← Session 35 — ii′-6-R: Lagarias 6.1 right-tail re-proof (E-032/D-073)
thinking (9500 chars)
Three errors:
1. **Line 155 (hnorm)**: `rw [norm_div, ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos, ...]` — the `← Real.sqrt_div` direction: Real.sqrt_div (hx : 0 ≤ x) : √(x / y) = √x / √y. The ← direction rewrites `√x / √y` → `√(x/y)` — but the goal has `‖a‖ / ‖b‖` (norms, not sqrts yet). My rw chain was wrong: I need to FIRST turn the norms into sqrts (via normSq_eq_norm_sq) THEN combine into one sqrt. The error shows the goal still has ‖↑3+↑t*I‖ / ‖↑2+↑t*I‖ and `← Real.sqrt_div` found no `√?x / √?y` pattern. Fix the chain:
```
rw [norm_div, ← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, ← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, hns3, hns2,
← Real.sqrt_div hQpos]
```
normSq_eq_norm_sq : normSq z = ‖z‖^2 — hmm, I want ‖z‖ = √(normSq z): ‖z‖² = normSq z ⟹ ‖z‖ = √(normSq z) (nonneg). The rewrite: `← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq` rewrites ‖z‖^2 → normSq z — but the goal has ‖z‖ not ‖z‖²... So I need: ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) = √(normSq a):
```
have hnormA : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by
rw [← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, hns3]
exact (Real.sqrt_sq (by positivity)).symm -- hmm: √(‖a‖²) = ‖a‖
```
Cleaner:
```
have hnormA : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by
rw [← hns3, Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq]
exact (Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
```
‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) via Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg) : √(‖a‖²) = ‖a‖ — symm gives ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) ✓ then Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq : ‖a‖² = normSq a... wait direction: normSq_eq_norm_sq : Complex.normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 — rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq] rewrites `normSq z` → `‖z‖^2`. I have goal ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²)... let me just:
```
have hnormA : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by
have h1 : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (Complex.normSq ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) := by
rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
rw [h1, hns3]
```
Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg a) : √(‖a‖ ^ 2) = ‖a‖ — after rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq]: the goal √(normSq a) = ... hmm let me redo: h1 : ‖a‖ = √(normSq a): rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq] — rewrites `normSq a` occurrences → ‖a‖^2: goal becomes ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖^2); then Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _) : √(‖a‖^2) = ‖a‖ — so `rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]` closes: goal ‖a‖ = √(normSq a) → ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) → ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ ✓.
Then hnorm:
```
have hnorm : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ =
Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := by
rw [norm_div, hnormA, hnormB, ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos]
```
with hnormB similarly = √(4+t²). ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos: rewrites √(9+t²)/√(4+t²) → √((9+t²)/(4+t²)) ✓.
2. **Line 157 (hs1)**: `((3:ℝ) + t*I) - 1 = (2:ℝ) + t*I` — `ring` failed: the LHS is `(↑3 + ↑t * I) - 1` and the goal shows `-1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2` — complex arithmetic: 3 + tI − 1 = (3−1) + tI = 2 + tI ✓ — ring should work over ℂ?! The goal after ring_nf suggestion... The error says "unsolved goals ⊢ -1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2" — ring normalized LHS to -1+3+tI and RHS to tI+2: -1+3 = 2 ✓ — but ring DIDN'T close it?? The message is the LEFTOVER after `ring`?? — it says ring failed, suggesting ring_nf. Weird — `ring` should handle. OH — the issue: `(3:ℝ)` is a REAL cast to ℂ, and `1` is (1:ℂ): the expression (↑3 + ↑t * I) - 1 vs (↑2 + ↑t * I)... ring over ℂ with casts — should work. But the displayed leftover: `-1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2` — this IS a ℂ identity ring should close. Unless the `by ring` for hs1 wasn't the issue and something else is... The error at 157:74 is "unsolved goals ⊢ -1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2" — hmm, maybe `ring` partially worked and left this? Try `simp` or `ext <;> simp <;> ring`. Cleaner: prove via Complex.ext: re: 3−1 = 2 ✓ im: t = t ✓:
```
have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by
rw [show ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I from by ring]
```
same thing. Try `simp [Complex.ext_iff]` then norm_num/ring: ext_iff: re = re ∧ im = im: re: (↑3 + ↑t·I − 1).re = 3−1 = 2 ✓ im: t = t ✓:
```
have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by
simp [Complex.ext_iff, sub_eq_add_neg]
ring
```
Hmm — let me just try `ring_nf` (the error's own suggestion) — or `field_simp; ring`... Actually the odd `-1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2` leftover suggests ring DID normalize but the two sides' normal forms didn't unify syntactically: LHS normal: -1 + 3 + t·I = 2 + t·I; RHS: t·I + 2. These should match... unless ring treats ↑3 and ↑2 as ATOMS (casts) and ordered them differently?! LHS = -1 + ↑3 + ↑t*I: as a sum of atoms {-1, ↑3, ↑t*I}; RHS = {↑t*I, ↑2}: ring compares: -1+↑3 = 2 vs ↑2 — the atoms ↑3 and ↑2 are DIFFERENT atoms (casts of different reals!) so ring can't cancel -1+↑3 vs ↑2 UNLESS it pushes casts: ↑3 - 1 = ↑(3-1) = ↑2 — needs push_cast first! So: `push_cast; ring` or `norm_num [Complex.ext_iff]`. Use:
```
have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by
push_cast
ring
```
push_cast normalizes ↑(3) − 1 → ↑(3−1) → ↑2 ✓ then ring ✓. (Session-035 banked: "push_cast EM conclusions before linear_combination" — same cast issue ✓.)
3. **Line 167: `Real.sqrt_pow` unknown** — wrong name. The correct name in this Mathlib: `Real.sqrt_pow` doesn't exist; alternatives: `Real.sqrt_pow` vs `Real.sq_sqrt` vs... For (√x)^n = √(x^n): `Real.sqrt_pow`?? — unknown. Search: there's `Real.sqrt_sq`, `Real.sq_sqrt`, `Real.sqrt_mul_self`, `Real.pow_sqrt_two_add`... The power identity: (√x)^n = x^(n/2)... Let me think of an alternate route: avoid sqrt_pow:
(√Q)^n ≤ e^{5/2} ⟺ ((√Q)^n)² ≤ e⁵ ⟸ (√Q)^{2n} = Qⁿ ≤ e⁵: ((√Q)^n)² = (Q^{1/2... — ((√Q)^n)² = ((√Q)²)ⁿ = Qⁿ (via ← pow_mul: (a^n)² = a^{2n}... ((√Q)^n)² = (√Q)^{n·2} = ((√Q)²)ⁿ = Qⁿ by Real.sq_sqrt hQpos : √(Q)² = Q — (√Q)² = Q ✓ Real.sq_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (√x)^2 = x ✓). So:
```
have h4 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) := by
have h5 : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 ≤ Real.exp 5 := by
rw [← pow_mul, Real.sq_sqrt hQpos]
calc ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) ^ n ≤ Real.exp 5 := hQn
_ = Real.exp 5 := rfl
-- from x² ≤ e⁵ to x ≤ e^{5/2} for x ≥ 0
have hx : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n := by positivity
have h6 : Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2) ≤
Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt h5
rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx, Real.sqrt_exp] at h6
exact h6
```
← pow_mul: (a^n)^2 = a^{n·2}; then Real.sq_sqrt hQpos : (√Q)^2 = Q — wait after ← pow_mul the term is (√Q)^{n·2} = ((√Q)^2)^n?? pow_mul : a^(m·n) = (a^m)^n — (a^n)^2 = a^(n·2) via ← pow_mul ✓ then a^(n·2) = (a²)^n via pow_mul m n : a^(m*n) = (a^m)^n — hmm: √Q^(n·2): rw [pow_mul] gives (√Q^n)^2 ← no. Let me redo: goal ((√Q)^n)^2 ≤ e⁵. `rw [← pow_mul]`: ← pow_mul rewrites a^(m*n) → (a^m)^n — I want (√Q^n)^2 → √Q^(n*2): that's pow_mul DIRECTION (a^(m*n) = (a^m)^n reversed: (a^m)^n = a^(m*n) is ← pow_mul; I want (a^n)^2 → a^(n*2): also ← pow_mul with m := n, n := 2 ✓): rw [← pow_mul] at goal: ((√Q)^n)^2 = (√Q)^(n*2) ✓. Then (√Q)^(n*2) = ((√Q)^2)^n via pow_mul (√Q) n 2 : (√Q)^(n*2) = ((√Q)^n)^2 — no that's backward again. pow_mul a m n : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n — so (√Q)^(n*2) = ((√Q)^n)^2 ✓ (back where we were) OR ((√Q)^(2*n)) = ((√Q)^2)^n ✓. So: rw [← pow_mul] → (√Q)^(n*2); rw [mul_comm n 2, pow_mul] → ((√Q)^2)^n; rw [Real.sq_sqrt hQpos] → Q^n ✓.
Simpler: use `Real.rpow`... no. Alternative clean route:
```
have h5 : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 ≤ Real.exp 5 := by
have e : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 =
(((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n := by
rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm n 2, pow_mul, Real.sq_sqrt hQpos]
rw [e]
exact hQn
```
Then the sqrt-of-squares step above (h6).
Even simpler for the final step: `Real.sqrt_le_sqrt hQn` route needs sqrt_pow to connect (√Q)^n with √(Q^n)... — hmm the actual lemma name for (√x)^n = √(x^n): `Real.sqrt_pow`?? unknown constant. Maybe `Real.sqrt_pow_of_nonneg`? or the form via `Real.sqrt_eq_rpow` + rpow... Let me just use the x²-comparison route (h5/h6) — self-contained, no sqrt_pow needed. The h6 chain:
```
have h6 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) := by
have hx0 : (0 : ℝ) ≤ Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := Real.sqrt_nonneg _
have hx : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n := pow_nonneg hx0 n
have h8 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n =
Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2) := by
rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx]
rw [h8]
calc Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2)
≤ Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt h5
_ = Real.exp (5 / 2) := by rw [Real.sqrt_exp]
```
Real.sqrt_sq (hx : 0 ≤ x) : √(x ^ 2) = x ✓ — rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx] at h8's goal: √(x²) → x ✓ so h8 : y = √(y²) where y = (√Q)^n: rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx] rewrites √(y²) → y: goal y = y ✓ — hmm rw on h8's statement `y = √(y^2)`: rewriting √(y²)→y turns RHS into y: y = y ✓ closed by rfl ✓.
That's clean. Apply the three fixes:
1. hnormA/hnormB approach for hnorm.
2. hs1 via push_cast + ring.
3. the h4 sqrt-chain via h5/h6.
Three fixes: the norm-to-sqrt chain needs `Real.sqrt_sq`, the ℂ subtraction needs `push_cast` before `ring`, and `Real.sqrt_pow` doesn't exist in this Mathlib — using a squares-comparison instead.
tool: Edit
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiDogLeg.lean",
"old_string": " have hns3 : Complex.normSq ((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) = 9 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hns2 : Complex.normSq ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) = 4 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hnorm : \u2016((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)\u2016 =\n Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := by\n rw [norm_div, \u2190 Real.sqrt_div hQpos, \u2190 Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq,\n \u2190 Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, hns3, hns2]\n have hs1 : ((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I := by ring\n unfold kFun\n rw [hs1]\n calc \u2016(((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n - 1\u2016\n \u2264 \u2016(((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n\u2016 + \u2016(1 : \u2102)\u2016 :=\n norm_sub_le _ _\n _ = (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n + 1 := by\n rw [norm_pow, hnorm, norm_one]\n _ \u2264 Real.exp (5 / 2) + 1 := by\n have h4 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n \u2264 Real.exp (5 / 2) := by\n rw [Real.sqrt_pow]\n calc Real.sqrt (((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) ^ n)\n \u2264 Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt hQn\n _ = Real.exp (5 / 2) := by rw [Real.sqrt_exp]\n linarith [h4]",
"new_string": " have hns3 : Complex.normSq ((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) = 9 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hns2 : Complex.normSq ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) = 4 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hnormA : \u2016((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)\u2016 = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by\n have h1 : \u2016((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)\u2016 =\n Real.sqrt (Complex.normSq ((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)) := by\n rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]\n rw [h1, hns3]\n have hnormB : \u2016((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)\u2016 = Real.sqrt (4 + t ^ 2) := by\n have h1 : \u2016((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)\u2016 =\n Real.sqrt (Complex.normSq ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)) := by\n rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]\n rw [h1, hns2]\n have hnorm : \u2016((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)\u2016 =\n Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := by\n rw [norm_div, hnormA, hnormB, \u2190 Real.sqrt_div hQpos]\n have hs1 : ((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I := by\n push_cast\n ring\n unfold kFun\n rw [hs1]\n calc \u2016(((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n - 1\u2016\n \u2264 \u2016(((3 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : \u211d) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n\u2016 + \u2016(1 : \u2102)\u2016 :=\n norm_sub_le _ _\n _ = (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n + 1 := by\n rw [norm_pow, hnorm, norm_one]\n _ \u2264 Real.exp (5 / 2) + 1 := by\n have h4 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n \u2264 Real.exp (5 / 2) := by\n have hx0 : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) :=\n Real.sqrt_nonneg _\n have hx : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n :=\n pow_nonneg hx0 n\n have h5 : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 \u2264 Real.exp 5 := by\n have e : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 =\n ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) ^ n := by\n rw [\u2190 pow_mul, mul_comm n 2, pow_mul, Real.sq_sqrt hQpos]\n rw [e]\n exact hQn\n have h8 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n =\n Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2) := by\n rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx]\n rw [h8]\n calc Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2)\n \u2264 Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt h5\n _ = Real.exp (5 / 2) := by rw [Real.sqrt_exp]\n linarith [h4]"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Three errors:\n\n1. **Line 155 (hnorm)**: `rw [norm_div, ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos, ...]` — the `← Real.sqrt_div` direction: Real.sqrt_div (hx : 0 ≤ x) : √(x / y) = √x / √y. The ← direction rewrites `√x / √y` → `√(x/y)` — but the goal has `‖a‖ / ‖b‖` (norms, not sqrts yet). My rw chain was wrong: I need to FIRST turn the norms into sqrts (via normSq_eq_norm_sq) THEN combine into one sqrt. The error shows the goal still has ‖↑3+↑t*I‖ / ‖↑2+↑t*I‖ and `← Real.sqrt_div` found no `√?x / √?y` pattern. Fix the chain: \n```\n rw [norm_div, ← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, ← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, hns3, hns2,\n ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos]\n```\nnormSq_eq_norm_sq : normSq z = ‖z‖^2 — hmm, I want ‖z‖ = √(normSq z): ‖z‖² = normSq z ⟹ ‖z‖ = √(normSq z) (nonneg). The rewrite: `← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq` rewrites ‖z‖^2 → normSq z — but the goal has ‖z‖ not ‖z‖²... So I need: ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) = √(normSq a): \n```\n have hnormA : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by\n rw [← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, hns3]\n exact (Real.sqrt_sq (by positivity)).symm -- hmm: √(‖a‖²) = ‖a‖\n```\nCleaner:\n```\n have hnormA : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by\n rw [← hns3, Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq]\n exact (Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm\n```\n‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) via Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg) : √(‖a‖²) = ‖a‖ — symm gives ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) ✓ then Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq : ‖a‖² = normSq a... wait direction: normSq_eq_norm_sq : Complex.normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 — rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq] rewrites `normSq z` → `‖z‖^2`. I have goal ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²)... let me just:\n```\n have hnormA : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by\n have h1 : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (Complex.normSq ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) := by\n rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]\n rw [h1, hns3]\n```\nReal.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg a) : √(‖a‖ ^ 2) = ‖a‖ — after rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq]: the goal √(normSq a) = ... hmm let me redo: h1 : ‖a‖ = √(normSq a): rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq] — rewrites `normSq a` occurrences → ‖a‖^2: goal becomes ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖^2); then Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _) : √(‖a‖^2) = ‖a‖ — so `rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]` closes: goal ‖a‖ = √(normSq a) → ‖a‖ = √(‖a‖²) → ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ ✓.\n\nThen hnorm: \n```\n have hnorm : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ =\n Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := by\n rw [norm_div, hnormA, hnormB, ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos]\n```\nwith hnormB similarly = √(4+t²). ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos: rewrites √(9+t²)/√(4+t²) → √((9+t²)/(4+t²)) ✓.\n\n2. **Line 157 (hs1)**: `((3:ℝ) + t*I) - 1 = (2:ℝ) + t*I` — `ring` failed: the LHS is `(↑3 + ↑t * I) - 1` and the goal shows `-1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2` — complex arithmetic: 3 + tI − 1 = (3−1) + tI = 2 + tI ✓ — ring should work over ℂ?! The goal after ring_nf suggestion... The error says \"unsolved goals ⊢ -1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2\" — ring normalized LHS to -1+3+tI and RHS to tI+2: -1+3 = 2 ✓ — but ring DIDN'T close it?? The message is the LEFTOVER after `ring`?? — it says ring failed, suggesting ring_nf. Weird — `ring` should handle. OH — the issue: `(3:ℝ)` is a REAL cast to ℂ, and `1` is (1:ℂ): the expression (↑3 + ↑t * I) - 1 vs (↑2 + ↑t * I)... ring over ℂ with casts — should work. But the displayed leftover: `-1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2` — this IS a ℂ identity ring should close. Unless the `by ring` for hs1 wasn't the issue and something else is... The error at 157:74 is \"unsolved goals ⊢ -1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2\" — hmm, maybe `ring` partially worked and left this? Try `simp` or `ext <;> simp <;> ring`. Cleaner: prove via Complex.ext: re: 3−1 = 2 ✓ im: t = t ✓:\n```\n have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by\n rw [show ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I from by ring]\n```\nsame thing. Try `simp [Complex.ext_iff]` then norm_num/ring: ext_iff: re = re ∧ im = im: re: (↑3 + ↑t·I − 1).re = 3−1 = 2 ✓ im: t = t ✓: \n```\n have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by\n simp [Complex.ext_iff, sub_eq_add_neg]\n ring\n```\nHmm — let me just try `ring_nf` (the error's own suggestion) — or `field_simp; ring`... Actually the odd `-1 + ↑3 + ↑t * I = ↑t * I + ↑2` leftover suggests ring DID normalize but the two sides' normal forms didn't unify syntactically: LHS normal: -1 + 3 + t·I = 2 + t·I; RHS: t·I + 2. These should match... unless ring treats ↑3 and ↑2 as ATOMS (casts) and ordered them differently?! LHS = -1 + ↑3 + ↑t*I: as a sum of atoms {-1, ↑3, ↑t*I}; RHS = {↑t*I, ↑2}: ring compares: -1+↑3 = 2 vs ↑2 — the atoms ↑3 and ↑2 are DIFFERENT atoms (casts of different reals!) so ring can't cancel -1+↑3 vs ↑2 UNLESS it pushes casts: ↑3 - 1 = ↑(3-1) = ↑2 — needs push_cast first! So: `push_cast; ring` or `norm_num [Complex.ext_iff]`. Use:\n```\n have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by\n push_cast\n ring\n```\npush_cast normalizes ↑(3) − 1 → ↑(3−1) → ↑2 ✓ then ring ✓. (Session-035 banked: \"push_cast EM conclusions before linear_combination\" — same cast issue ✓.)\n\n3. **Line 167: `Real.sqrt_pow` unknown** — wrong name. The correct name in this Mathlib: `Real.sqrt_pow` doesn't exist; alternatives: `Real.sqrt_pow` vs `Real.sq_sqrt` vs... For (√x)^n = √(x^n): `Real.sqrt_pow`?? — unknown. Search: there's `Real.sqrt_sq`, `Real.sq_sqrt`, `Real.sqrt_mul_self`, `Real.pow_sqrt_two_add`... The power identity: (√x)^n = x^(n/2)... Let me think of an alternate route: avoid sqrt_pow: \n(√Q)^n ≤ e^{5/2} ⟺ ((√Q)^n)² ≤ e⁵ ⟸ (√Q)^{2n} = Qⁿ ≤ e⁵: ((√Q)^n)² = (Q^{1/2... — ((√Q)^n)² = ((√Q)²)ⁿ = Qⁿ (via ← pow_mul: (a^n)² = a^{2n}... ((√Q)^n)² = (√Q)^{n·2} = ((√Q)²)ⁿ = Qⁿ by Real.sq_sqrt hQpos : √(Q)² = Q — (√Q)² = Q ✓ Real.sq_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (√x)^2 = x ✓). So:\n```\n have h4 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) := by\n have h5 : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 ≤ Real.exp 5 := by\n rw [← pow_mul, Real.sq_sqrt hQpos]\n calc ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) ^ n ≤ Real.exp 5 := hQn\n _ = Real.exp 5 := rfl\n -- from x² ≤ e⁵ to x ≤ e^{5/2} for x ≥ 0\n have hx : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n := by positivity\n have h6 : Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2) ≤\n Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt h5\n rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx, Real.sqrt_exp] at h6\n exact h6\n```\n← pow_mul: (a^n)^2 = a^{n·2}; then Real.sq_sqrt hQpos : (√Q)^2 = Q — wait after ← pow_mul the term is (√Q)^{n·2} = ((√Q)^2)^n?? pow_mul : a^(m·n) = (a^m)^n — (a^n)^2 = a^(n·2) via ← pow_mul ✓ then a^(n·2) = (a²)^n via pow_mul m n : a^(m*n) = (a^m)^n — hmm: √Q^(n·2): rw [pow_mul] gives (√Q^n)^2 ← no. Let me redo: goal ((√Q)^n)^2 ≤ e⁵. `rw [← pow_mul]`: ← pow_mul rewrites a^(m*n) → (a^m)^n — I want (√Q^n)^2 → √Q^(n*2): that's pow_mul DIRECTION (a^(m*n) = (a^m)^n reversed: (a^m)^n = a^(m*n) is ← pow_mul; I want (a^n)^2 → a^(n*2): also ← pow_mul with m := n, n := 2 ✓): rw [← pow_mul] at goal: ((√Q)^n)^2 = (√Q)^(n*2) ✓. Then (√Q)^(n*2) = ((√Q)^2)^n via pow_mul (√Q) n 2 : (√Q)^(n*2) = ((√Q)^n)^2 — no that's backward again. pow_mul a m n : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n — so (√Q)^(n*2) = ((√Q)^n)^2 ✓ (back where we were) OR ((√Q)^(2*n)) = ((√Q)^2)^n ✓. So: rw [← pow_mul] → (√Q)^(n*2); rw [mul_comm n 2, pow_mul] → ((√Q)^2)^n; rw [Real.sq_sqrt hQpos] → Q^n ✓. \n\nSimpler: use `Real.rpow`... no. Alternative clean route: \n```\n have h5 : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 ≤ Real.exp 5 := by\n have e : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 =\n (((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n := by\n rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm n 2, pow_mul, Real.sq_sqrt hQpos]\n rw [e]\n exact hQn\n```\nThen the sqrt-of-squares step above (h6).\n\nEven simpler for the final step: `Real.sqrt_le_sqrt hQn` route needs sqrt_pow to connect (√Q)^n with √(Q^n)... — hmm the actual lemma name for (√x)^n = √(x^n): `Real.sqrt_pow`?? unknown constant. Maybe `Real.sqrt_pow_of_nonneg`? or the form via `Real.sqrt_eq_rpow` + rpow... Let me just use the x²-comparison route (h5/h6) — self-contained, no sqrt_pow needed. The h6 chain:\n```\n have h6 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) := by\n have hx0 : (0 : ℝ) ≤ Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := Real.sqrt_nonneg _\n have hx : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n := pow_nonneg hx0 n\n have h8 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n =\n Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2) := by\n rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx]\n rw [h8]\n calc Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2)\n ≤ Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt h5\n _ = Real.exp (5 / 2) := by rw [Real.sqrt_exp]\n```\nReal.sqrt_sq (hx : 0 ≤ x) : √(x ^ 2) = x ✓ — rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx] at h8's goal: √(x²) → x ✓ so h8 : y = √(y²) where y = (√Q)^n: rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx] rewrites √(y²) → y: goal y = y ✓ — hmm rw on h8's statement `y = √(y^2)`: rewriting √(y²)→y turns RHS into y: y = y ✓ closed by rfl ✓.\n\nThat's clean. Apply the three fixes:\n1. hnormA/hnormB approach for hnorm.\n2. hs1 via push_cast + ring.\n3. the h4 sqrt-chain via h5/h6.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"Three fixes: the norm-to-sqrt chain needs `Real.sqrt_sq`, the ℂ subtraction needs `push_cast` before `ring`, and `Real.sqrt_pow` doesn't exist in this Mathlib — using a squares-comparison instead."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_206","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiDogLeg.lean","old_string":" have hns3 : Complex.normSq ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) = 9 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hns2 : Complex.normSq ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) = 4 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hnorm : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ =\n Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := by\n rw [norm_div, ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos, ← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq,\n ← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, hns3, hns2]\n have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by ring\n unfold kFun\n rw [hs1]\n calc ‖(((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n - 1‖\n ≤ ‖(((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n‖ + ‖(1 : ℂ)‖ :=\n norm_sub_le _ _\n _ = (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n + 1 := by\n rw [norm_pow, hnorm, norm_one]\n _ ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) + 1 := by\n have h4 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) := by\n rw [Real.sqrt_pow]\n calc Real.sqrt (((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) ^ n)\n ≤ Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt hQn\n _ = Real.exp (5 / 2) := by rw [Real.sqrt_exp]\n linarith [h4]","new_string":" have hns3 : Complex.normSq ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) = 9 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hns2 : Complex.normSq ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) = 4 + t ^ 2 := by\n simp [Complex.normSq_apply]\n ring\n have hnormA : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (9 + t ^ 2) := by\n have h1 : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ =\n Real.sqrt (Complex.normSq ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) := by\n rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]\n rw [h1, hns3]\n have hnormB : ‖((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ = Real.sqrt (4 + t ^ 2) := by\n have h1 : ‖((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ =\n Real.sqrt (Complex.normSq ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) := by\n rw [Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]\n rw [h1, hns2]\n have hnorm : ‖((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)‖ =\n Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) := by\n rw [norm_div, hnormA, hnormB, ← Real.sqrt_div hQpos]\n have hs1 : ((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) - 1 = (2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I := by\n push_cast\n ring\n unfold kFun\n rw [hs1]\n calc ‖(((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n - 1‖\n ≤ ‖(((3 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I) / ((2 : ℝ) + t * Complex.I)) ^ n‖ + ‖(1 : ℂ)‖ :=\n norm_sub_le _ _\n _ = (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n + 1 := by\n rw [norm_pow, hnorm, norm_one]\n _ ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) + 1 := by\n have h4 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n ≤ Real.exp (5 / 2) := by\n have hx0 : (0 : ℝ) ≤ Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) :=\n Real.sqrt_nonneg _\n have hx : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n :=\n pow_nonneg hx0 n\n have h5 : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 ≤ Real.exp 5 := by\n have e : ((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2 =\n ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2)) ^ n := by\n rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm n 2, pow_mul, Real.sq_sqrt hQpos]\n rw [e]\n exact hQn\n have h8 : (Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n =\n Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2) := by\n rw [Real.sqrt_sq hx]\n rw [h8]\n calc Real.sqrt (((Real.sqrt ((9 + t ^ 2) / (4 + t ^ 2))) ^ n) ^ 2)\n ≤ Real.sqrt (Real.exp 5) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt h5\n _ = Real.exp (5 / 2) := by rw [Real.sqrt_exp]\n linarith [h4]"},"extra_content":null}]