← Session 35 — ii′-6-R: Lagarias 6.1 right-tail re-proof (E-032/D-073)
thinking (8668 chars)
Now I can see the real issue: **exponent type mismatch**. The goal's power is `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` (REAL exponent — because norm_term_eq has `n ^ s.re` with s.re : ℝ, so it's an rpow or a pow with real exponent!), while my `e` used `(n : ℝ) ^ 3` (natural-number exponent 3). The calc error shows it explicitly: goal has `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` vs mine `↑n ^ (3 : ℕ)`. Wait — `(3 : ℝ)` as a pow exponent — `n ^ (3:ℝ)` — that's `Real.rpow`?? or Monoid.pow with a real exponent (which doesn't typecheck)... — actually `n ^ s.re` in norm_term_eq: the ^ there is `Real.rpow`?? Hmm — norm_term_eq: `‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` with n : ℕ... the `n ^ s.re` — with s.re : ℝ, the exponent is real: this is `Real.rpow`?? But the display shows `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` — hmm, in Mathlib, `n ^ s.re` with n : ℕ base and s.re real exponent: the exponent coercion: this is Monoid.pow? No — it's `Real.rpow` written with the ^ notation? Mathlib uses `HPow ℝ ℝ ℝ` via rpow — the display `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` would be rpow. Hmm — but wait, norm_term_eq's actual statement: `‖term f s n‖ = if n = 0 then 0 else ‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — the `n` in `n ^ s.re`: base (n : ℝ)? exponent s.re : ℝ → rpow?? But then the displayed `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` — hmm but the error message's calc comparison says the goal has `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ) : ℝ` — it might be `Monoid.pow` with the exponent being... no, Monoid.pow exponent is ℕ.
Look at the error more carefully: "left-hand side is `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / ↑n ^ (3 : ℕ) : ℝ` but is expected to be `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / ↑n ^ (3 : ℝ) : ℝ`" — so the goal's power has exponent `(3 : ℝ)` — REAL. But `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` with ↑n : ℝ base and (3:ℝ) exponent — that's `Real.rpow`?? but displayed with ^... OR it's `HPow ℝ ℝ ℝ` = rpow. Hmm — but wait, actually re-reading norm_term_eq: `‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — hmm, with s.re being the real part — but actually looking at the norm_term_eq source from earlier: `‖term f s n‖ = if n = 0 then 0 else ‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — hmm wait, earlier I saw the term def: `LSeries.term f s n = f n * (n : ℂ) ^ (-s)` (cpow with complex exponent) and norm_term_eq gives `‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — where `n ^ s.re` has base (n:ℝ) and exponent s.re — is that rpow or... `Real.rpow` is usually displayed as `x ^ y` with both real ✓. So the goal's powers are RPOW: `↑n ^ (3:ℝ)` is `Real.rpow ↑n 3`.
So my `e` must use the rpow forms: `↑n ^ (3:ℝ)` and `↑n ^ (2:ℝ)`. Fix: state e with real exponents:
```
have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ) =
(1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := by
rw [show ((3 : ℝ)) = ((3 : ℕ) : ℝ) by norm_num, ← Real.rpow_natCast _ 3, ...]
```
hmm — or simpler: convert rpow to pow via Real.rpow_natCast : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n (Real.rpow_natCast x n : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n ✓ — wait the name: `Real.rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n` ✓ exists).
Cleanest: first convert the GOAL's rpow to npow: rw [← Real.rpow_natCast, ...] — hmm but the goal came from norm_term_eq with s.re — (3:ℂ).re = 3 : ℝ — after my h3re rewrite, the exponent is literally (3:ℝ)... ugh wait — h3re : ((3:ℂ).re) = 3 — I simp only [norm_term_eq, h3re, h2re] — the exponent became `3` — as a REAL (s.re : ℝ) — so the goal has x ^ ((3 : ℝ)) = rpow x 3.
FIX at the source: after the simp/split, convert rpow to npow: `rw [← Real.rpow_natCast, ← Real.rpow_natCast]`... — Real.rpow_natCast (x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n:ℝ) = x ^ n — ← direction rewrites x ^ n → x ^ (n:ℝ)?? No: rw [Real.rpow_natCast] rewrites rpow → npow (LHS→RHS of the lemma: x ^ (↑n) → x ^ n). So rw [Real.rpow_natCast] — with metavariables (x := ?, n := ?) — first unifier — might hit the wrong spot; use explicit: `rw [Real.rpow_natCast (n : ℝ) 3, Real.rpow_natCast (n : ℝ) 2]`?? signature: Real.rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n — so `rw [Real.rpow_natCast (n : ℝ) 3]` rewrites (↑n)^((3:ℕ):ℝ) → (↑n)^3 — but the goal's exponent is (3 : ℝ) the NUMERAL 3, not ((3:ℕ):ℝ) the cast — is (3:ℝ) defeq to ((3:ℕ):ℝ)? Yes, by norm_num/rfl? `((3:ℕ):ℝ) = (3:ℝ)` by Nat.cast_ofNat ✓. So I need the exponent in cast form first, or use `show` to restate the goal with npow:
```
rw [show (3 : ℝ) = ((3 : ℕ) : ℝ) by norm_num, Real.rpow_natCast,
show (2 : ℝ) = ((2 : ℕ) : ℝ) by norm_num, Real.rpow_natCast]
```
Hmm wait — that rewrites in the GOAL: (3:ℝ) → ((3:ℕ):ℝ) via the show equation... rw [show (3:ℝ) = ((3:ℕ):ℝ) by norm_num] — rewrites occurrences of (3:ℝ) to ((3:ℕ):ℝ) — DANGER: it might rewrite other (3:ℝ) occurrences (the session-033 gotcha: "rw [X = 1*X] rewrites everywhere"). In the goal `Λ/↑n^(3:ℝ) ≤ (1/2)·(Λ/↑n^(2:ℝ))` the only real literals are the exponents and the 1/2 — (3:ℝ) appears once ✓ (2:ℝ) appears... in exponents once and in 1/2? no, 1/2 is 1/(2:ℝ) — (2:ℝ) appears in the denominator too!! rw would hit both. Ugh.
Much cleaner: state everything with NPOW from the start by rewriting the GOAL to npow form before split:
```
simp only [LSeries.norm_term_eq, h3re, h2re, Real.rpow_natCast]
```
no wait — norm_term_eq's output has rpow; adding `Real.rpow_natCast` to the simp only list rewrites x^(↑(3:ℕ)) → x^3 — but the exponent after h3re is the numeral (3:ℝ), not a cast of a nat — simp's Real.rpow_natCast needs the exponent to be ↑(n:ℕ) syntactically?? simp can use it if it unifies (3:ℝ) with ↑?n — simp's matching might handle numerals (they're OfNat.ofNat 3 vs Nat.cast 3 — `Nat.cast_ofNat` is the bridge simp lemma: add it: simp only [LSeries.norm_term_eq, h3re, h2re, Nat.cast_ofNat, Real.rpow_natCast]. Hmm — but (3:ℝ) as OfNat.ofNat 3 → Nat.cast_ofNat : Nat.cast 3 = 3?? Nat.cast_ofNat is `(↑n : ℝ) = n`?? Let me not overthink — simplest robust: skip the conversion entirely and prove `e` in the RPOW world directly:
```
have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ) =
(1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := by
rw [show (3 : ℝ) = 2 + 1 by norm_num, Real.rpow_add (by positivity : (0:ℝ) < (n:ℝ)),
Real.rpow_one]
field_simp [show (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 by positivity]
ring
```
x^3 = x^(2+1) = x^2·x^1 = x²·x: Λ/(x²·x) = (1/x)·(Λ/x²) ✓. Then the calc:
```
calc ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ)
= (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := e
_ ≤ (1 / 2) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h12 hpos
```
with hpos's power also ^ (2:ℝ): div_nonneg Λnn (by positivity : 0 ≤ ↑n^(2:ℝ))... positivity handles rpow of positive base ✓ probably (positivity knows Real.rpow_pos_of_pos? it has extensions for rpow ✓).
h12's goal after the rw fix: `1 / ↑n ≤ 1 / 2` — the error at 223 was div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left's rw failing: pattern `1 / 2 ≤ 1 / ↑n` not found in `1 / ↑n ≤ 1 / 2` — the div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left gives `a/c ≤ a/b ↔ b ≤ c` (from the earlier analysis: div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a/b ≤ a/c ↔ c ≤ b) — the goal `1/↑n ≤ 1/2`: a/b ≤ a/c with a=1, b=↑n, c=2: rw [div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left ...] turns it into `c ≤ b` = `2 ≤ ↑n` — the error says pattern `1 / 2 ≤ 1 / ↑n` not found in `1 / ↑n ≤ 1 / 2` — so this Mathlib's div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left is stated the OTHER way: `a/c ≤ a/b ↔ b ≤ c`!! (the banked session-033 gotcha: "one_div_le_one_div_of_le takes the small side's positivity first" and "div_lt_iff₀ is a/c<b here (lt_div_iff₀ for a<b/c)" — direction variations.) The error's pattern shows `1 / 2 ≤ 1 / ↑n` — meaning rw tried to unify the lemma's LHS `?a/?c ≤ ?a/?b`... the lemma must be: div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ c. So rw gives `2 ≤ ↑n`?? but the pattern search shows it wanted `1/2 ≤ 1/↑n` — YES: the lemma's LHS is `a / c ≤ a / b` with c=2, b=↑n: `1/2 ≤ 1/↑n` — that's what it searched for and didn't find because the goal is `1/↑n ≤ 1/2` (the other direction). So this Mathlib's div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left : a/c ≤ a/b ↔ b ≤ c — for the goal 1/↑n ≤ 1/2 I need the OTHER form: `one_div_le_one_div_of_le (hb : 0 < b) (h : b ≤ c) : 1 / c ≤ 1 / b`?? — banked session-033: "one_div_le_one_div_of_le takes the small side's positivity first" — `one_div_le_one_div_of_le : 0 < a → a ≤ b → 1 / b ≤ 1 / a` ✓. So: `exact one_div_le_one_div_of_le (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 2) (by exact_mod_cast hn2 : (2:ℝ) ≤ (n:ℝ))` — gives 1/↑n ≤ 1/2 ✓✓. Cleanest:
```
have h12 : (1 : ℝ) / (n : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 :=
one_div_le_one_div_of_le (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 2)
(by exact_mod_cast hn2 : (2 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ))
```
Apply all three fixes: e with rpow (via rpow_add/rpow_one), h12 via one_div_le_one_div_of_le, hpos with rpow-positivity.
The powers are `rpow` (real exponents from `s.re`), not `pow` — fixing `e` to the rpow world, plus the `one_div` comparison direction.
tool: Edit
input
{
"file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiDogLeg.lean",
"old_string": " have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ 3 =\n (1 / (n : \u211d)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ 2) := by\n field_simp [show (n : \u211d) \u2260 0 by positivity]\n have h12 : (1 : \u211d) / (n : \u211d) \u2264 1 / 2 := by\n rw [div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (by norm_num : (0 : \u211d) < 1)\n (by norm_num : (0 : \u211d) < 2) (by positivity : (0 : \u211d) < (n : \u211d))]\n exact_mod_cast hn2\n have hpos : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ 2 :=\n div_nonneg ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_nonneg\n (pow_nonneg (by positivity : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (n : \u211d)) 2)\n calc ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ 3\n = (1 / (n : \u211d)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ 2) := e\n _ \u2264 (1 / 2) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ 2) :=\n mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h12 hpos",
"new_string": " have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ (3 : \u211d) =\n (1 / (n : \u211d)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ (2 : \u211d)) := by\n rw [show (3 : \u211d) = 2 + 1 by norm_num,\n Real.rpow_add (by positivity : (0 : \u211d) < (n : \u211d)), Real.rpow_one]\n field_simp [show (n : \u211d) \u2260 0 by positivity]\n ring\n have h12 : (1 : \u211d) / (n : \u211d) \u2264 1 / 2 :=\n one_div_le_one_div_of_le (by norm_num : (0 : \u211d) < 2)\n (by exact_mod_cast hn2 : (2 : \u211d) \u2264 (n : \u211d))\n have hpos : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ (2 : \u211d) :=\n div_nonneg ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_nonneg\n (Real.rpow_nonneg (by positivity : (0 : \u211d) \u2264 (n : \u211d)) _)\n calc ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ (3 : \u211d)\n = (1 / (n : \u211d)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ (2 : \u211d)) := e\n _ \u2264 (1 / 2) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : \u211d) ^ (2 : \u211d)) :=\n mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h12 hpos"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Now I can see the real issue: **exponent type mismatch**. The goal's power is `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` (REAL exponent — because norm_term_eq has `n ^ s.re` with s.re : ℝ, so it's an rpow or a pow with real exponent!), while my `e` used `(n : ℝ) ^ 3` (natural-number exponent 3). The calc error shows it explicitly: goal has `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` vs mine `↑n ^ (3 : ℕ)`. Wait — `(3 : ℝ)` as a pow exponent — `n ^ (3:ℝ)` — that's `Real.rpow`?? or Monoid.pow with a real exponent (which doesn't typecheck)... — actually `n ^ s.re` in norm_term_eq: the ^ there is `Real.rpow`?? Hmm — norm_term_eq: `‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` with n : ℕ... the `n ^ s.re` — with s.re : ℝ, the exponent is real: this is `Real.rpow`?? But the display shows `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` — hmm, in Mathlib, `n ^ s.re` with n : ℕ base and s.re real exponent: the exponent coercion: this is Monoid.pow? No — it's `Real.rpow` written with the ^ notation? Mathlib uses `HPow ℝ ℝ ℝ` via rpow — the display `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` would be rpow. Hmm — but wait, norm_term_eq's actual statement: `‖term f s n‖ = if n = 0 then 0 else ‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — the `n` in `n ^ s.re`: base (n : ℝ)? exponent s.re : ℝ → rpow?? But then the displayed `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` — hmm but the error message's calc comparison says the goal has `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ) : ℝ` — it might be `Monoid.pow` with the exponent being... no, Monoid.pow exponent is ℕ.\n\nLook at the error more carefully: \"left-hand side is `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / ↑n ^ (3 : ℕ) : ℝ` but is expected to be `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / ↑n ^ (3 : ℝ) : ℝ`\" — so the goal's power has exponent `(3 : ℝ)` — REAL. But `↑n ^ (3 : ℝ)` with ↑n : ℝ base and (3:ℝ) exponent — that's `Real.rpow`?? but displayed with ^... OR it's `HPow ℝ ℝ ℝ` = rpow. Hmm — but wait, actually re-reading norm_term_eq: `‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — hmm, with s.re being the real part — but actually looking at the norm_term_eq source from earlier: `‖term f s n‖ = if n = 0 then 0 else ‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — hmm wait, earlier I saw the term def: `LSeries.term f s n = f n * (n : ℂ) ^ (-s)` (cpow with complex exponent) and norm_term_eq gives `‖f n‖ / n ^ s.re` — where `n ^ s.re` has base (n:ℝ) and exponent s.re — is that rpow or... `Real.rpow` is usually displayed as `x ^ y` with both real ✓. So the goal's powers are RPOW: `↑n ^ (3:ℝ)` is `Real.rpow ↑n 3`.\n\nSo my `e` must use the rpow forms: `↑n ^ (3:ℝ)` and `↑n ^ (2:ℝ)`. Fix: state e with real exponents:\n```\n have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ) =\n (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := by\n rw [show ((3 : ℝ)) = ((3 : ℕ) : ℝ) by norm_num, ← Real.rpow_natCast _ 3, ...]\n```\nhmm — or simpler: convert rpow to pow via Real.rpow_natCast : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n (Real.rpow_natCast x n : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n ✓ — wait the name: `Real.rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n` ✓ exists).\n\nCleanest: first convert the GOAL's rpow to npow: rw [← Real.rpow_natCast, ...] — hmm but the goal came from norm_term_eq with s.re — (3:ℂ).re = 3 : ℝ — after my h3re rewrite, the exponent is literally (3:ℝ)... ugh wait — h3re : ((3:ℂ).re) = 3 — I simp only [norm_term_eq, h3re, h2re] — the exponent became `3` — as a REAL (s.re : ℝ) — so the goal has x ^ ((3 : ℝ)) = rpow x 3.\n\nFIX at the source: after the simp/split, convert rpow to npow: `rw [← Real.rpow_natCast, ← Real.rpow_natCast]`... — Real.rpow_natCast (x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n:ℝ) = x ^ n — ← direction rewrites x ^ n → x ^ (n:ℝ)?? No: rw [Real.rpow_natCast] rewrites rpow → npow (LHS→RHS of the lemma: x ^ (↑n) → x ^ n). So rw [Real.rpow_natCast] — with metavariables (x := ?, n := ?) — first unifier — might hit the wrong spot; use explicit: `rw [Real.rpow_natCast (n : ℝ) 3, Real.rpow_natCast (n : ℝ) 2]`?? signature: Real.rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n — so `rw [Real.rpow_natCast (n : ℝ) 3]` rewrites (↑n)^((3:ℕ):ℝ) → (↑n)^3 — but the goal's exponent is (3 : ℝ) the NUMERAL 3, not ((3:ℕ):ℝ) the cast — is (3:ℝ) defeq to ((3:ℕ):ℝ)? Yes, by norm_num/rfl? `((3:ℕ):ℝ) = (3:ℝ)` by Nat.cast_ofNat ✓. So I need the exponent in cast form first, or use `show` to restate the goal with npow:\n```\n rw [show (3 : ℝ) = ((3 : ℕ) : ℝ) by norm_num, Real.rpow_natCast,\n show (2 : ℝ) = ((2 : ℕ) : ℝ) by norm_num, Real.rpow_natCast]\n```\nHmm wait — that rewrites in the GOAL: (3:ℝ) → ((3:ℕ):ℝ) via the show equation... rw [show (3:ℝ) = ((3:ℕ):ℝ) by norm_num] — rewrites occurrences of (3:ℝ) to ((3:ℕ):ℝ) — DANGER: it might rewrite other (3:ℝ) occurrences (the session-033 gotcha: \"rw [X = 1*X] rewrites everywhere\"). In the goal `Λ/↑n^(3:ℝ) ≤ (1/2)·(Λ/↑n^(2:ℝ))` the only real literals are the exponents and the 1/2 — (3:ℝ) appears once ✓ (2:ℝ) appears... in exponents once and in 1/2? no, 1/2 is 1/(2:ℝ) — (2:ℝ) appears in the denominator too!! rw would hit both. Ugh.\n\nMuch cleaner: state everything with NPOW from the start by rewriting the GOAL to npow form before split:\n```\n simp only [LSeries.norm_term_eq, h3re, h2re, Real.rpow_natCast]\n```\nno wait — norm_term_eq's output has rpow; adding `Real.rpow_natCast` to the simp only list rewrites x^(↑(3:ℕ)) → x^3 — but the exponent after h3re is the numeral (3:ℝ), not a cast of a nat — simp's Real.rpow_natCast needs the exponent to be ↑(n:ℕ) syntactically?? simp can use it if it unifies (3:ℝ) with ↑?n — simp's matching might handle numerals (they're OfNat.ofNat 3 vs Nat.cast 3 — `Nat.cast_ofNat` is the bridge simp lemma: add it: simp only [LSeries.norm_term_eq, h3re, h2re, Nat.cast_ofNat, Real.rpow_natCast]. Hmm — but (3:ℝ) as OfNat.ofNat 3 → Nat.cast_ofNat : Nat.cast 3 = 3?? Nat.cast_ofNat is `(↑n : ℝ) = n`?? Let me not overthink — simplest robust: skip the conversion entirely and prove `e` in the RPOW world directly:\n\n```\n have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ) =\n (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := by\n rw [show (3 : ℝ) = 2 + 1 by norm_num, Real.rpow_add (by positivity : (0:ℝ) < (n:ℝ)),\n Real.rpow_one]\n field_simp [show (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 by positivity]\n ring\n```\nx^3 = x^(2+1) = x^2·x^1 = x²·x: Λ/(x²·x) = (1/x)·(Λ/x²) ✓. Then the calc:\n```\n calc ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ)\n = (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := e\n _ ≤ (1 / 2) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) :=\n mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h12 hpos\n```\nwith hpos's power also ^ (2:ℝ): div_nonneg Λnn (by positivity : 0 ≤ ↑n^(2:ℝ))... positivity handles rpow of positive base ✓ probably (positivity knows Real.rpow_pos_of_pos? it has extensions for rpow ✓).\n\nh12's goal after the rw fix: `1 / ↑n ≤ 1 / 2` — the error at 223 was div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left's rw failing: pattern `1 / 2 ≤ 1 / ↑n` not found in `1 / ↑n ≤ 1 / 2` — the div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left gives `a/c ≤ a/b ↔ b ≤ c` (from the earlier analysis: div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a/b ≤ a/c ↔ c ≤ b) — the goal `1/↑n ≤ 1/2`: a/b ≤ a/c with a=1, b=↑n, c=2: rw [div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left ...] turns it into `c ≤ b` = `2 ≤ ↑n` — the error says pattern `1 / 2 ≤ 1 / ↑n` not found in `1 / ↑n ≤ 1 / 2` — so this Mathlib's div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left is stated the OTHER way: `a/c ≤ a/b ↔ b ≤ c`!! (the banked session-033 gotcha: \"one_div_le_one_div_of_le takes the small side's positivity first\" and \"div_lt_iff₀ is a/c<b here (lt_div_iff₀ for a<b/c)\" — direction variations.) The error's pattern shows `1 / 2 ≤ 1 / ↑n` — meaning rw tried to unify the lemma's LHS `?a/?c ≤ ?a/?b`... the lemma must be: div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ c. So rw gives `2 ≤ ↑n`?? but the pattern search shows it wanted `1/2 ≤ 1/↑n` — YES: the lemma's LHS is `a / c ≤ a / b` with c=2, b=↑n: `1/2 ≤ 1/↑n` — that's what it searched for and didn't find because the goal is `1/↑n ≤ 1/2` (the other direction). So this Mathlib's div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left : a/c ≤ a/b ↔ b ≤ c — for the goal 1/↑n ≤ 1/2 I need the OTHER form: `one_div_le_one_div_of_le (hb : 0 < b) (h : b ≤ c) : 1 / c ≤ 1 / b`?? — banked session-033: \"one_div_le_one_div_of_le takes the small side's positivity first\" — `one_div_le_one_div_of_le : 0 < a → a ≤ b → 1 / b ≤ 1 / a` ✓. So: `exact one_div_le_one_div_of_le (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 2) (by exact_mod_cast hn2 : (2:ℝ) ≤ (n:ℝ))` — gives 1/↑n ≤ 1/2 ✓✓. Cleanest:\n```\n have h12 : (1 : ℝ) / (n : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 :=\n one_div_le_one_div_of_le (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 2)\n (by exact_mod_cast hn2 : (2 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ))\n```\n\nApply all three fixes: e with rpow (via rpow_add/rpow_one), h12 via one_div_le_one_div_of_le, hpos with rpow-positivity.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The powers are `rpow` (real exponents from `s.re`), not `pow` — fixing `e` to the rpow world, plus the `one_div` comparison direction."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_224","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiDogLeg.lean","old_string":" have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ 3 =\n (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ 2) := by\n field_simp [show (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 by positivity]\n have h12 : (1 : ℝ) / (n : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 := by\n rw [div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1)\n (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 2) (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) < (n : ℝ))]\n exact_mod_cast hn2\n have hpos : (0 : ℝ) ≤ ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ 2 :=\n div_nonneg ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_nonneg\n (pow_nonneg (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ)) 2)\n calc ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ 3\n = (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ 2) := e\n _ ≤ (1 / 2) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ 2) :=\n mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h12 hpos","new_string":" have e : ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ) =\n (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := by\n rw [show (3 : ℝ) = 2 + 1 by norm_num,\n Real.rpow_add (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) < (n : ℝ)), Real.rpow_one]\n field_simp [show (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 by positivity]\n ring\n have h12 : (1 : ℝ) / (n : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 :=\n one_div_le_one_div_of_le (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 2)\n (by exact_mod_cast hn2 : (2 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ))\n have hpos : (0 : ℝ) ≤ ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ) :=\n div_nonneg ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_nonneg\n (Real.rpow_nonneg (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ)) _)\n calc ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (3 : ℝ)\n = (1 / (n : ℝ)) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) := e\n _ ≤ (1 / 2) * (ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt n / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℝ)) :=\n mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h12 hpos"},"extra_content":null}]