← Session 28 — ii′-5e: partial-fraction identity (zero series + F entire)
thinking (2241 chars)
The pattern is fully banked in Zeta23. For my Dirichlet bound at re ≥ 2, the cleanest:
‖logDeriv ζ s‖ = ‖LSeries Λ s‖ ≤ ∑' n ‖LSeries.term Λ s n‖ ≤ ∑' n LSeries.term Λ 2 n (real, nonneg) = LSeries Λ 2 = −ζ′/ζ(2).
So: `norm_logDeriv_zeta_le_of_two_le_re : 2 ≤ s.re → ‖logDeriv riemannZeta s‖ ≤ −(deriv riemannZeta 2 / riemannZeta 2).re`-ish — or even simpler, bound by a CONCRETE constant: −ζ′/ζ(2) ≈ 0.56996 < 3/5. But proving −ζ′/ζ(2) ≤ 3/5 needs a numeric estimate of ζ(2) = π²/6 and ζ'(2)... Mathlib has riemannZeta_two : ζ 2 = π²/6 ✓; ζ'(2) numeric — NOT in Mathlib probably. Hmm. Alternative: keep the bound symbolic: ‖logDeriv ζ s‖ ≤ LSeries Λ 2 (as a real number) — for the squeeze I just need SOME s-independent bound. Actually cleaner: bound by `∑' n, ‖LSeries.term Λ 2 n‖`? Or state: ‖logDeriv ζ s‖ ≤ (LSeries (fun n => (Λ n : ℂ)) 2).re — hmm the .re. Let me define the constant C₂ := ∑' n, ‖LSeries.term (fun n => (Λ n:ℂ)) 2 n‖ — summable (LSeriesSummable_vonMangoldt at 2 > 1 ✓) — then:
`norm_logDeriv_zeta_le_dirichlet (hs : 2 ≤ s.re) : ‖logDeriv riemannZeta s‖ ≤ C₂`:
- −logDeriv ζ s = LSeries Λ s (re s > 1 ✓) — via LSeries_vonMangoldt_eq_deriv_riemannZeta_div: L ↗Λ s = −deriv ζ s/ζ s = −logDeriv ζ s (logDeriv_apply) ✓.
- ‖LSeries Λ s‖ ≤ ∑' n ‖LSeries.term Λ s n‖ (norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm + summable via LSeriesSummable_vonMangoldt at re > 1 ✓).
- ‖LSeries.term Λ s n‖ ≤ ‖LSeries.term Λ 2 n‖? — termwise: ‖Λ(n)·n^{−s}‖ = Λ(n)·n^{−re} ≤ Λ(n)·n^{−2} = ‖Λ(n)n^{−2}‖ (Λ ≥ 0, real terms positive) — via LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re (s := 2)?? — that lemma: `LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re (h : s.re ≤ s'.re)? : ‖LSeries.term f s' n‖ ≤ ‖LSeries.term f s n‖`?? — from the usage `LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re (s := σ₀) _ _ _` with goals `.re ≤ .re`... signature guess: (n) (h : s.re ≤ s'.re) (hf : f n...)? Let me check.
- Then ∑' n ‖term s n‖ ≤ ∑' n ‖term 2 n‖ = C₂ (Summable.tsum_mono or tsum_le_tsum ✓).
C₂ is a fixed real number — fine for the squeeze (constant).
Now — what value/form does `LSeries.term` take: LSeries.term f s n = f n / n^s (with 0^s junk?) — `LSeries.term_def`? And `LSeries.norm_term_eq` (used in VerticalLine.lean:178). And `LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re`. Let me check their signatures.
The Dirichlet-bound pattern is fully banked in Zeta23. Checking the `LSeries.term` API signatures.
tool: Bash
input
{
"command": "cd D:/Python/Quantum/zeta-23-lean/.lake/packages/mathlib && grep -rn \"theorem LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re\\|lemma LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re\\|theorem LSeries.norm_term_eq\\|lemma LSeries.norm_term_eq\\|def LSeries.term\\|theorem LSeries.def\" Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Basic.lean Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Convergence.lean 2>/dev/null | head -6 && grep -rn -A 6 \"norm_term_le_of_re_le_re\" Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Basic.lean | head -10",
"description": "LSeries.term API"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The pattern is fully banked in Zeta23. For my Dirichlet bound at re ≥ 2, the cleanest: \n\n‖logDeriv ζ s‖ = ‖LSeries Λ s‖ ≤ ∑' n ‖LSeries.term Λ s n‖ ≤ ∑' n LSeries.term Λ 2 n (real, nonneg) = LSeries Λ 2 = −ζ′/ζ(2).\n\nSo: `norm_logDeriv_zeta_le_of_two_le_re : 2 ≤ s.re → ‖logDeriv riemannZeta s‖ ≤ −(deriv riemannZeta 2 / riemannZeta 2).re`-ish — or even simpler, bound by a CONCRETE constant: −ζ′/ζ(2) ≈ 0.56996 < 3/5. But proving −ζ′/ζ(2) ≤ 3/5 needs a numeric estimate of ζ(2) = π²/6 and ζ'(2)... Mathlib has riemannZeta_two : ζ 2 = π²/6 ✓; ζ'(2) numeric — NOT in Mathlib probably. Hmm. Alternative: keep the bound symbolic: ‖logDeriv ζ s‖ ≤ LSeries Λ 2 (as a real number) — for the squeeze I just need SOME s-independent bound. Actually cleaner: bound by `∑' n, ‖LSeries.term Λ 2 n‖`? Or state: ‖logDeriv ζ s‖ ≤ (LSeries (fun n => (Λ n : ℂ)) 2).re — hmm the .re. Let me define the constant C₂ := ∑' n, ‖LSeries.term (fun n => (Λ n:ℂ)) 2 n‖ — summable (LSeriesSummable_vonMangoldt at 2 > 1 ✓) — then:\n\n`norm_logDeriv_zeta_le_dirichlet (hs : 2 ≤ s.re) : ‖logDeriv riemannZeta s‖ ≤ C₂`:\n- −logDeriv ζ s = LSeries Λ s (re s > 1 ✓) — via LSeries_vonMangoldt_eq_deriv_riemannZeta_div: L ↗Λ s = −deriv ζ s/ζ s = −logDeriv ζ s (logDeriv_apply) ✓.\n- ‖LSeries Λ s‖ ≤ ∑' n ‖LSeries.term Λ s n‖ (norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm + summable via LSeriesSummable_vonMangoldt at re > 1 ✓).\n- ‖LSeries.term Λ s n‖ ≤ ‖LSeries.term Λ 2 n‖? — termwise: ‖Λ(n)·n^{−s}‖ = Λ(n)·n^{−re} ≤ Λ(n)·n^{−2} = ‖Λ(n)n^{−2}‖ (Λ ≥ 0, real terms positive) — via LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re (s := 2)?? — that lemma: `LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re (h : s.re ≤ s'.re)? : ‖LSeries.term f s' n‖ ≤ ‖LSeries.term f s n‖`?? — from the usage `LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re (s := σ₀) _ _ _` with goals `.re ≤ .re`... signature guess: (n) (h : s.re ≤ s'.re) (hf : f n...)? Let me check.\n- Then ∑' n ‖term s n‖ ≤ ∑' n ‖term 2 n‖ = C₂ (Summable.tsum_mono or tsum_le_tsum ✓).\n\nC₂ is a fixed real number — fine for the squeeze (constant). \n\nNow — what value/form does `LSeries.term` take: LSeries.term f s n = f n / n^s (with 0^s junk?) — `LSeries.term_def`? And `LSeries.norm_term_eq` (used in VerticalLine.lean:178). And `LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re`. Let me check their signatures.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The Dirichlet-bound pattern is fully banked in Zeta23. Checking the `LSeries.term` API signatures."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Bash_242","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd D:/Python/Quantum/zeta-23-lean/.lake/packages/mathlib && grep -rn \"theorem LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re\\|lemma LSeries.norm_term_le_of_re_le_re\\|theorem LSeries.norm_term_eq\\|lemma LSeries.norm_term_eq\\|def LSeries.term\\|theorem LSeries.def\" Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Basic.lean Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Convergence.lean 2>/dev/null | head -6 && grep -rn -A 6 \"norm_term_le_of_re_le_re\" Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Basic.lean | head -10","description":"LSeries.term API"},"extra_content":null}]