← Session 29 — ii′-5e-v: circle bound (far-tail + series bounds)
thinking (2746 chars)
Two things:
1. Line 3290 (hdist's final linarith): the goal is h4's statement `|(m:ℝ) − R/2| − (s.re/2+R/2) ≤ |s.re/2+(m:ℝ)|` — WAIT the error is at 3290:10 with a✝ : |s.re/2+↑m| < |↑m−R/2| − (s.re/2+R/2) — that's h4's GOAL (negated) — the failure is INSIDE h4's proof: `linarith [h7, h8]`. h7 : |s.re/2+↑m| − |s.re/2+R/2| ≤ |↑m−R/2| — hmm! The abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub I used: abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub (a b) : |a| − |b| ≤ |a − b| — with a := s.re/2+↑m, b := s.re/2+R/2: gives |a|−|b| ≤ |a−b| = |↑m−R/2| — that's |x|−|y| ≤ |m−R/2| — and h4's goal: |m−R/2| − y ≤ |x|: from |x|−|y|... wait: h7 : |x| − |y| ≤ |m−R/2| where x := s.re/2+↑m, y := s.re/2+R/2: goal: |↑m−R/2| − y ≤ |x| with y = s.re/2+R/2 ≥ 0 (h8 : |y| = y): from h7: |x| ≤ |m−R/2| + |y| — wrong direction!!! I need |m−R/2| − y ≤ |x| ⟺ |m−R/2| ≤ |x| + y: and h7 gives |x| ≤ |m−R/2| + y. WRONG DIRECTION. The correct inequality: |m−R/2| = |(s.re/2+↑m) − (s.re/2+R/2)| ≥ |s.re/2+↑m| − |s.re/2+R/2| — I have exactly that as h7 — |x|−|y| ≤ |m−R/2| ⟹ |m−R/2| ≥ |x|−|y| ⟹ |m−R/2| + |y| ≥ |x|... no wait: goal: |m−R/2| − y ≤ |x| ⟺ |m−R/2| ≤ |x| + y ⟺ ... from h7 : |x| − y ≤ |m−R/2| (h8): |x| − y ≤ |m−R/2| ⟹ |m−R/2| ≥ |x| − y ⟹ |m−R/2| + y ≥ |x| — STILL wrong direction!! I mixed myself up. What I actually need: |x + m| = |(m−R/2) + (x+R/2)| ≥ |m−R/2| − (x+R/2) — the REVERSE triangle on the SUM: |A + B| ≥ |A| − |B| with A := m−R/2, B := x+R/2: |A+B| ≥ |A|−|B| ✓. |A|−|B| ≤ |A+B| is `abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub A (−B)`? |A − (−B)| = |A+B| and |A|−|−B| = |A|−|B|: abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub A (−B) : |A| − |−B| ≤ |A − (−B)| = |A+B| ✓. So:
```
have h7 := abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub ((m : ℝ) - R / 2) (-(s.re / 2 + R / 2))
rw [abs_neg, sub_neg_eq_add] at h7
-- h7 : |(m : ℝ) - R / 2| - |s.re / 2 + R / 2| ≤ |(m : ℝ) - R / 2 + (s.re / 2 + R / 2)|
-- and (m−R/2) + (s.re/2+R/2) = s.re/2 + m (ring)
have h5 : (m : ℝ) - R / 2 + (s.re / 2 + R / 2) = s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ) := by ring
rw [h5] at h7
-- h7 : |m − R/2| − |s.re/2+R/2| ≤ |s.re/2 + m|
-- with h8 : |s.re/2+R/2| = s.re/2+R/2: h4 follows by linarith [h7, h8]
```
✓ that's the right direction. My earlier h5/h7 had it backwards (I applied abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub to (x+m) and (x+R/2) getting |x+m|−|x+R/2| ≤ |m−R/2| — which is TRUE but the wrong direction for h4).
Hmm wait — but actually h4's goal was written as `|(m:ℝ) − R/2| − (s.re/2+R/2) ≤ |s.re/2+(m:ℝ)|` — and the current (broken) attempt had h7 : |x|−|y| ≤ |m−R/2| — from which the goal does NOT follow. The a✝ shows the negation of h4's goal ✓ consistent. Fix per above.
2. The simp warnings for hre/him2 (Complex.div_re/div_im unused) — the simp closed them via other lemmas (probably div_ofNat or ofNat lemmas fired automatically). Clean: change `simp [Complex.div_re]` → `simp`, same for div_im.
`h7` had the reverse-triangle in the wrong direction. Fixing with `abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub A (−B)`, and the simp-arg warnings.
tool: Edit
input
{
"replace_all": false,
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiCircleBound.lean",
"old_string": " have h4 : |(m : \u211d) - R / 2| - (s.re / 2 + R / 2) \u2264 |s.re / 2 + (m : \u211d)| := by\n have h5 : |(s.re / 2 + (m : \u211d)) - (s.re / 2 + R / 2)| = |(m : \u211d) - R / 2| := by\n have h6 : (s.re / 2 + (m : \u211d)) - (s.re / 2 + R / 2) = (m : \u211d) - R / 2 := by ring\n rw [h6]\n have h7 := abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub (s.re / 2 + (m : \u211d)) (s.re / 2 + R / 2)\n rw [h5] at h7\n have h8 : |s.re / 2 + R / 2| = s.re / 2 + R / 2 := abs_of_nonneg hge\n linarith [h7, h8]",
"new_string": " have h4 : |(m : \u211d) - R / 2| - (s.re / 2 + R / 2) \u2264 |s.re / 2 + (m : \u211d)| := by\n have h7 := abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub ((m : \u211d) - R / 2) (-(s.re / 2 + R / 2))\n rw [abs_neg, sub_neg_eq_add] at h7\n have h5 : (m : \u211d) - R / 2 + (s.re / 2 + R / 2) = s.re / 2 + (m : \u211d) := by ring\n rw [h5] at h7\n have h8 : |s.re / 2 + R / 2| = s.re / 2 + R / 2 := abs_of_nonneg hge\n linarith [h7, h8]"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Two things:\n\n1. Line 3290 (hdist's final linarith): the goal is h4's statement `|(m:ℝ) − R/2| − (s.re/2+R/2) ≤ |s.re/2+(m:ℝ)|` — WAIT the error is at 3290:10 with a✝ : |s.re/2+↑m| < |↑m−R/2| − (s.re/2+R/2) — that's h4's GOAL (negated) — the failure is INSIDE h4's proof: `linarith [h7, h8]`. h7 : |s.re/2+↑m| − |s.re/2+R/2| ≤ |↑m−R/2| — hmm! The abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub I used: abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub (a b) : |a| − |b| ≤ |a − b| — with a := s.re/2+↑m, b := s.re/2+R/2: gives |a|−|b| ≤ |a−b| = |↑m−R/2| — that's |x|−|y| ≤ |m−R/2| — and h4's goal: |m−R/2| − y ≤ |x|: from |x|−|y|... wait: h7 : |x| − |y| ≤ |m−R/2| where x := s.re/2+↑m, y := s.re/2+R/2: goal: |↑m−R/2| − y ≤ |x| with y = s.re/2+R/2 ≥ 0 (h8 : |y| = y): from h7: |x| ≤ |m−R/2| + |y| — wrong direction!!! I need |m−R/2| − y ≤ |x| ⟺ |m−R/2| ≤ |x| + y: and h7 gives |x| ≤ |m−R/2| + y. WRONG DIRECTION. The correct inequality: |m−R/2| = |(s.re/2+↑m) − (s.re/2+R/2)| ≥ |s.re/2+↑m| − |s.re/2+R/2| — I have exactly that as h7 — |x|−|y| ≤ |m−R/2| ⟹ |m−R/2| ≥ |x|−|y| ⟹ |m−R/2| + |y| ≥ |x|... no wait: goal: |m−R/2| − y ≤ |x| ⟺ |m−R/2| ≤ |x| + y ⟺ ... from h7 : |x| − y ≤ |m−R/2| (h8): |x| − y ≤ |m−R/2| ⟹ |m−R/2| ≥ |x| − y ⟹ |m−R/2| + y ≥ |x| — STILL wrong direction!! I mixed myself up. What I actually need: |x + m| = |(m−R/2) + (x+R/2)| ≥ |m−R/2| − (x+R/2) — the REVERSE triangle on the SUM: |A + B| ≥ |A| − |B| with A := m−R/2, B := x+R/2: |A+B| ≥ |A|−|B| ✓. |A|−|B| ≤ |A+B| is `abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub A (−B)`? |A − (−B)| = |A+B| and |A|−|−B| = |A|−|B|: abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub A (−B) : |A| − |−B| ≤ |A − (−B)| = |A+B| ✓. So:\n```\nhave h7 := abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub ((m : ℝ) - R / 2) (-(s.re / 2 + R / 2))\nrw [abs_neg, sub_neg_eq_add] at h7\n-- h7 : |(m : ℝ) - R / 2| - |s.re / 2 + R / 2| ≤ |(m : ℝ) - R / 2 + (s.re / 2 + R / 2)|\n-- and (m−R/2) + (s.re/2+R/2) = s.re/2 + m (ring)\nhave h5 : (m : ℝ) - R / 2 + (s.re / 2 + R / 2) = s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ) := by ring\nrw [h5] at h7\n-- h7 : |m − R/2| − |s.re/2+R/2| ≤ |s.re/2 + m|\n-- with h8 : |s.re/2+R/2| = s.re/2+R/2: h4 follows by linarith [h7, h8]\n```\n✓ that's the right direction. My earlier h5/h7 had it backwards (I applied abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub to (x+m) and (x+R/2) getting |x+m|−|x+R/2| ≤ |m−R/2| — which is TRUE but the wrong direction for h4). \n\nHmm wait — but actually h4's goal was written as `|(m:ℝ) − R/2| − (s.re/2+R/2) ≤ |s.re/2+(m:ℝ)|` — and the current (broken) attempt had h7 : |x|−|y| ≤ |m−R/2| — from which the goal does NOT follow. The a✝ shows the negation of h4's goal ✓ consistent. Fix per above.\n\n2. The simp warnings for hre/him2 (Complex.div_re/div_im unused) — the simp closed them via other lemmas (probably div_ofNat or ofNat lemmas fired automatically). Clean: change `simp [Complex.div_re]` → `simp`, same for div_im.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"`h7` had the reverse-triangle in the wrong direction. Fixing with `abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub A (−B)`, and the simp-arg warnings."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_194","name":"Edit","input":{"replace_all":false,"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiCircleBound.lean","old_string":" have h4 : |(m : ℝ) - R / 2| - (s.re / 2 + R / 2) ≤ |s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ)| := by\n have h5 : |(s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ)) - (s.re / 2 + R / 2)| = |(m : ℝ) - R / 2| := by\n have h6 : (s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ)) - (s.re / 2 + R / 2) = (m : ℝ) - R / 2 := by ring\n rw [h6]\n have h7 := abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub (s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ)) (s.re / 2 + R / 2)\n rw [h5] at h7\n have h8 : |s.re / 2 + R / 2| = s.re / 2 + R / 2 := abs_of_nonneg hge\n linarith [h7, h8]","new_string":" have h4 : |(m : ℝ) - R / 2| - (s.re / 2 + R / 2) ≤ |s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ)| := by\n have h7 := abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub ((m : ℝ) - R / 2) (-(s.re / 2 + R / 2))\n rw [abs_neg, sub_neg_eq_add] at h7\n have h5 : (m : ℝ) - R / 2 + (s.re / 2 + R / 2) = s.re / 2 + (m : ℝ) := by ring\n rw [h5] at h7\n have h8 : |s.re / 2 + R / 2| = s.re / 2 + R / 2 := abs_of_nonneg hge\n linarith [h7, h8]"},"extra_content":null}]