← Session 28 — ii′-5e: partial-fraction identity (zero series + F entire)
thinking (1952 chars)
Key facts:
- `exists_gapCircle_radius (hZC : ZeroCountProp) {k : ℕ} (hk : 1 ≤ k)`: R ∈ [4k+5/2, 4k+3], ℤ-clearance for R/2 ≥ 1/4, and the ordinate clearance: for every nontrivial zero ρ: 1/(16·C0hat(4k+9/2)) ≤ |ρ.im − R| OR 1 ≤ |ρ.im − R|.
IMPORTANT: the clearance is on |ρ.im − R| — only the UPPER half (positive im side, ordinate near +R). For the circle |s| = R, the strip-crossing points have im s = ±√(R²−re²) — the NEGATIVE side (im ≈ −R) is NOT covered by this! Hmm — but zeros come in conjugate pairs? No wait — IsNontrivialZero ρ with ρ.im near −R: the clearance for those comes from the conjugate zeros? zeroMult symmetry: is there a conj symmetry available? The zero set is conjugate-symmetric: ρ zero ⟹ ρ̄ zero (Mathlib: riemannZeta conj? `riemannZeta_conj : riemannZeta (conj s) = conj (riemannZeta s)` ✓ surely). So for a zero ρ with im ≈ −R: ρ̄ is a zero with im ≈ +R ⟹ clearance for ρ̄ ⟹ |ρ.im − (−R)| = ||im| ... |ρ.im + R| = |(−ρ.im) − R| = |(conj ρ).im − R| ≥ clearance ✓ — but the conj of a nontrivial zero is a zero with mult... and IsNontrivialZero (conj ρ) ✓ (re preserved, im negated, ζ(conj ρ) = conj(ζ ρ) = 0 ✓). So the circle bound at the lower crossing uses the conjugate zero's clearance ✓ fine — a small lemma: `IsNontrivialZero.conj` or find existing. LiReflect's sum_nearZeros_neg_reflect used ρ ↦ 1−ρ symmetry. For conj: check if Zeta23 has IsNontrivialZero conj symmetry — the ZetaSeam has reflect_zero (ρ ↦ 1−ρ̄?) — reflect := 1 − conj? Let me not guess; the direct conj lemma from riemannZeta_conj is a 5-liner.
Hmm wait — actually there's a subtlety: is `riemannZeta_conj` in Mathlib? `riemannZeta_conj : riemannZeta (conj s) = conj (riemannZeta s)` — I'm fairly confident it exists (or via `Complex.conj_riemannZeta`?). Check later.
Now C0hat — what is it? From LiContour (ii′-4): let me check its def and ZeroCountProp + zeroWindow. And two_le_C0hat exists ✓ (used above). Let me look at LiContour's key defs.
The circles give the ordinate clearance near +R (the conjugate symmetry will cover −R). Now the LiContour definitions (ZeroCountProp, C0hat, zeroWindow) and the 5c/5d capstones.
tool: Bash
input
{
"command": "cd D:/Python/Quantum/research/lean/NguyenRH1/NguyenRH1 && grep -n \"def C0hat\\|def ZeroCountProp\\|def zeroWindow\\|theorem two_le_C0hat\\|lemma two_le_C0hat\\|def nearZeros\" LiContour.lean LiDisc.lean LiReflect.lean | head -10 && grep -n -B2 -A8 \"def C0hat\" LiContour.lean && grep -n -B2 -A6 \"def ZeroCountProp\" LiContour.lean && grep -n -B2 -A6 \"def zeroWindow\" LiContour.lean",
"description": "C0hat, ZeroCountProp, zeroWindow definitions"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Key facts:\n- `exists_gapCircle_radius (hZC : ZeroCountProp) {k : ℕ} (hk : 1 ≤ k)`: R ∈ [4k+5/2, 4k+3], ℤ-clearance for R/2 ≥ 1/4, and the ordinate clearance: for every nontrivial zero ρ: 1/(16·C0hat(4k+9/2)) ≤ |ρ.im − R| OR 1 ≤ |ρ.im − R|. \n\nIMPORTANT: the clearance is on |ρ.im − R| — only the UPPER half (positive im side, ordinate near +R). For the circle |s| = R, the strip-crossing points have im s = ±√(R²−re²) — the NEGATIVE side (im ≈ −R) is NOT covered by this! Hmm — but zeros come in conjugate pairs? No wait — IsNontrivialZero ρ with ρ.im near −R: the clearance for those comes from the conjugate zeros? zeroMult symmetry: is there a conj symmetry available? The zero set is conjugate-symmetric: ρ zero ⟹ ρ̄ zero (Mathlib: riemannZeta conj? `riemannZeta_conj : riemannZeta (conj s) = conj (riemannZeta s)` ✓ surely). So for a zero ρ with im ≈ −R: ρ̄ is a zero with im ≈ +R ⟹ clearance for ρ̄ ⟹ |ρ.im − (−R)| = ||im| ... |ρ.im + R| = |(−ρ.im) − R| = |(conj ρ).im − R| ≥ clearance ✓ — but the conj of a nontrivial zero is a zero with mult... and IsNontrivialZero (conj ρ) ✓ (re preserved, im negated, ζ(conj ρ) = conj(ζ ρ) = 0 ✓). So the circle bound at the lower crossing uses the conjugate zero's clearance ✓ fine — a small lemma: `IsNontrivialZero.conj` or find existing. LiReflect's sum_nearZeros_neg_reflect used ρ ↦ 1−ρ symmetry. For conj: check if Zeta23 has IsNontrivialZero conj symmetry — the ZetaSeam has reflect_zero (ρ ↦ 1−ρ̄?) — reflect := 1 − conj? Let me not guess; the direct conj lemma from riemannZeta_conj is a 5-liner.\n\nHmm wait — actually there's a subtlety: is `riemannZeta_conj` in Mathlib? `riemannZeta_conj : riemannZeta (conj s) = conj (riemannZeta s)` — I'm fairly confident it exists (or via `Complex.conj_riemannZeta`?). Check later.\n\nNow C0hat — what is it? From LiContour (ii′-4): let me check its def and ZeroCountProp + zeroWindow. And two_le_C0hat exists ✓ (used above). Let me look at LiContour's key defs.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The circles give the ordinate clearance near +R (the conjugate symmetry will cover −R). Now the LiContour definitions (ZeroCountProp, C0hat, zeroWindow) and the 5c/5d capstones."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Bash_236","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd D:/Python/Quantum/research/lean/NguyenRH1/NguyenRH1 && grep -n \"def C0hat\\|def ZeroCountProp\\|def zeroWindow\\|theorem two_le_C0hat\\|lemma two_le_C0hat\\|def nearZeros\" LiContour.lean LiDisc.lean LiReflect.lean | head -10 && grep -n -B2 -A8 \"def C0hat\" LiContour.lean && grep -n -B2 -A6 \"def ZeroCountProp\" LiContour.lean && grep -n -B2 -A6 \"def zeroWindow\" LiContour.lean","description":"C0hat, ZeroCountProp, zeroWindow definitions"},"extra_content":null}]