[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Done. Now give the user the concise answer:\n\n1. No injection needed — everything is now in the archive.\n2. What I did: persisted the prompt as D-073 §0 (the mission), STATE.md points at it, checklist has the sub-stages, index+db registered (plus backfilled the D-071/D-072 gap from session 038).\n3. What a new session will do automatically: read STATE.md → \"RUN SIDE THREAD ii′-6-R, start at 6-R-0\" → opens D-073 §0 → full mission. \n4. Caveat: if they want, they can still paste the prompt — harmless, but no longer necessary.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"**No injection needed anymore.** I've closed the gap — the prompt is now persisted in the archive (commit `2c9ffec`):\n\n- **`research/derivations/D-073-fd-horizontal-repair.md` §0** — the full thread prompt, verbatim, as the mission section. The file also has a progress-log stub so the thread itself records sub-stage state as it goes.\n- **STATE.md NEXT ACTION** — now says explicitly: *no prompt injection needed; read D-073 §0 first; start at sub-stage 6-R-0 (E-032)*.\n- **NGUYEN.md §5** — the ii′-6-R checklist entry tracks the three sub-stages.\n- **index.md + research.db** — D-073 registered as in-progress; I also backfilled **D-071 and D-072**, which session 038's abrupt ending had left unregistered (small closure gap, now fixed).\n\nSo a fresh session will follow the standard protocol automatically: read STATE.md → see \"RUN SIDE THREAD ii′-6-R, start at 6-R-0\" → open D-073 §0 → get the complete mission with read-first list, background, deliverables, and constraints. You can start it by simply saying \"begin the ii′-6-R thread\" — or paste the prompt anyway if you want belt-and-braces; harmless, just no longer necessary."}]