← Session 28 — ii′-5e: partial-fraction identity (zero series + F entire)
thinking (3727 chars)
Wait — the last step has issues:
1. `(2:ℝ)^(j+1) = 2 * 2^j := by ring` — ring can't prove a^(j+1) = 2·a^j (that's pow_succ, not ring — exponent arithmetic isn't ring). Use `pow_succ'` or `pow_succ`: `pow_succ (2:ℝ) j : 2^(j+1) = 2^j * 2` — then hpow forms: (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2^j*2*X... Let me fix: `have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : ℝ) ^ j := by rw [pow_succ]; ring` — pow_succ : a^(n+1) = a^n * a ✓ then ring: 2^j * 2 = 2 * 2^j ✓.
2. The final linarith: goal after the calc-step rewrites: ↑(Ncount1) + ↑(Ncount2) ≤ A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * L: with h1' : N1 ≤ A₀(2^jX+2)L, h2' : N2 ≤ A₀(2^jX+1)L: sum ≤ A₀(2^{j+1}X+3)L ⟺ (2^jX+2)+(2^jX+1) = 2^{j+1}X+3 ⟺ 2·2^jX+3 ✓ — the goal's form A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * L — linarith must see A₀·(2^{j+1}X+3)·L as A₀·L·(2^{j+1}X+3)-monomial — the products are nonlinear (A₀·X·L·2^j...) — linarith treats A₀·2^{j+1}X·L as an atom vs the computed A₀·L·(2·(2^jX))+3·A₀·L — these are DIFFERENT monomials unless 2^{j+1}X is rewritten as 2·2^jX — via hpow : 2^{j+1}·X = 2·(2^j·X): `rw [hpow]`? The goal has (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X: rw [hpow] — hpow : 2^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X) — rewrites the goal's occurrence ✓ then linarith: goal A₀(2(2^jX)+3)L form — still nonlinear monomials: A₀·(2·(2^jX)+3)·L = 2·A₀·(2^jX)·L + 3A₀L and h1'+h2' sum: A₀(2^jX+2)L + A₀(2^jX+1)L = 2A₀(2^jX)L + 3A₀L ✓ — linarith's ring_nf normalization should match these as polynomials in atoms {A₀, 2^jX, L}: LHS-sum: 2A₀(2^jX)L+3A₀L ✓ RHS: A₀(2(2^jX)+3)L = 2A₀(2^jX)L + 3A₀L ✓ same polynomial ✓ linarith closes ✓ (linarith does ring_nf preprocessing ✓). But I need the rw [hpow] at the GOAL first — the goal is inside the calc step: `≤ A0count * ((2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X + 3) * Real.log (...)`: rw [hpow] — wait hpow as I defined it: (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X): the goal's subterm (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X ✓ rw fires ✓. But then the log argument 3*2^(j+1)*X+5 — unchanged (hpow's LHS doesn't match inside log because log's arg has 3*2^(j+1)*X — the pattern 2^(j+1)*X DOES appear there: rw [hpow] rewrites ALL occurrences including inside log — the goal becomes ... * Real.log (3 * (2*(2^j*X)) + 5): and h1'/h2' have Real.log (3 * 2^(j+1)*X + 5) — MISMATCH after the rw! Damn. Fix: don't rw the goal; instead linarith with hpow in the list: linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos, hpow]?? linarith doesn't rewrite with hpow (it's an equality between compound terms — linarith treats 2^(j+1)*X and 2^j*X as separate atoms and hpow relates them LINEARLY: hpow : 2^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X) — linear in the atoms {2^(j+1)*X, 2^j*X} ✓ linarith uses it ✓ but the PRODUCTS A₀·2^{j+1}X·L: as monomials {A₀, 2^{j+1}X, L} vs {A₀, 2^jX, L}: ring_nf-normalized with hpow as a linear relation between atom-choices — linarith's preprocessing does ring_nf FIRST (normalizing monomials) then treats distinct monomials as atoms and uses hpow as a linear equation between the monomial-atoms? hpow's LHS/RHS are themselves atoms (not monomials of other atoms — 2^(j+1)*X IS a monomial 2^(j+1)·X). Hmm — ring_nf normalizes hpow to 2^(j+1)*X − 2*2^j*X = 0 — a linear relation between monomials 2^(j+1)*X and 2^j*X ✓ linarith handles linear relations between monomial atoms ✓. And the goal/h1'/h2' normalize to monomials in {A₀, 2^(j+1)*X, 2^j*X, L} with hpow relating ✓ should close. OK keep `linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos, hpow]` — add hpow to the list. But careful — I defined hpow as `(2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X)` via `by ring` — WRONG (pow not ring). Fix hpow's proof: `by rw [pow_succ]; ring` — pow_succ : a^(n+1) = a^n * a: rewrites 2^(j+1) → 2^j * 2: goal 2^j*2*X = 2*(2^j*X): ring ✓.
Also the two hpow's inside hlen1/hlen2 have the same issue — fix them too: `have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : ℝ) ^ j := by ring` — replace with `pow_succ` + ring.
Let me fix these.
The `by ring` for power identities needs `pow_succ`. Fixing the three spots.
tool: Bash
input
{
"command": "cd D:/Python/Quantum && python - << 'PYEOF'\np = 'research/lean/NguyenRH1/NguyenRH1/LiCircleBound.lean'\nsrc = open(p, encoding='utf-8').read()\nsrc = src.replace(\"\"\" have hpow : (2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : \u211d) ^ j := by ring\n rw [hpow]\n ring\"\"\", \"\"\" have hpow : (2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : \u211d) ^ j := by rw [pow_succ']; ring\n rw [hpow]\n ring\"\"\")\nsrc = src.replace(\"\"\" have hpow : (2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) * X = 2 * ((2 : \u211d) ^ j * X) := by ring\n linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos]\"\"\", \"\"\" have hpow : (2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) * X = 2 * ((2 : \u211d) ^ j * X) := by rw [pow_succ']; ring\n linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos, hpow]\"\"\")\nopen(p, 'w', encoding='utf-8').write(src)\nprint('done')\nPYEOF",
"description": "Fix pow_succ usages"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Wait — the last step has issues:\n1. `(2:ℝ)^(j+1) = 2 * 2^j := by ring` — ring can't prove a^(j+1) = 2·a^j (that's pow_succ, not ring — exponent arithmetic isn't ring). Use `pow_succ'` or `pow_succ`: `pow_succ (2:ℝ) j : 2^(j+1) = 2^j * 2` — then hpow forms: (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2^j*2*X... Let me fix: `have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : ℝ) ^ j := by rw [pow_succ]; ring` — pow_succ : a^(n+1) = a^n * a ✓ then ring: 2^j * 2 = 2 * 2^j ✓.\n2. The final linarith: goal after the calc-step rewrites: ↑(Ncount1) + ↑(Ncount2) ≤ A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * L: with h1' : N1 ≤ A₀(2^jX+2)L, h2' : N2 ≤ A₀(2^jX+1)L: sum ≤ A₀(2^{j+1}X+3)L ⟺ (2^jX+2)+(2^jX+1) = 2^{j+1}X+3 ⟺ 2·2^jX+3 ✓ — the goal's form A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * L — linarith must see A₀·(2^{j+1}X+3)·L as A₀·L·(2^{j+1}X+3)-monomial — the products are nonlinear (A₀·X·L·2^j...) — linarith treats A₀·2^{j+1}X·L as an atom vs the computed A₀·L·(2·(2^jX))+3·A₀·L — these are DIFFERENT monomials unless 2^{j+1}X is rewritten as 2·2^jX — via hpow : 2^{j+1}·X = 2·(2^j·X): `rw [hpow]`? The goal has (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X: rw [hpow] — hpow : 2^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X) — rewrites the goal's occurrence ✓ then linarith: goal A₀(2(2^jX)+3)L form — still nonlinear monomials: A₀·(2·(2^jX)+3)·L = 2·A₀·(2^jX)·L + 3A₀L and h1'+h2' sum: A₀(2^jX+2)L + A₀(2^jX+1)L = 2A₀(2^jX)L + 3A₀L ✓ — linarith's ring_nf normalization should match these as polynomials in atoms {A₀, 2^jX, L}: LHS-sum: 2A₀(2^jX)L+3A₀L ✓ RHS: A₀(2(2^jX)+3)L = 2A₀(2^jX)L + 3A₀L ✓ same polynomial ✓ linarith closes ✓ (linarith does ring_nf preprocessing ✓). But I need the rw [hpow] at the GOAL first — the goal is inside the calc step: `≤ A0count * ((2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X + 3) * Real.log (...)`: rw [hpow] — wait hpow as I defined it: (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X): the goal's subterm (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X ✓ rw fires ✓. But then the log argument 3*2^(j+1)*X+5 — unchanged (hpow's LHS doesn't match inside log because log's arg has 3*2^(j+1)*X — the pattern 2^(j+1)*X DOES appear there: rw [hpow] rewrites ALL occurrences including inside log — the goal becomes ... * Real.log (3 * (2*(2^j*X)) + 5): and h1'/h2' have Real.log (3 * 2^(j+1)*X + 5) — MISMATCH after the rw! Damn. Fix: don't rw the goal; instead linarith with hpow in the list: linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos, hpow]?? linarith doesn't rewrite with hpow (it's an equality between compound terms — linarith treats 2^(j+1)*X and 2^j*X as separate atoms and hpow relates them LINEARLY: hpow : 2^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X) — linear in the atoms {2^(j+1)*X, 2^j*X} ✓ linarith uses it ✓ but the PRODUCTS A₀·2^{j+1}X·L: as monomials {A₀, 2^{j+1}X, L} vs {A₀, 2^jX, L}: ring_nf-normalized with hpow as a linear relation between atom-choices — linarith's preprocessing does ring_nf FIRST (normalizing monomials) then treats distinct monomials as atoms and uses hpow as a linear equation between the monomial-atoms? hpow's LHS/RHS are themselves atoms (not monomials of other atoms — 2^(j+1)*X IS a monomial 2^(j+1)·X). Hmm — ring_nf normalizes hpow to 2^(j+1)*X − 2*2^j*X = 0 — a linear relation between monomials 2^(j+1)*X and 2^j*X ✓ linarith handles linear relations between monomial atoms ✓. And the goal/h1'/h2' normalize to monomials in {A₀, 2^(j+1)*X, 2^j*X, L} with hpow relating ✓ should close. OK keep `linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos, hpow]` — add hpow to the list. But careful — I defined hpow as `(2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X)` via `by ring` — WRONG (pow not ring). Fix hpow's proof: `by rw [pow_succ]; ring` — pow_succ : a^(n+1) = a^n * a: rewrites 2^(j+1) → 2^j * 2: goal 2^j*2*X = 2*(2^j*X): ring ✓.\n\nAlso the two hpow's inside hlen1/hlen2 have the same issue — fix them too: `have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : ℝ) ^ j := by ring` — replace with `pow_succ` + ring.\n\nLet me fix these.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The `by ring` for power identities needs `pow_succ`. Fixing the three spots."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Bash_384","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd D:/Python/Quantum && python - << 'PYEOF'\np = 'research/lean/NguyenRH1/NguyenRH1/LiCircleBound.lean'\nsrc = open(p, encoding='utf-8').read()\nsrc = src.replace(\"\"\" have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : ℝ) ^ j := by ring\n rw [hpow]\n ring\"\"\", \"\"\" have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) = 2 * (2 : ℝ) ^ j := by rw [pow_succ']; ring\n rw [hpow]\n ring\"\"\")\nsrc = src.replace(\"\"\" have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) * X = 2 * ((2 : ℝ) ^ j * X) := by ring\n linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos]\"\"\", \"\"\" have hpow : (2 : ℝ) ^ (j + 1) * X = 2 * ((2 : ℝ) ^ j * X) := by rw [pow_succ']; ring\n linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos, hpow]\"\"\")\nopen(p, 'w', encoding='utf-8').write(src)\nprint('done')\nPYEOF","description":"Fix pow_succ usages"},"extra_content":null}]