Current task: —

← Session 36 — ii′-6-DL dog-leg + side bounds; Paper A review

#2340 assistant 2026-08-26 22:34:31.012 UTC · 440→681 tok open ⤢
thinking (2093 chars)
Clean compile: 11 pages, zero errors/undefined refs, both new bib entries in the .bbl. Now the remaining archive fixes: 1. cover-letter.md + referee-list.md Misguich–Voros mentions → Johansson. 2. NGUYEN.md: "eight" → seven in the ii′-7 closure note + Ledger #6; the perimeter description (5×10⁵ → 10⁵ Johansson); the 3.2 entry's Misguich–Voros mention (historical — leave? — the 3.2 entry says "R-004's finite verification uses our table to 3000 + external Misguich–Voros to 5×10⁵" — that's the historical claim, now corrected — add a note or update). Also the Phase 5B perimeter line mentions the perimeter incl. "LiVerifiedUpTo" — check. 3. STATE.md: the "eight" count + certificate description + the next-action mention of the revision. 4. R-004: the tag line ("Misguich–Voros"), the finite-verification description (line ~64), the Lean closure note (eight → seven, 5×10⁵ → 10⁵ Johansson). 5. D-037 erratum block: add the certificate-correction note (fifth correction: the Misguich–Voros citation replaced by Johansson + LiVerifiedUpTo (5×10⁵) → (10⁵)). 6. journal-041: addendum noting the review revision (or a new journal entry session-042? — this is a distinct review-revision stage — better as a new short journal entry session-042.md + db registration + STATE.md note). Hmm — session accounting: this revision round is arguably "session 042" (a new stage: the user's review + the revision). Let me treat it as session 042 with its own journal entry, db registration, and STATE.md update. That's cleaner per the protocol (each stage gets a journal entry). Let me do: A. cover-letter.md + referee-list.md fixes. B. R-004 fixes (tag line, finite-verification description, Lean-closure note count/certificate). C. D-037 erratum block addendum (the fifth correction: certificate). D. NGUYEN.md fixes (ii′-7 note count, Ledger #6 count + certificate, perimeter description). E. journal/session-042.md (the review-revision entry) + db registration. F. STATE.md update (the revision headline + new next action). G. Final commit(s). Let me read the cover-letter and referee-list mentions.
Clean compile (11 pp). Now the submission docs and archive text.
tool: Bash
input
{
  "command": "cd \"D:/Python/Quantum\" && grep -n -B2 -A2 \"Misguich\" research/paper/cover-letter.md research/paper/referee-list.md",
  "description": "Show Misguich mentions in submission docs"
}
raw content_json (database row)
[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"Clean compile: 11 pages, zero errors/undefined refs, both new bib entries in the .bbl. \n\nNow the remaining archive fixes:\n1. cover-letter.md + referee-list.md Misguich–Voros mentions → Johansson.\n2. NGUYEN.md: \"eight\" → seven in the ii′-7 closure note + Ledger #6; the perimeter description (5×10⁵ → 10⁵ Johansson); the 3.2 entry's Misguich–Voros mention (historical — leave? — the 3.2 entry says \"R-004's finite verification uses our table to 3000 + external Misguich–Voros to 5×10⁵\" — that's the historical claim, now corrected — add a note or update). Also the Phase 5B perimeter line mentions the perimeter incl. \"LiVerifiedUpTo\" — check.\n3. STATE.md: the \"eight\" count + certificate description + the next-action mention of the revision.\n4. R-004: the tag line (\"Misguich–Voros\"), the finite-verification description (line ~64), the Lean closure note (eight → seven, 5×10⁵ → 10⁵ Johansson).\n5. D-037 erratum block: add the certificate-correction note (fifth correction: the Misguich–Voros citation replaced by Johansson + LiVerifiedUpTo (5×10⁵) → (10⁵)).\n6. journal-041: addendum noting the review revision (or a new journal entry session-042? — this is a distinct review-revision stage — better as a new short journal entry session-042.md + db registration + STATE.md note).\n\nHmm — session accounting: this revision round is arguably \"session 042\" (a new stage: the user's review + the revision). Let me treat it as session 042 with its own journal entry, db registration, and STATE.md update. That's cleaner per the protocol (each stage gets a journal entry).\n\nLet me do:\nA. cover-letter.md + referee-list.md fixes.\nB. R-004 fixes (tag line, finite-verification description, Lean-closure note count/certificate).\nC. D-037 erratum block addendum (the fifth correction: certificate).\nD. NGUYEN.md fixes (ii′-7 note count, Ledger #6 count + certificate, perimeter description).\nE. journal/session-042.md (the review-revision entry) + db registration.\nF. STATE.md update (the revision headline + new next action).\nG. Final commit(s).\n\nLet me read the cover-letter and referee-list mentions.","signature":""},{"type":"text","text":"Clean compile (11 pp). Now the submission docs and archive text."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"Bash_319","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd \"D:/Python/Quantum\" && grep -n -B2 -A2 \"Misguich\" research/paper/cover-letter.md research/paper/referee-list.md","description":"Show Misguich mentions in submission docs"},"extra_content":null}]