← Session 28 — ii′-5e: partial-fraction identity (zero series + F entire)
thinking (3009 chars)
Line 1101-1104: in the y = s branch, after `subst hye` — wait: hye : y = s; `subst hye` — subst with hye : y = s eliminates... s is the lemma's outer variable — subst can only eliminate a local hypothesis variable, and s IS a local variable (the lemma's argument) — but subst hye : y = s tries to eliminate y (a local) or s (a local) — if it eliminates S (rewriting s := y everywhere), then all my later references to `s` are unknown! The error: unknown identifier s after subst — so subst eliminated s, replacing it with y. Then `𝓝 s` etc. fail. Fix: use `subst y` explicitly? `subst hye` picks based on the equation orientation... For hye : y = s, `subst hye` eliminates y if possible (y local ✓ — subst prefers... apparently it eliminated s). Use `subst y`?? subst takes the hypothesis or variable name: `subst y` eliminates y (needs y = s or s = y: hye : y = s ✓). Hmm — actually `subst hye` where hye : y = s: eliminates the VARIABLE y by default (subst h with h : x = t eliminates x)... it eliminated s instead?? The errors show s unknown — so s was eliminated. Because... both are locals; Lean's subst h with h : y = s tries to eliminate the LHS variable y — but maybe y couldn't be eliminated (y is... y IS local). Hmm whatever — the safe fix: don't subst; instead work with y and convert at the end. Replace `subst hye` with `rw [hye]`-style... The branch goal is Gentire y = W y with hye : y = s: I want to show Gentire y = W y via the limUnder at s. Restructure:
```lean
by_cases hye : y = s
· -- the center: limUnder = W s
haveI : ... (no haveI needed)
have hWcont : Tendsto W (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) := hW.continuousAt.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds
have hlim : Tendsto Fexpr (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) := Tendsto.congr' hWeq.symm hWcont
have hval : limUnder (𝓝[≠] s) Fexpr = W s :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_nhds_limUnder ⟨W s, hlim⟩) hlim
rw [hye]
exact hval -- goal Gentire s = W s; hval : limUnder ... = W s: defeq Gentire s ≡ limUnder ✓
```
rw [hye] : goal Gentire y = W y with hye : y = s: rewrites y → s: goal Gentire s = W s ✓ then hval (defeq ascription ✓). But wait — hye : y = s: rw [hye] rewrites y := s in the goal ✓ safe (no dependency issues for the goal).
Also the hWeq.symm error: `hWeq.symm` — hWeq's TYPE was shown as `∃ a ∈ 𝓝 y, ...` — because after the FIRST compile error (unknown s), hWeq got mis-elaborated... no — hWeq : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≠] s, Fexpr y = W y is fine; the error "Exists.symm" at hWeq — because hWeq got shadowed/mis-scoped after the subst removed s... The hWeq in context printed as the weird ∃-form — that's `Filter.EventuallyEq` UNFOLDED display? EventuallyEq f l g := ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x — the displayed `∃ a ∈ 𝓝 y, ∃ b ∈ 𝓟 {y}ᶜ, ...` is the Eventually (𝓝[≠]) unfolded — odd but that's just the display of the filter membership. The `.symm` failing with Exists.symm means hWeq elaborated to an ∃ — because... the subst chaos. Fix the subst and it should resolve.
Also `hWeq.symm` — EventuallyEq.symm : f =ᶠ[l] g → g =ᶠ[l] f ✓ exists.
The `subst hye` eliminated `s` instead of `y`. Fixing with a direct rewrite approach.
tool: Edit
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiFEntire.lean",
"old_string": " by_cases hye : y = s\n \u00b7 subst hye\n have hWcont : Tendsto W (\ud835\udcdd[\u2260] s) (\ud835\udcdd (W s)) :=\n hW.continuousAt.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds\n have hlim : Tendsto Fexpr (\ud835\udcdd[\u2260] s) (\ud835\udcdd (W s)) := Tendsto.congr' hWeq.symm hWcont\n show limUnder (\ud835\udcdd[\u2260] s) Fexpr = W s\n exact tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_nhds_limUnder \u27e8W s, hlim\u27e9) hlim\n \u00b7 have hygood : \u00ac badPoint y := hgood y h\u03b4\u2082y hye\n rw [gentire_eq_Fexpr hygood]\n exact hWeqBall y h\u03b5\u2081y hye",
"new_string": " by_cases hye : y = s\n \u00b7 have hWcont : Tendsto W (\ud835\udcdd[\u2260] s) (\ud835\udcdd (W s)) :=\n hW.continuousAt.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds\n have hlim : Tendsto Fexpr (\ud835\udcdd[\u2260] s) (\ud835\udcdd (W s)) := Tendsto.congr' hWeq.symm hWcont\n have hval : limUnder (\ud835\udcdd[\u2260] s) Fexpr = W s :=\n tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_nhds_limUnder \u27e8W s, hlim\u27e9) hlim\n rw [hye]\n exact hval\n \u00b7 have hygood : \u00ac badPoint y := hgood y h\u03b4\u2082y hye\n rw [gentire_eq_Fexpr hygood]\n exact hWeqBall y h\u03b5\u2081y hye"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Line 1101-1104: in the y = s branch, after `subst hye` — wait: hye : y = s; `subst hye` — subst with hye : y = s eliminates... s is the lemma's outer variable — subst can only eliminate a local hypothesis variable, and s IS a local variable (the lemma's argument) — but subst hye : y = s tries to eliminate y (a local) or s (a local) — if it eliminates S (rewriting s := y everywhere), then all my later references to `s` are unknown! The error: unknown identifier s after subst — so subst eliminated s, replacing it with y. Then `𝓝 s` etc. fail. Fix: use `subst y` explicitly? `subst hye` picks based on the equation orientation... For hye : y = s, `subst hye` eliminates y if possible (y local ✓ — subst prefers... apparently it eliminated s). Use `subst y`?? subst takes the hypothesis or variable name: `subst y` eliminates y (needs y = s or s = y: hye : y = s ✓). Hmm — actually `subst hye` where hye : y = s: eliminates the VARIABLE y by default (subst h with h : x = t eliminates x)... it eliminated s instead?? The errors show s unknown — so s was eliminated. Because... both are locals; Lean's subst h with h : y = s tries to eliminate the LHS variable y — but maybe y couldn't be eliminated (y is... y IS local). Hmm whatever — the safe fix: don't subst; instead work with y and convert at the end. Replace `subst hye` with `rw [hye]`-style... The branch goal is Gentire y = W y with hye : y = s: I want to show Gentire y = W y via the limUnder at s. Restructure: \n```lean\n by_cases hye : y = s\n · -- the center: limUnder = W s\n haveI : ... (no haveI needed)\n have hWcont : Tendsto W (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) := hW.continuousAt.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds\n have hlim : Tendsto Fexpr (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) := Tendsto.congr' hWeq.symm hWcont\n have hval : limUnder (𝓝[≠] s) Fexpr = W s :=\n tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_nhds_limUnder ⟨W s, hlim⟩) hlim\n rw [hye]\n exact hval -- goal Gentire s = W s; hval : limUnder ... = W s: defeq Gentire s ≡ limUnder ✓\n```\nrw [hye] : goal Gentire y = W y with hye : y = s: rewrites y → s: goal Gentire s = W s ✓ then hval (defeq ascription ✓). But wait — hye : y = s: rw [hye] rewrites y := s in the goal ✓ safe (no dependency issues for the goal).\n\nAlso the hWeq.symm error: `hWeq.symm` — hWeq's TYPE was shown as `∃ a ∈ 𝓝 y, ...` — because after the FIRST compile error (unknown s), hWeq got mis-elaborated... no — hWeq : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≠] s, Fexpr y = W y is fine; the error \"Exists.symm\" at hWeq — because hWeq got shadowed/mis-scoped after the subst removed s... The hWeq in context printed as the weird ∃-form — that's `Filter.EventuallyEq` UNFOLDED display? EventuallyEq f l g := ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x — the displayed `∃ a ∈ 𝓝 y, ∃ b ∈ 𝓟 {y}ᶜ, ...` is the Eventually (𝓝[≠]) unfolded — odd but that's just the display of the filter membership. The `.symm` failing with Exists.symm means hWeq elaborated to an ∃ — because... the subst chaos. Fix the subst and it should resolve.\n\nAlso `hWeq.symm` — EventuallyEq.symm : f =ᶠ[l] g → g =ᶠ[l] f ✓ exists.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The `subst hye` eliminated `s` instead of `y`. Fixing with a direct rewrite approach."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_214","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiFEntire.lean","old_string":" by_cases hye : y = s\n · subst hye\n have hWcont : Tendsto W (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) :=\n hW.continuousAt.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds\n have hlim : Tendsto Fexpr (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) := Tendsto.congr' hWeq.symm hWcont\n show limUnder (𝓝[≠] s) Fexpr = W s\n exact tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_nhds_limUnder ⟨W s, hlim⟩) hlim\n · have hygood : ¬ badPoint y := hgood y hδ₂y hye\n rw [gentire_eq_Fexpr hygood]\n exact hWeqBall y hε₁y hye","new_string":" by_cases hye : y = s\n · have hWcont : Tendsto W (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) :=\n hW.continuousAt.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds\n have hlim : Tendsto Fexpr (𝓝[≠] s) (𝓝 (W s)) := Tendsto.congr' hWeq.symm hWcont\n have hval : limUnder (𝓝[≠] s) Fexpr = W s :=\n tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_nhds_limUnder ⟨W s, hlim⟩) hlim\n rw [hye]\n exact hval\n · have hygood : ¬ badPoint y := hgood y hδ₂y hye\n rw [gentire_eq_Fexpr hygood]\n exact hWeqBall y hε₁y hye"},"extra_content":null}]