Current task: —

← Session 35 — ii′-6-R: Lagarias 6.1 right-tail re-proof (E-032/D-073)

#2243 assistant 2026-08-26 13:49:45.888 UTC · 283→1661 tok open ⤢
thinking (3940 chars)
Progress: the first error is gone. Now the conj identity's ext goals: - re: `-5/2 = (-(starRingEnd ℂ) 5/(starRingEnd ℂ) 2).re` — the RHS is (conj(↑(-5/2))).re... simp normalized ↑(-5/2) into `-(starRingEnd 5)/(starRingEnd 2)`?? That's bizarre — it means simp rewrote `↑(-5/2)` (ofReal of the real -5/2) as `-(↑5)/(↑2)` and then something rewrote `↑(5:ℝ)` as `(starRingEnd ℂ) 5`?! That's `Complex.ofReal_ofNat`-type simp lemma misfiring: `↑(5:ℝ) = 5` (ofReal_natCast?) and then... the starRingEnd appears from conj_ofReal being applied BACKWARDS: simp used `Complex.conj_ofReal : starRingEnd ↑r = ↑r` LEFT-TO-RIGHT would REMOVE the starRingEnd. But the goal displays starRingEnd on the numeral — so simp applied `(symm)`: `↑r = starRingEnd ↑r`?? No — simp never applies symm unless the lemma is oriented that way... Hmm wait, look at the goal: `-5/2 = (-(starRingEnd ℂ) 5/(starRingEnd ℂ) 2).re`. The `.re` suggests this is the re-component goal after ext: `(LHS).re = (RHS).re` — LHS = (↑(-5/2) + ↑(-t)*I).re = -5/2 ✓ simp computed; RHS = (starRingEnd (↑(-5/2)+↑t*I)).re — simp rewrote (starRingEnd z).re = (conj z).re = z.re — via `Complex.conj_re`? which gives (↑(-5/2)+↑t*I).re = -5/2... but the display shows the starRingEnd INSIDE — so simp instead rewrote ↑(-5/2) : ℂ = starRingEnd(↑(-5/2))?? There's a simp lemma `Complex.conj_ofReal` : starRingEnd ℂ ↑r = ↑r — left-to-right removes starRingEnd. The display has `-(starRingEnd ℂ) 5/(starRingEnd ℂ) 2` — this looks like `↑(-5/2)` got rewritten to `-(↑5)/(↑2)` = `-(starRingEnd 5)/(starRingEnd 2)`?? So simp rewrote `(5:ℂ)` [the complex numeral] BACKWARD into `starRingEnd 5`?? OH WAIT. I see — `Complex.ext` in the current Mathlib might be `ext : a = b → a.re = b.re ∧ a.im = b.im` applied in the WRONG direction or my `apply Complex.ext` created goals a.re = b.re where the expressions got simp-normalized weirdly. The numeral `-5/2` on the LHS is `(−5/2 : ℂ)` (a complex ratCast) vs RHS contains `↑(-5/2 : ℝ)` (ofReal). simp normalizes complex ratCasts: `(−5/2 : ℂ) = -(5:ℂ)/2` hmm and ofReal(-5/2) = -(↑5)/(↑2) via ofReal_div/ofReal_neg/ofNat... and then `starRingEnd` on numerals: `map_ofNat`: starRingEnd 5 = 5 — should FIRE and REMOVE starRingEnd. Unless... the starRingEnd is on `5` as a NAT?? `(starRingEnd ℂ) 5` where 5 : ℂ — map_ofNat should close. Hmm — maybe the issue: `simp` defaulted differently. The DL-5 file used plain `simp` for hid2 with a variable σ and it worked. The difference here: the numeral -5/2. Let me just avoid the identity entirely by using a cleaner path: instead of rewriting the point via hconj, use `show` with the points DEFEQ-normalized... they're not defeq (conj isn't defeq to ofReal for numerals? conj(↑r) reduces? starRingEnd on ofReal — probably not defeq). Robust alternative: prove the identity with explicit map lemmas: ```lean have hconj : ((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (-t : ℝ) * Complex.I = (starRingEnd ℂ) (((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (t : ℝ) * Complex.I) := by rw [map_add, Complex.conj_ofReal, map_mul, Complex.conj_ofReal, Complex.conj_I] rw [show ((-t : ℝ) : ℂ) = -((t : ℝ) : ℂ) by push_cast; ring] ring ``` map_add : starRingEnd (a+b) = starRingEnd a + starRingEnd b ✓; conj_ofReal : starRingEnd ↑r = ↑r ✓; map_mul; conj_I : starRingEnd I = -I ✓. After: RHS = ↑(-5/2) + ↑t·(-I) = ↑(-5/2) − ↑t·I. LHS = ↑(-5/2) + ↑(-t)·I. Then ↑(-t) = −↑t (ofReal_neg — push_cast) ⟹ LHS = ↑(-5/2) − ↑t·I = RHS via ring ✓. Wait — the issue may be that `map_mul` gives starRingEnd (↑t * I) = starRingEnd ↑t * starRingEnd I, then conj_ofReal: ↑t, conj_I: −I: RHS total = ↑(-5/2) + ↑t * (−I). Then `rw [show (↑(-t):ℂ) = −↑t ...]` on LHS: ↑(-5/2) + (−↑t)*I. ring closes ✓. Actually simpler — DL-5's hid2 worked with `simp` for `(↑σ + ↑(-T) * I) = starRingEnd (↑σ + ↑T*I)`. The failing part is purely the numeral. Use the same pattern but with the real number as a VARIABLE-shaped expression? No — just use the rw-chain. Let me apply it.
The numeral cast breaks simp's normalization. Using an explicit map-lemma chain instead.
tool: Edit
input
{
  "file_path": "D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiSideBounds.lean",
  "old_string": "  have hconj : ((-5 / 2 : \u211d) : \u2102) + (-t : \u211d) * Complex.I =\n      (starRingEnd \u2102) (((-5 / 2 : \u211d) : \u2102) + (t : \u211d) * Complex.I) := by\n    apply Complex.ext <;> simp",
  "new_string": "  have hconj : ((-5 / 2 : \u211d) : \u2102) + (-t : \u211d) * Complex.I =\n      (starRingEnd \u2102) (((-5 / 2 : \u211d) : \u2102) + (t : \u211d) * Complex.I) := by\n    rw [map_add, Complex.conj_ofReal, map_mul, Complex.conj_ofReal, Complex.conj_I]\n    rw [show ((-t : \u211d) : \u2102) = -((t : \u211d) : \u2102) by push_cast; ring]\n    ring"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Progress: the first error is gone. Now the conj identity's ext goals: \n- re: `-5/2 = (-(starRingEnd ℂ) 5/(starRingEnd ℂ) 2).re` — the RHS is (conj(↑(-5/2))).re... simp normalized ↑(-5/2) into `-(starRingEnd 5)/(starRingEnd 2)`?? That's bizarre — it means simp rewrote `↑(-5/2)` (ofReal of the real -5/2) as `-(↑5)/(↑2)` and then something rewrote `↑(5:ℝ)` as `(starRingEnd ℂ) 5`?! That's `Complex.ofReal_ofNat`-type simp lemma misfiring: `↑(5:ℝ) = 5` (ofReal_natCast?) and then... the starRingEnd appears from conj_ofReal being applied BACKWARDS: simp used `Complex.conj_ofReal : starRingEnd ↑r = ↑r` LEFT-TO-RIGHT would REMOVE the starRingEnd. But the goal displays starRingEnd on the numeral — so simp applied `(symm)`: `↑r = starRingEnd ↑r`?? No — simp never applies symm unless the lemma is oriented that way... \n\nHmm wait, look at the goal: `-5/2 = (-(starRingEnd ℂ) 5/(starRingEnd ℂ) 2).re`. The `.re` suggests this is the re-component goal after ext: `(LHS).re = (RHS).re` — LHS = (↑(-5/2) + ↑(-t)*I).re = -5/2 ✓ simp computed; RHS = (starRingEnd (↑(-5/2)+↑t*I)).re — simp rewrote (starRingEnd z).re = (conj z).re = z.re — via `Complex.conj_re`? which gives (↑(-5/2)+↑t*I).re = -5/2... but the display shows the starRingEnd INSIDE — so simp instead rewrote ↑(-5/2) : ℂ = starRingEnd(↑(-5/2))?? There's a simp lemma `Complex.conj_ofReal` : starRingEnd ℂ ↑r = ↑r — left-to-right removes starRingEnd. The display has `-(starRingEnd ℂ) 5/(starRingEnd ℂ) 2` — this looks like `↑(-5/2)` got rewritten to `-(↑5)/(↑2)` = `-(starRingEnd 5)/(starRingEnd 2)`?? So simp rewrote `(5:ℂ)` [the complex numeral] BACKWARD into `starRingEnd 5`?? \n\nOH WAIT. I see — `Complex.ext` in the current Mathlib might be `ext : a = b → a.re = b.re ∧ a.im = b.im` applied in the WRONG direction or my `apply Complex.ext` created goals a.re = b.re where the expressions got simp-normalized weirdly. The numeral `-5/2` on the LHS is `(−5/2 : ℂ)` (a complex ratCast) vs RHS contains `↑(-5/2 : ℝ)` (ofReal). simp normalizes complex ratCasts: `(−5/2 : ℂ) = -(5:ℂ)/2` hmm and ofReal(-5/2) = -(↑5)/(↑2) via ofReal_div/ofReal_neg/ofNat... and then `starRingEnd` on numerals: `map_ofNat`: starRingEnd 5 = 5 — should FIRE and REMOVE starRingEnd. Unless... the starRingEnd is on `5` as a NAT?? `(starRingEnd ℂ) 5` where 5 : ℂ — map_ofNat should close. \n\nHmm — maybe the issue: `simp` defaulted differently. The DL-5 file used plain `simp` for hid2 with a variable σ and it worked. The difference here: the numeral -5/2. Let me just avoid the identity entirely by using a cleaner path: instead of rewriting the point via hconj, use `show` with the points DEFEQ-normalized... they're not defeq (conj isn't defeq to ofReal for numerals? conj(↑r) reduces? starRingEnd on ofReal — probably not defeq).\n\nRobust alternative: prove the identity with explicit map lemmas:\n\n```lean\n  have hconj : ((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (-t : ℝ) * Complex.I =\n      (starRingEnd ℂ) (((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (t : ℝ) * Complex.I) := by\n    rw [map_add, Complex.conj_ofReal, map_mul, Complex.conj_ofReal, Complex.conj_I]\n    rw [show ((-t : ℝ) : ℂ) = -((t : ℝ) : ℂ) by push_cast; ring]\n    ring\n```\n\nmap_add : starRingEnd (a+b) = starRingEnd a + starRingEnd b ✓; conj_ofReal : starRingEnd ↑r = ↑r ✓; map_mul; conj_I : starRingEnd I = -I ✓. After: RHS = ↑(-5/2) + ↑t·(-I) = ↑(-5/2) − ↑t·I. LHS = ↑(-5/2) + ↑(-t)·I. Then ↑(-t) = −↑t (ofReal_neg — push_cast) ⟹ LHS = ↑(-5/2) − ↑t·I = RHS via ring ✓.\n\nWait — the issue may be that `map_mul` gives starRingEnd (↑t * I) = starRingEnd ↑t * starRingEnd I, then conj_ofReal: ↑t, conj_I: −I: RHS total = ↑(-5/2) + ↑t * (−I). Then `rw [show (↑(-t):ℂ) = −↑t ...]` on LHS: ↑(-5/2) + (−↑t)*I. ring closes ✓.\n\nActually simpler — DL-5's hid2 worked with `simp` for `(↑σ + ↑(-T) * I) = starRingEnd (↑σ + ↑T*I)`. The failing part is purely the numeral. Use the same pattern but with the real number as a VARIABLE-shaped expression? No — just use the rw-chain. Let me apply it.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"The numeral cast breaks simp's normalization. Using an explicit map-lemma chain instead."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Edit_52","name":"Edit","input":{"file_path":"D:\\Python\\Quantum\\research\\lean\\NguyenRH1\\NguyenRH1\\LiSideBounds.lean","old_string":"  have hconj : ((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (-t : ℝ) * Complex.I =\n      (starRingEnd ℂ) (((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (t : ℝ) * Complex.I) := by\n    apply Complex.ext <;> simp","new_string":"  have hconj : ((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (-t : ℝ) * Complex.I =\n      (starRingEnd ℂ) (((-5 / 2 : ℝ) : ℂ) + (t : ℝ) * Complex.I) := by\n    rw [map_add, Complex.conj_ofReal, map_mul, Complex.conj_ofReal, Complex.conj_I]\n    rw [show ((-t : ℝ) : ℂ) = -((t : ℝ) : ℂ) by push_cast; ring]\n    ring"},"extra_content":null}]