[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"While it runs, useful parallel work: update STATE.md? Not yet — mid-task. I could start preparing fork 3 (de Bruijn–Newman) or just wait. The user asked to follow my recommendation — step 4 is re-run E-011, step 5 session-end. While waiting, I could pre-draft the session-004 journal. But better to wait for the result to write accurate content.\n\nI'll just report status to user and wait for the notification.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"E-011 re-run is going in the background (~15–25 min for the flint Stieltjes sweep at n_max=2000). Status so far:\n\n**Done:**\n1. ✅ E-010 extended re-run validated (all 4 checks pass), re-registered in research.db\n2. ✅ Committed `b04e50a` — paper archive reorg + E-010 extension (safe against another kill)\n3. ✅ Root-caused the E-011 \"mystery\": the failing data was produced by an **older script version** (script was edited 34 min after the data was written, then the session was killed before re-running). The old run's λ₁ error was a 53-bit signature; the new script's inputs all verify clean to ~900 digits. Also found and fixed a genuinely wrong hardcoded constant: `LAMBDA1_KNOWN` diverged from the true value at digit 22 — now flint-verified to 100 digits.\n\n**In progress:** E-011 re-run with the corrected script (n_max=2000, dps=1000). First attempt hit the 10-min timeout — the flint `acb.stieltjes` sweep scales ~k³ (28s for k=2000 alone) — so it's now running in the background; I'll be notified when it finishes, then check V1/V2/V3/V5 and proceed to the session-end protocol."}]