Current task: —

← Session 28 — ii′-5e: partial-fraction identity (zero series + F entire)

#1575 assistant 2026-08-23 19:51:47.361 UTC · 1220→1672 tok open ⤢
thinking (3794 chars)
The context shows hpow (not hpowX — there's a duplicate; the file has both hpowX at the top and hpow near the end — from my earlier sed which added `have hpow : (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X) := by rw [pow_succ']; ring` before the linarith). Both exist ✓. So why does linarith fail? The hypotheses are all there: h1' : N1 ≤ A₀(2^jX+2)L, h2' : N2 ≤ A₀(2^jX+1)L, hpow : 2^{j+1}X = 2·2^jX, goal N1+N2 ≤ A₀(2^{j+1}X+3)L. The issue must be the products: `A0count * (2^j*X + 2) * Real.log (...)` — linarith ring-normalizes: (A0count·(2^jX+2))·L = A0count·L·(2^jX) + 2·A0count·L — wait the multiplication order: `A0count * (2^j*X+2) * Real.log(...)` parses as `(A0count * (2^j*X+2)) * Real.log(...)` ✓. And the goal's `A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * Real.log(...)`. For linarith to close: it needs (as monomials in atoms {A₀, 2^jX, 2^{j+1}X, L}): LHS-diff: N1+N2 − A₀(2^{j+1}X+3)L... with hpow relating the atoms 2^{j+1}X and 2^jX ✓. This should be straightforward for linarith... UNLESS the hpow's two sides are NOT seen as linearly related monomials because linarith normalizes `2 ^ (j + 1) * X` and `2 ^ j * X` — hmm `2 ^ (j+1)` has exponent j+1 (a variable) — the ring normalizer can't expand 2^(j+1) into 2·2^j automatically, so 2^(j+1) and 2^j are unrelated atoms, and hpow : 2^(j+1)·X = 2·(2^j·X) is the needed relation ✓ linarith should use it. Hmm — wait, actually: linarith's preprocessing treats hpow as a linear equation between the atoms `{2^(j+1)*X}` and `{2^j*X}` — but ARE those atoms or monomials? `2^(j+1)*X` is the product of `2^(j+1)` and X — a DEGREE-2 monomial — linarith's ring_nf treats each distinct monomial as an atom: atoms here: 2^(j+1)·X (monomial), 2^j·X (monomial), A₀, L, and the compounds A₀·2^{j+1}X·L (degree 3!), A₀·2^jX·L (degree 3) — wait NO — the goal/hypotheses contain products like A0count * (2^j*X + 2) * L — ring_nf expands: A₀·2^jX·L + 2·A₀·L — the monomials A₀·2^jX·L (degree 3, atom) and A₀·L (degree 2, atom) and A₀·2^{j+1}X·L (degree 3, atom) — the relation between A₀·2^{j+1}X·L and A₀·2^jX·L is NOT linear (they're both atoms; hpow relates 2^{j+1}X to 2^jX but NOT their A₀L-multiples). linarith does NOT multiply hpow by A₀·L — it only takes linear combinations of hypotheses — the needed step: A₀·2^{j+1}X·L = 2·A₀·2^jX·L requires multiplying hpow by A₀·L — NONLINEAR. linarith CAN'T. That's the failure. Fix: rewrite the goal FIRST using hpow so the atoms align: rw [hpow] at the goal — the goal's `2 ^ (j + 1) * X` appears in `A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * Real.log (3 * 2^(j+1)*X + 5)` — TWO places (the +3 factor and inside log). If I rw [hpow] at goal — rewrites both occurrences: the log becomes log(3·(2·2^jX)+5) — but h1'/h2' have log(3·2^{j+1}X+5) — MISMATCH again. Fix: rw [hpow] at h1' h2' as well (turning their logs into the 2·2^jX form) AND the goal — then all have log(3·(2·2^jX)+5) ✓ and the products: goal A₀(2·2^jX+3)L vs h1'+h2' A₀(2^jX+2)L + A₀(2^jX+1)L — now all monomials in {A₀, 2^jX, L} ✓ linarith closes ✓. But wait — hpow : 2^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X): rw [hpow] at h1' — h1' has `Real.log (3 * 2^(j+1)*X + 5)` — the pattern 2^(j+1)*X appears there ✓ and in the (2^(j+1)*X + ...)? h1' : N1 ≤ A₀·(2^jX+2)·L — no 2^{j+1}X there! Only in the log. So rw [hpow] at h1' turns its log into log(3·(2·2^jX)+5) ✓. Same h2' ✓. And the goal: rw [hpow] — turns BOTH 2^{j+1}X occurrences into 2·2^jX ✓ — then all aligned ✓ linarith [h1', h2'] + nonnegs. Hmm — but the current code has hpow defined AFTER h1'/h2' and the linarith references hpow. Let me restructure the final block: move hpow earlier, rw at h1' h2' and the goal... the goal is the calc's last-step target — inside the by block it's the current goal ✓ rw [hpow] works on the goal by default. Also delete the duplicate hpowX (keep one name). Let me view and edit the final block.
The final linarith can't multiply `hpow` by A₀·L (nonlinear). Fixing by rewriting with `hpow` in the goal and both bounds so all monomials align.
tool: Read ok
input
{
  "file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiCircleBound.lean",
  "offset": 630,
  "limit": 22
}
result 2026-08-23 19:51:47Z → 2026-08-23 19:51:47Z
{
  "type": "text",
  "file": {
    "filePath": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiCircleBound.lean",
    "content": "          ring\n        rw [hlen1] at h1\n        rw [hlen2] at h2\n        -- assemble: A\u2080(2^jX+2)L + A\u2080(2^jX+1)L = A\u2080(2^{j+1}X+3)L\n        have hA0 := A0count_pos.le\n        have h1' : (Zeta23.Ncount ((2 : \u211d) ^ j * X - 1) ((2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) * X) : \u211d)\n            \u2264 A0count * ((2 : \u211d) ^ j * X + 2) * Real.log (3 * (2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) * X + 5) :=\n          h1.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hlog1 (by positivity))\n        have h2' : (Zeta23.Ncount (-((2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) * X)) (-((2 : \u211d) ^ j * X)) : \u211d)\n            \u2264 A0count * ((2 : \u211d) ^ j * X + 1) * Real.log (3 * (2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) * X + 5) :=\n          h2.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hlog2 (by positivity))\n        have hpow : (2 : \u211d) ^ (j + 1) * X = 2 * ((2 : \u211d) ^ j * X) := by rw [pow_succ']; ring\n        linarith [h1', h2', hA0, hlogpos, hpow]\n\nend NguyenRH1\n\nend",
    "numLines": 17,
    "startLine": 630,
    "totalLines": 646
  }
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The context shows hpow (not hpowX — there's a duplicate; the file has both hpowX at the top and hpow near the end — from my earlier sed which added `have hpow : (2:ℝ)^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X) := by rw [pow_succ']; ring` before the linarith). Both exist ✓.\n\nSo why does linarith fail? The hypotheses are all there: h1' : N1 ≤ A₀(2^jX+2)L, h2' : N2 ≤ A₀(2^jX+1)L, hpow : 2^{j+1}X = 2·2^jX, goal N1+N2 ≤ A₀(2^{j+1}X+3)L. \n\nThe issue must be the products: `A0count * (2^j*X + 2) * Real.log (...)` — linarith ring-normalizes: (A0count·(2^jX+2))·L = A0count·L·(2^jX) + 2·A0count·L — wait the multiplication order: `A0count * (2^j*X+2) * Real.log(...)` parses as `(A0count * (2^j*X+2)) * Real.log(...)` ✓. And the goal's `A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * Real.log(...)`. For linarith to close: it needs (as monomials in atoms {A₀, 2^jX, 2^{j+1}X, L}): LHS-diff: N1+N2 − A₀(2^{j+1}X+3)L... with hpow relating the atoms 2^{j+1}X and 2^jX ✓. This should be straightforward for linarith... UNLESS the hpow's two sides are NOT seen as linearly related monomials because linarith normalizes `2 ^ (j + 1) * X` and `2 ^ j * X` — hmm `2 ^ (j+1)` has exponent j+1 (a variable) — the ring normalizer can't expand 2^(j+1) into 2·2^j automatically, so 2^(j+1) and 2^j are unrelated atoms, and hpow : 2^(j+1)·X = 2·(2^j·X) is the needed relation ✓ linarith should use it.\n\nHmm — wait, actually: linarith's preprocessing treats hpow as a linear equation between the atoms `{2^(j+1)*X}` and `{2^j*X}` — but ARE those atoms or monomials? `2^(j+1)*X` is the product of `2^(j+1)` and X — a DEGREE-2 monomial — linarith's ring_nf treats each distinct monomial as an atom: atoms here: 2^(j+1)·X (monomial), 2^j·X (monomial), A₀, L, and the compounds A₀·2^{j+1}X·L (degree 3!), A₀·2^jX·L (degree 3) — wait NO — the goal/hypotheses contain products like A0count * (2^j*X + 2) * L — ring_nf expands: A₀·2^jX·L + 2·A₀·L — the monomials A₀·2^jX·L (degree 3, atom) and A₀·L (degree 2, atom) and A₀·2^{j+1}X·L (degree 3, atom) — the relation between A₀·2^{j+1}X·L and A₀·2^jX·L is NOT linear (they're both atoms; hpow relates 2^{j+1}X to 2^jX but NOT their A₀L-multiples). linarith does NOT multiply hpow by A₀·L — it only takes linear combinations of hypotheses — the needed step: A₀·2^{j+1}X·L = 2·A₀·2^jX·L requires multiplying hpow by A₀·L — NONLINEAR. linarith CAN'T. That's the failure.\n\nFix: rewrite the goal FIRST using hpow so the atoms align: rw [hpow] at the goal — the goal's `2 ^ (j + 1) * X` appears in `A0count * (2^(j+1)*X + 3) * Real.log (3 * 2^(j+1)*X + 5)` — TWO places (the +3 factor and inside log). If I rw [hpow] at goal — rewrites both occurrences: the log becomes log(3·(2·2^jX)+5) — but h1'/h2' have log(3·2^{j+1}X+5) — MISMATCH again. Fix: rw [hpow] at h1' h2' as well (turning their logs into the 2·2^jX form) AND the goal — then all have log(3·(2·2^jX)+5) ✓ and the products: goal A₀(2·2^jX+3)L vs h1'+h2' A₀(2^jX+2)L + A₀(2^jX+1)L — now all monomials in {A₀, 2^jX, L} ✓ linarith closes ✓.\n\nBut wait — hpow : 2^(j+1)*X = 2*(2^j*X): rw [hpow] at h1' — h1' has `Real.log (3 * 2^(j+1)*X + 5)` — the pattern 2^(j+1)*X appears there ✓ and in the (2^(j+1)*X + ...)? h1' : N1 ≤ A₀·(2^jX+2)·L — no 2^{j+1}X there! Only in the log. So rw [hpow] at h1' turns its log into log(3·(2·2^jX)+5) ✓. Same h2' ✓. And the goal: rw [hpow] — turns BOTH 2^{j+1}X occurrences into 2·2^jX ✓ — then all aligned ✓ linarith [h1', h2'] + nonnegs.\n\nHmm — but the current code has hpow defined AFTER h1'/h2' and the linarith references hpow. Let me restructure the final block: move hpow earlier, rw at h1' h2' and the goal... the goal is the calc's last-step target — inside the by block it's the current goal ✓ rw [hpow] works on the goal by default.\n\nAlso delete the duplicate hpowX (keep one name). Let me view and edit the final block.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The final linarith can't multiply `hpow` by A₀·L (nonlinear). Fixing by rewriting with `hpow` in the goal and both bounds so all monomials align."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Read_405","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiCircleBound.lean","offset":630,"limit":22},"extra_content":null}]