← Session 33 — ii′-3b/3c crux + F-D finding; Lagarias letter package
thinking (289 chars)
`continuousOn_marginExpanded` (line ~1926) has a hardcoded `ContinuousOn.const_mul ... (-2)` for the F-block — the constant (−2) is baked into the proof term. With mFblock := (−4)·F, the proof's `(-2)` argument mismatches. Fix: change the `(-2)` to `(-4)` in that proof. Let me look at it.
`continuousOn_marginExpanded` has a hardcoded `(-2)` for the F-block. Locating and fixing.
tool: Read ok
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiSkeleton.lean",
"offset": 1900,
"limit": 40
}
result 2026-08-25 05:06:41Z → 2026-08-25 05:06:41Z
{
"type": "text",
"file": {
"filePath": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiSkeleton.lean",
"content": "included \u2014 the C\u00b2 regularity on (20, \u221e) does not give the endpoint). -/\ntheorem continuousOn_marginExpanded (F : \u211d \u2192 \u211d) (hF : ContDiffOn \u211d 2 F (Set.Ioi 1)) :\n ContinuousOn (marginExpanded F) (Set.Ici 20) := by\n have hsqrt : ContinuousOn Real.sqrt (Set.Ici 20) := Real.continuous_sqrt.continuousOn\n have hT : ContinuousOn (fun m => Real.sqrt m + 1) (Set.Ici 20) :=\n hsqrt.add continuousOn_const\n have hmaps : Set.MapsTo (fun m => Real.sqrt m + 1) (Set.Ici 20) (Set.Ioi (-1)) := by\n intro x hx\n have h : 20 \u2264 x := hx\n have hnn := Real.sqrt_nonneg x\n exact Set.mem_Ioi.mpr (by linarith)\n have hlog : ContinuousOn Real.log (Set.Ici 20) :=\n Real.continuousOn_log.mono (fun x hx => by\n have h : 20 \u2264 x := hx\n exact ne_of_gt (by linarith : (0 : \u211d) < x))\n have hId : IIMaj = fun m => psiTilde (Real.sqrt m) :=\n funext fun m => IIMaj_eq_psiTilde_sqrt m\n have hIIMc : ContinuousOn IIMaj (Set.Ici 20) := by\n rw [hId]\n exact (psiTilde_contDiff.continuous.continuousOn).comp hsqrt (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)\n have hSc : ContinuousOn\n (fun m => (1/2)*m*Real.log m + (lagariasC1 - Real.eulerMascheroniConstant/2)*m - 4)\n (Set.Ici 20) :=\n (((continuousOn_const.mul continuousOn_id).mul hlog).add\n (continuousOn_const.mul continuousOn_id)).sub continuousOn_const\n unfold marginExpanded mFblock mTL1b mTL2b mIdb mL1sqb mL1L2b mL2sqb mL1b mL2b mIIM\n refine (((((((((((hSc.add\n ((hF.continuousOn.comp hT mapsTo_sqrt_shift_Ici_Ioi1).const_mul (-2))).add\n ((contDiffOn_TL1.continuousOn.comp hT hmaps).const_mul _)).add\n ((contDiffOn_TL2.continuousOn.comp hT hmaps).const_mul _)).add\n (hT.const_mul _)).add\n ((contDiffOn_L1sq.continuousOn.comp hT hmaps).const_mul _)).add\n ((contDiffOn_L1L2.continuousOn.comp hT hmaps).const_mul _)).add\n ((contDiffOn_L2sq.continuousOn.comp hT hmaps).const_mul _)).add\n ((contDiffOn_L1.continuousOn.comp hT hmaps).const_mul _)).add\n ((contDiffOn_L2.continuousOn.comp hT hmaps).const_mul _)).add\n (hIIMc.const_mul (-1)))).add\n continuousOn_const\n\n/-- [PROVED session 011] The full margin is C\u00b2 on (20, \u221e). -/",
"numLines": 40,
"startLine": 1900,
"totalLines": 2793
}
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"`continuousOn_marginExpanded` (line ~1926) has a hardcoded `ContinuousOn.const_mul ... (-2)` for the F-block — the constant (−2) is baked into the proof term. With mFblock := (−4)·F, the proof's `(-2)` argument mismatches. Fix: change the `(-2)` to `(-4)` in that proof. Let me look at it.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"`continuousOn_marginExpanded` has a hardcoded `(-2)` for the F-block. Locating and fixing."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Read_212","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiSkeleton.lean","offset":1900,"limit":40},"extra_content":null}]