← Session 35 — ii′-6-R: Lagarias 6.1 right-tail re-proof (E-032/D-073)
thinking (3776 chars)
Two errors:
1. **Line 472 (envelope calc last step)**: after `rw [halg]`, the goal is `dirichletC2 * (4·eA + 4·eB) ≤ (4·eA + 4·eB) * dirichletC2` — rw [halg] rewrote the INSIDE product but the C2 placement flipped: my calc's last step is `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` = the statement's RHS — and rw [halg] rewrote the parenthesized product `(exp+1)·2^(−(σ−2))` → `(4eA+4eB)` — the goal became `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB) ≤ (4eA + 4eB) * dirichletC2`?? — wait — the calc step is `dirichletC2 * ((exp+1)·2^(−(σ−2))) = dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` — rw [halg] rewrites the inner product ✓ → `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB) = dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)`?? — the error shows `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB) ≤ (4eA + 4eB) * dirichletC2` — the calc is a ≤ chain!! The last calc step is `X ≤ dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` — and rw [halg] on X... — hmm, the whole envelope calc is a `calc ‖Jlag‖ ≤ hprod-step = C2·((exp+1)·2^...) = C2·(4eA+4eB)` — the final step `C2·((exp+1)·2^...) = C2·(4eA+4eB) := by rw [halg]` — rw [halg] rewrites `(exp+1)·2^(−(σ−2))` → `(4eA+4eB)` ✓ both sides become `C2·(4eA+4eB)` ✓ rfl ✓. But the error shows `C2·(4eA+4eB) ≤ (4eA+4eB)·C2` — so the calc's FINAL expected RHS (the theorem statement) is `(4·eA + 4·eB) * dirichletC2` — C2-LAST! I edited the envelope's calc to be C2-first but the THEOREM STATEMENT still ends with `·dirichletC2` at the end!! The theorem's statement: `‖Jlag‖ ≤ (4·eA + 4·eB) * dirichletC2` — and my calc ends with `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` — MISMATCH. I need to change the theorem STATEMENT to C2-first: `‖Jlag‖ ≤ dirichletC2 * (4·eA + 4·eB)`. And its consumers: hpt in the capstone (the bound form) — h1's integral — h2 — all should then use C2-first. The capstone's h2 statement I wrote has LHS `∫ (4eA+4eB)·C2` — should become `∫ dirichletC2·(4eA+4eB)`. Let me fix the theorem statement + hpt/h1/h2 accordingly.
2. **Line 564 (integral_exp_neg_le linarith)**: STILL failing — a✝ not shown this time but h2 : `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c ≤ 0` is in context and the goal (after sub_le_iff_le_add) is `-Real.exp (-c·XR)/c ≤ Real.exp (-3·c)/c + -Real.exp (-3·c)/c` — hmm wait — sub_le_iff_le_add : a − b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b. The goal after FTC+e is `-X/c - -E/c ≤ E/c` — sub_le_iff_le_add turns it into `-X/c ≤ E/c + (-E/c)` — E/c + (−E/c) = 0 — linarith with h2 : −X/c ≤ 0: `-X/c ≤ E/c + (−E/c)` ⟺ `-X/c ≤ 0` ✓ — linarith should close: E/c + (−E/c) cancels as ring atoms ✓ and −X/c ≤ 0 = h2 ✓. WHY does it still fail?!
The a✝ isn't shown this time (truncated output). Let me think about what could go wrong... `sub_le_iff_le_add` — does it exist with that exact name? If the rw [sub_le_iff_le_add] FAILED to fire (pattern not found), the goal would remain `-X/c - -E/c ≤ E/c` and linarith [h2]... should ALSO close (it's the same inequality: −X/c + E/c ≤ E/c ⟺ −X/c ≤ 0 ✓). Both forms need the atom-relation `−X/c = −(X/c)`... — the h2's form: `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c ≤ 0` — hmm — is `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c` the SAME atom as the goal's `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c`? After sub_le_iff_le_add, the goal is `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c ≤ Real.exp (-3 * c) / c + -Real.exp (-3 * c) / c` — linarith: atoms X/c := `Real.exp (-c * XR) / c` (appears as `-X/c` in the goal) and E/c := `Real.exp (-3 * c) / c` (appears twice with opposite signs). From h2: `-(X/c) ≤ 0` i.e. X/c ≥ 0: goal: −(X/c) ≤ E/c + (−E/c) = 0 ✓ — linarith MUST close this. Unless sub_le_iff_le_add turned it into something weird like `-X/c ≤ E/c - E/c` — same thing ✓.
WAIT — maybe the problem is that `sub_le_iff_le_add` doesn't exist / fired wrong — and the goal is in the ORIGINAL form `-X/c - -E/c ≤ E/c` — linarith: −X/c + E/c ≤ E/c ⟺ −X/c ≤ 0 ✓ h2 ✓ closes either way. I'm baffled. Let me look at the FULL error (it got truncated — the a✝ line is missing). Get the complete error output.
The theorem statement is C2-last while the calc is C2-first — aligning them. Also getting the full linarith error context.
tool: Bash
input
{
"command": "cd D:/Python/Quantum/research/lean/NguyenRH1 && export PATH=\"$HOME/.elan/bin:$PATH\" && lake env lean NguyenRH1/LiDogLeg.lean 2>&1 | sed -n '1,60p'",
"description": "Get the full error output for LiDogLeg",
"timeout": 300000
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Two errors:\n\n1. **Line 472 (envelope calc last step)**: after `rw [halg]`, the goal is `dirichletC2 * (4·eA + 4·eB) ≤ (4·eA + 4·eB) * dirichletC2` — rw [halg] rewrote the INSIDE product but the C2 placement flipped: my calc's last step is `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` = the statement's RHS — and rw [halg] rewrote the parenthesized product `(exp+1)·2^(−(σ−2))` → `(4eA+4eB)` — the goal became `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB) ≤ (4eA + 4eB) * dirichletC2`?? — wait — the calc step is `dirichletC2 * ((exp+1)·2^(−(σ−2))) = dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` — rw [halg] rewrites the inner product ✓ → `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB) = dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)`?? — the error shows `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB) ≤ (4eA + 4eB) * dirichletC2` — the calc is a ≤ chain!! The last calc step is `X ≤ dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` — and rw [halg] on X... — hmm, the whole envelope calc is a `calc ‖Jlag‖ ≤ hprod-step = C2·((exp+1)·2^...) = C2·(4eA+4eB)` — the final step `C2·((exp+1)·2^...) = C2·(4eA+4eB) := by rw [halg]` — rw [halg] rewrites `(exp+1)·2^(−(σ−2))` → `(4eA+4eB)` ✓ both sides become `C2·(4eA+4eB)` ✓ rfl ✓. But the error shows `C2·(4eA+4eB) ≤ (4eA+4eB)·C2` — so the calc's FINAL expected RHS (the theorem statement) is `(4·eA + 4·eB) * dirichletC2` — C2-LAST! I edited the envelope's calc to be C2-first but the THEOREM STATEMENT still ends with `·dirichletC2` at the end!! The theorem's statement: `‖Jlag‖ ≤ (4·eA + 4·eB) * dirichletC2` — and my calc ends with `dirichletC2 * (4eA + 4eB)` — MISMATCH. I need to change the theorem STATEMENT to C2-first: `‖Jlag‖ ≤ dirichletC2 * (4·eA + 4·eB)`. And its consumers: hpt in the capstone (the bound form) — h1's integral — h2 — all should then use C2-first. The capstone's h2 statement I wrote has LHS `∫ (4eA+4eB)·C2` — should become `∫ dirichletC2·(4eA+4eB)`. Let me fix the theorem statement + hpt/h1/h2 accordingly.\n\n2. **Line 564 (integral_exp_neg_le linarith)**: STILL failing — a✝ not shown this time but h2 : `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c ≤ 0` is in context and the goal (after sub_le_iff_le_add) is `-Real.exp (-c·XR)/c ≤ Real.exp (-3·c)/c + -Real.exp (-3·c)/c` — hmm wait — sub_le_iff_le_add : a − b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b. The goal after FTC+e is `-X/c - -E/c ≤ E/c` — sub_le_iff_le_add turns it into `-X/c ≤ E/c + (-E/c)` — E/c + (−E/c) = 0 — linarith with h2 : −X/c ≤ 0: `-X/c ≤ E/c + (−E/c)` ⟺ `-X/c ≤ 0` ✓ — linarith should close: E/c + (−E/c) cancels as ring atoms ✓ and −X/c ≤ 0 = h2 ✓. WHY does it still fail?!\n\nThe a✝ isn't shown this time (truncated output). Let me think about what could go wrong... `sub_le_iff_le_add` — does it exist with that exact name? If the rw [sub_le_iff_le_add] FAILED to fire (pattern not found), the goal would remain `-X/c - -E/c ≤ E/c` and linarith [h2]... should ALSO close (it's the same inequality: −X/c + E/c ≤ E/c ⟺ −X/c ≤ 0 ✓). Both forms need the atom-relation `−X/c = −(X/c)`... — the h2's form: `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c ≤ 0` — hmm — is `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c` the SAME atom as the goal's `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c`? After sub_le_iff_le_add, the goal is `-Real.exp (-c * XR) / c ≤ Real.exp (-3 * c) / c + -Real.exp (-3 * c) / c` — linarith: atoms X/c := `Real.exp (-c * XR) / c` (appears as `-X/c` in the goal) and E/c := `Real.exp (-3 * c) / c` (appears twice with opposite signs). From h2: `-(X/c) ≤ 0` i.e. X/c ≥ 0: goal: −(X/c) ≤ E/c + (−E/c) = 0 ✓ — linarith MUST close this. Unless sub_le_iff_le_add turned it into something weird like `-X/c ≤ E/c - E/c` — same thing ✓.\n\nWAIT — maybe the problem is that `sub_le_iff_le_add` doesn't exist / fired wrong — and the goal is in the ORIGINAL form `-X/c - -E/c ≤ E/c` — linarith: −X/c + E/c ≤ E/c ⟺ −X/c ≤ 0 ✓ h2 ✓ closes either way. I'm baffled. Let me look at the FULL error (it got truncated — the a✝ line is missing). Get the complete error output.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The theorem statement is C2-last while the calc is C2-first — aligning them. Also getting the full linarith error context."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Bash_280","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd D:/Python/Quantum/research/lean/NguyenRH1 && export PATH=\"$HOME/.elan/bin:$PATH\" && lake env lean NguyenRH1/LiDogLeg.lean 2>&1 | sed -n '1,60p'","description":"Get the full error output for LiDogLeg","timeout":300000},"extra_content":null}]