[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"The user wants an explicit dependency audit on the capstone theorem `logDeriv_riemannZeta_sub_nearZeros_le_tight`:\n1. Run `#print axioms logDeriv_riemannZeta_sub_nearZeros_le_tight`\n2. Record the exact perimeter parameters.\n\nPer STATE.md handoff notes:\n- LEAN: elan 4.2.3 at ~/.elan/bin (export PATH per shell); toolchain v4.33.0-rc2; NguyenRH1 at research/lean/NguyenRH1 with path requires.\n- Iterate single-file with `lake env lean NguyenRH1/LiTightR.lean` from the package dir; `lake build NguyenRH1.LiTightR` to produce the olean for cross-file imports.\n- LONG RUNS: DETACHED + sandbox DISABLED + log file; poll. For lake: SINGLE command per detached spawn; short PrintAxioms in foreground.\n\nSo a short PrintAxioms script can run in foreground. LiTightR.lean is NOT yet root-imported (per STATE.md), so the print-axioms script needs to import NguyenRH1.LiTightR directly. Since the olean exists (build is green at 8762 jobs — but was LiTightR built as part of that? STATE.md says \"full build GREEN (8762 jobs)\" and \"LiTightR.lean (~4300 lines, NOT yet root-imported — import it from the root at ii′-3b or ii′-6)\". The audits session036/036b were run, so presumably the olean for LiTightR exists via `lake build NguyenRH1.LiTightR` or via `lake env lean`.\n\nLet me first look at how previous audit scripts were set up. There are files like audit-session036-axioms.txt mentioned. Let me check the lean directory structure to find the pattern used for audits.\n\nPlan:\n1. Look at the NguyenRH1 package directory to find existing audit scripts (e.g., PrintAxioms.lean or similar).\n2. Create a small audit file (or use existing pattern) with `#print axioms logDeriv_riemannZeta_sub_nearZeros_le_tight` and also print the statement/type to record the exact perimeter parameters.\n3. Run it with `lake env lean` in foreground.\n4. Record the output to a file (e.g., research/lean audits folder) and report to the user.\n\nAlso \"record ... the exact perimeter parameters\" — the perimeter hypotheses are:\n- (hZC : ZeroCountProp)\n- (hZC2 : ZeroCountProp2)\n- (hNLZ : NoLowZeros)\n\nI should print the exact definitions of these too — ZeroCountProp, ZeroCountProp2, NoLowZeros — so the audit records their exact statements. Perhaps use `#print` on those definitions or `#check` the theorem to show its full signature.\n\nLet me explore the Lean package first.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"I'll audit the capstone. First, let me check the existing audit script pattern in the Lean package."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Bash_2","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"ls D:/Python/Quantum/research/lean/NguyenRH1/ && ls D:/Python/Quantum/research/lean/NguyenRH1/NguyenRH1/ 2>/dev/null | head -30","description":"List Lean package structure"},"extra_content":null},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Grep_3","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"logDeriv_riemannZeta_sub_nearZeros_le_tight","path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1","output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"extra_content":null}]