← Session 37 — Paper A revisions: certificate retraction + margin fix
thinking (926 chars)
Committed as 5be5499. Everything is now in place:
- paperA.tex, references.bib, paperA.pdf all committed at 13 pp, clean.
- Only untracked build artifacts (bbl/blg/fls/fdb) and paperB.pdf + submit/ remain, as before.
Session 043 work on Paper A is complete. The user's verdict was: after these three edits, stop iterative rewriting and move to independent expert audit. The remaining flagged items are archive-side (session-end protocol: journal-043, STATE.md update, and the two archive sweeps I flagged: Rosser misattribution in D-036/D-037/NGUYEN.md/Lean docstrings, 2+5 → 4+3 reclassification).
Per §8.4 the session END protocol happens before shutdown. The user hasn't said to end the session. I'll report the final state concisely and remind them of the pending archive sweep items + ask whether to run the end protocol now or continue. Actually — keep it minimal: report done, list what's outstanding. Don't over-ask.
Done — `5be5499`. Paper A is fully committed and consistent:
- **Source**: `d82711a` (revision 3: Rosser Thm-19 form, $\kappa_n$/$\Lambda_n$ separation, $P(T)$/$F(T)$ separation, MZeroProp documentation)
- **PDF**: regenerated after the viewer lock released — **13 pp, zero overfull hboxes, zero undefined refs/citations**, byte-identical to the verified build
Working tree is back to its prior state (only your correspondence package, Scratch.lean, and untracked build artifacts remain uncommitted, as designed).
Outstanding, per your earlier calls:
1. **Session-043 end protocol** (journal-043, STATE.md, research.db) — not yet run; I'll do it when you signal session end.
2. **Archive sweep**: "Trudgian 2014" → Rosser 1941 misattribution in D-036/D-037/NGUYEN.md/Lean docstrings/E-script comments, plus the "2+5 → 4+3" perimeter reclassification note. All comment/documentation-level; no proofs affected.
3. **Next gate per your verdict**: independent expert audit of the seven perimeter instantiations + the dog-leg argument.
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Committed as 5be5499. Everything is now in place:\n- paperA.tex, references.bib, paperA.pdf all committed at 13 pp, clean.\n- Only untracked build artifacts (bbl/blg/fls/fdb) and paperB.pdf + submit/ remain, as before.\n\nSession 043 work on Paper A is complete. The user's verdict was: after these three edits, stop iterative rewriting and move to independent expert audit. The remaining flagged items are archive-side (session-end protocol: journal-043, STATE.md update, and the two archive sweeps I flagged: Rosser misattribution in D-036/D-037/NGUYEN.md/Lean docstrings, 2+5 → 4+3 reclassification).\n\nPer §8.4 the session END protocol happens before shutdown. The user hasn't said to end the session. I'll report the final state concisely and remind them of the pending archive sweep items + ask whether to run the end protocol now or continue. Actually — keep it minimal: report done, list what's outstanding. Don't over-ask.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"Done — `5be5499`. Paper A is fully committed and consistent:\n\n- **Source**: `d82711a` (revision 3: Rosser Thm-19 form, $\\kappa_n$/$\\Lambda_n$ separation, $P(T)$/$F(T)$ separation, MZeroProp documentation)\n- **PDF**: regenerated after the viewer lock released — **13 pp, zero overfull hboxes, zero undefined refs/citations**, byte-identical to the verified build\n\nWorking tree is back to its prior state (only your correspondence package, Scratch.lean, and untracked build artifacts remain uncommitted, as designed).\n\nOutstanding, per your earlier calls:\n1. **Session-043 end protocol** (journal-043, STATE.md, research.db) — not yet run; I'll do it when you signal session end.\n2. **Archive sweep**: \"Trudgian 2014\" → Rosser 1941 misattribution in D-036/D-037/NGUYEN.md/Lean docstrings/E-script comments, plus the \"2+5 → 4+3\" perimeter reclassification note. All comment/documentation-level; no proofs affected.\n3. **Next gate per your verdict**: independent expert audit of the seven perimeter instantiations + the dog-leg argument."}]