analytic task. Let me start by reading the design docs carefully: 1. D-064 §4 R3 — the route inventory 2. D-056 §0–2 — the actual proof to formalize (the reference-point R-bound proof) 3. D-036 §1 — the statement shape Then check what Mathlib/Zeta23 provide (Borel–Carathéodory, Jensen, Blaschke) and plan the Lean factorization. This is genuinely a multi-session sub-stage. Per §8.5, I should break it into sub-stages with clean committed states. Let me first read the docs to scope it properly.
Starting session 022: ii′-5, the R-bound. First, the design docs — D-064 §4 R3 (route inventory) and D-056 (the proof to formalize).
tool: Read
input
{
  "file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\derivations\\D-064-tier-ii-prime-design.md",
  "limit": 30,
  "offset": 173
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Session 022: ii′-5 — the R-bound. Per STATE.md NEXT ACTION:\n\n> Session 022: **ii′-5 — the R-bound** (D-064 R3, D-056: A = 10.5, B₀ = 48; the long pole, 2–3 sessions est.). Local route per D-064 §4 R3: Borel–Carathéodory (Mathlib has it) + Jensen (Mathlib) + Blaschke (Zeta23 StrongPNTPrefix); FE polynomial strip bound via riemannZeta_one_sub + Stirling; digamma Lemma D (D-039's true bound; D-056's reference-point proof). Target statement shape (D-036 §1): |ζ′/ζ(s) − Σ_{|γ−t|<1} 1/(s−ρ)| ≤ A·log(|t|+2) + B₀ on −3 ≤ σ ≤ 4, |t| ≥ 10. Design doc to consult first: D-064 §4 R3 + D-056 §0–2.\n\nThis is the long pole (2–3 sessions estimated). This is a big analytic task. Let me start by reading the design docs carefully:\n1. D-064 §4 R3 — the route inventory\n2. D-056 §0–2 — the actual proof to formalize (the reference-point R-bound proof)\n3. D-036 §1 — the statement shape\n\nThen check what Mathlib/Zeta23 provide (Borel–Carathéodory, Jensen, Blaschke) and plan the Lean factorization.\n\nThis is genuinely a multi-session sub-stage. Per §8.5, I should break it into sub-stages with clean committed states. Let me first read the docs to scope it properly.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"Starting session 022: ii′-5, the R-bound. First, the design docs — D-064 §4 R3 (route inventory) and D-056 (the proof to formalize)."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Read_153","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\derivations\\D-064-tier-ii-prime-design.md","limit":30,"offset":173},"extra_content":null}]